skip to main content
10.1145/1943552.1943560acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improving the performance of quality-adaptive video streaming over multiple heterogeneous access networks

Published:23 February 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Devices capable of connecting to multiple, overlapping networks simultaneously are becoming increasingly common. For example, most laptops are equipped with LAN- and WLAN-interfaces, and smart phones can typically connect to both WLANs and 3G mobile networks. At the same time, streaming high-quality video is becoming increasingly popular. However, due to bandwidth limitations or the unreliable and unpredictable nature of some types of networks, streaming video can be subject to frequent periods of rebuffering and characterised by a low picture quality.

In this paper, we present a client-side request scheduler that distributes requests for the video over multiple heterogeneous interfaces simultaneously. Each video is divided into independent segments with constant duration, enabling segments to be requested over separate links, utilizing all the available bandwidth. To increase performance even further, the segments are divided into smaller subsegments, and the sizes are dynamically calculated on the fly, based on the throughput of the different links. This is an improvement over our earlier subsegment approach, which divided segments into fixed size subsegments.

Both subsegment approaches were evaluated with on-demand streaming and quasi-live streaming. The new subsegment approach reduces the number of playback interruptions and improves video quality significantly for all cases where the earlier approach struggled. Otherwise, they show similar performance.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

110223_26192_07_acm.mp4

mp4

146.6 MB

References

  1. Apple Inc. Mac OS X Server -- QuickTime Streaming and Broadcasting Administration, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ars technica. US broadband's average speed: 3.9Mbps. Online: http://bit.ly/6TQROA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. E. Biersack and W. Geyer. Synchronized delivery and playout of distributed stored multimedia streams. Multimedia Syst. J., 7(1):70--90, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. K. Evensen, D. Kaspar, P. Engelstad, A. F. Hansen, C. Griwodz, and P. Halvorsen. A network-layer proxy for bandwidth aggregation and reduction of IP packet reordering. In IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN), pages 585--592, October 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. K. R. Evensen, T. Kupka, D. Kaspar, P. Halvorsen, and C. Griwodz. Quality-adaptive scheduling for live streaming over multiple access networks. In The 20th International Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video (NOSSDAV), pages 21--26, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Funasaka, K. Nagayasu, and K. Ishida. Improvements on block size control method for adaptive parallel downloading. Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, International Conference on, 5:648--653, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. Johansen, H. Johansen, T. Aarflot, J. Hurley, A. Kvalnes, C. Gurrin, S. Zav, B. Olstad, E. Aaberg, T. Endestad, H. Riiser, C. Griwodz, and P. Halvorsen. DAVVI: A prototype for the next generation multimedia entertainment platform. In Proc. ACM MM, pages 989--990, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. D. Kaspar, K. Evensen, P. Engelstad, and A. F. Hansen. Using HTTP pipelining to improve progressive download over multiple heterogeneous interfaces. In Proc. IEEE ICC, pages 1--5, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. A. Miu and E. Shih. Performance analysis of a dynamic parallel downloading scheme from mirror sites throughout the internet. Technical report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Move Networks. Internet television: Challenges and opportunities. Technical report, Move Networks, Inc., November 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. P. Ni, A. Eichhorn, C. Griwodz, and P. Halvorsen. Fine-grained scalable streaming from coarse-grained videos. In Proc. ACM NOSSDAV, pages 103--108, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. P. Rodriguez and E. W. Biersack. Dynamic parallel access to replicated content in the internet. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 10(4):455--465, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. B. Wang, W. Wei, Z. Guo, and D. Towsley. Multipath live streaming via TCP: Scheme, performance and benefits. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl., 5(3):1--23, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. F. Wu, G. Gao, and Y. Liu. Glitch-Free Media Streaming. Patent Application (US2008/0022005), January 24 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. Zambelli. IIS Smooth Streaming technical overview. Technical report, Microsoft Corporation, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    MMSys '11: Proceedings of the second annual ACM conference on Multimedia systems
    February 2011
    294 pages
    ISBN:9781450305181
    DOI:10.1145/1943552

    Copyright © 2011 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 23 February 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate176of530submissions,33%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader