skip to main content
research-article
Free Access

Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control

Published:01 May 2011Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The brain's electrical signals enable people without muscle control to physically interact with the world.

References

  1. Bell, C.J., Shenoy, P., Chalodhorn, R., and Rao, R.P.N. Control of a humanoid robot by a noninvasive brain-computer interface in humans. Journal of Neural Engineering 5, 2 (June 2008), 214--220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Black, A.H., Young, G.A., and Batenchuk, C. Avoidance training of hippocampal theta waves in flaxedilized dogs and its relation to skeletal movement. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 70, 1 (Jan. 1970), 15--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Blankertz, B., Muller, K-R, Krusienski, D.J., Schalk, G., Wolpaw, J.R., Schlogl, A., Pfurtscheller, G., Millan, J., Schroder, M., and Birbaumer, N. The BCI competition III: Validating alternative approaches to actual BCI problems. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 14, 2 (June 2006), 153--159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Coyle, S.M., Ward, T.E., and Markham, C.M. Brain-computer interface using a simplified functional near-infrared spectroscopy system. Journal of Neural Engineering 4, 3 (Sept. 2007), 219--226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Curran, E., Sykacek, P., Stokes, M., Roberts, S.J., Penny, W., Johnsrude, I., and Owen, A. Cognitive tasks for driving a brain-computer interface: A pilot study. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 12, 1 (Mar. 2003), 48--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dewan, E.M. Occipital alpha rhythm eye position and lens accommodation. Nature 214, 5092 (June 3, 1967), 975--977.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Farwell, L.A. and Donchin, E. Talking off the top of your head: Toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 70, 6 (Dec. 1988), 510--523.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fatourechi, M., Bashashati, A., Ward, R.K., and Birch, G.E. EMG and EOG artifacts in brain-computer interface systems: A survey. Clinical Neurophysiology 118, 3 (Mar. 2007), 480--494.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Fetz, E.E. Operant conditioning of cortical unit activity. Science 163, 870 (Feb. 28, 1969), 955--958.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Galan, F., Nuttin, M., Lew, E., Ferrez, P.W., Vanacker, G., Philips, J., and Millan, J.d.R. A brain-actuated wheelchair: Asynchronous and noninvasive brain-computer interfaces for continuous control of robots. Clinical Neurophysiology 119, 9 (Sept. 2008), 2159--2169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. He, B. and Liu, Z. Multimodal functional neuroimaging: Integrating functional MRI and EEG/MEG. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 1 (Nov.2008), 23--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hochberg, L.R., Serruya, M.D., Friehs, G.M., Mukand, J.A., Saleh, M., Caplan, A.H., Branner, A., Penn, D.R.D., and Donoghue, J.P. Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature 442, 7099 (July 13, 2006), 164--171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Krusienski, D.J., Sellers, E.W., McFarland, D.J., Vaughan, T.M., and Wolpaw, J.R. Toward enhanced P300 speller performance. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 167, 1 (Jan. 15, 2008), 15--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Leeb, R., Friedman, D., Muller-Putz, G.R., Scherer, R., Slater, M., and Pfurtscheller, G. Self-paced (asynchronous) BCI control of a wheelchair in virtual environments: A case study with a tetraplegic. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 79642 (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Leuthardt, E.C., Schalk, G., Wolpaw, J.R., Ojemann, J.G., and Moran, D.W. A brain-computer interface using electrocorticographic signals in humans. Journal of Neural Engineering 1, 2 (June 2004), 63--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Lotte, F., Congedo, M., Lecuyer, A., Lamarche, F., and Arnaldi, B. A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces. Journal of Neural Engineering 4, 2 (June 2007), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. McFarland, D.J., Krusienski, D.J., and Wolpaw, J.R. Brain-computer interface signal processing at the Wadsworth Center: Mu and sensorimotor beta rhythms. Progress in Brain Research 159 (2006), 411--419.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. McFarland, D.J., Sarnacki, W.A., Vaughan, T.M., and Wolpaw, J.R. Brain-computer interface (BCI) operation: Signal and noise during early training sessions. Clinical Neurophysiology 116 (2005), 56--62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. McFarland, D.J. and Wolpaw, J.R. Brain-computer interface operation of robotic and prosthetic devices. Computer 41, 10 (Oct. 2008), 48--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Mellinger, J., Schalk, G., Braun, C., Preissl, H., Rosenstiel, W., Birbaumer, N., and Kubler, A. An MEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI). Neuroimage 36, 3 (July 1, 2007), 581--593.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Muller, K.-R., and Blankertz, B. Towards noninvasive brain-computer interfaces. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 23, 1 (Sept. 2006), 125--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Muller, K.-R., Tangermann, M., Dornhege, G., Krauledat, M., Curio, GT., and Blankertz, B. Machine learning for real-time single-trial EEG-analysis: From brain-computer interfacing to mental-state monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 167, 1 (Jan. 15, 2008), 82--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Neidermeyer,. E. Historical aspects. In Electroencephalography: Basic Principals, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields, Fifth Edition, E. Neidermeyer and F. Lopes da Silva, Eds. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2005, 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Pfurtscheller, G., Flotzinger, D., and Kalcher, J. Brain-computer interface: A new communication device for handicapped persons. Journal of Microcomputer Applications 16, 3 (July 1993), 293--299. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Schalk, G., McFarland, D.J., Hinterberger, T., Birbaumer, N., and Wolpaw, J.R. BCI2000: A generalpurpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 51 (2004), 1034--1043.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Scherer, R., Muller, G.R., Neuper, C., Graimann, B., Pfurtschheller, G. An asynchronously controlled EEG-based virtual keyboard: Improvement of the spelling rate. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 51, 6 (June 2004), 979--984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Singer, E. Brain games. Technology Review 111, 4 (July/Aug. 2008), 82--84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Sitaram, R., Caria, A., Veit, R., Gaber, T., Rota, G., Kuebler, A., and Birbaumer, N. fMRI brain-computer interface: A tool for neuroscientific research and treatment. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Sterman, M.B., MacDonald, L.R., and Stone, R.K. Biofeedback training of sensorimotor EEG in man and its effect on epilepsy. Epilepsia 15, 3 (Sept. 1974), 395--416.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Taylor D.A., Tillery S., and Schwartz, A.B. Direct cortical control of 3D neuroprosthetic devices. Science 296, 5574 (June 7, 2002), 1829--1832.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Townsend, G., LaPallo, B.K., Boulay, C.B., Krusienski, D.J., Frye, G.E., Hauser, C.K., Schwartz, N.E., Vaughan, T.M., Wolpaw, J.R., and Sellers, E.W. A novel P300-based brain-computer interface stimulus presentation paradigm: Moving beyond rows and columns. Clinical Neurophysiology 121, 7 (July 2010), 1109--1120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Vaughan, T.M., McFarland, D.J., Schalk, G., Sarnacki, W.A., Krusienski, D.J., Sellers, E.W., and Wolpaw, J.R. The Wadsworth BCI research and development program: At home with BCI. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 14, 2 (June 2006), 229--233.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Vaughan, T.M., Miner, L.A., McFarland, D.J., and Wolpaw, J.R. EEG-based communication: Analysis of concurrent EMG activity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 107, 6 (Dec. 1998), 428--433.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Vidal, J.J. Real-time detection of brain events in EEG. Proceedings of the IEEE 65, 5 (May 1977), 633--641.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Whitham, E.M., Lewis, T., Pope, K.J., Fitzbibbon, S.P., Clark, C.R., Loveless, S., DeLosAngeles, D., Wallace, A.K., Broberg, M., and Willoughby, J.O. Thinking activates EMG in scalp electrical recordings. Clinical Neurophysiology 119, 5 (May 2008), 1166--1175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Wolpaw, J.R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D.J., Pfurtscheller, G., and Vaughan, T.M. Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clinical Neurophysiology 113, 6 (June 2002), 767--791.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Wolpaw, J.R. and McFarland, D.J. Control of a two-dimensional movement signal by a noninvasive brain-computer interface. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 101, 51 (Dec. 21, 2004), 17849--17854.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Wolpaw, J.R., McFarland, D.J., Neat, G.W., and Forneris, C.A. An EEG-based brain-computer interface for cursor control. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 78, 3 (Mar. 1991), 252--259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control

              Recommendations

              Reviews

              George Michael White

              Think about what you have to go through to read this review. You may be reading it in a journal or on a computer screen, but in any case, you have to move your hands and arms to either turn pages or click mouse buttons. Imagine, though, that you have little or no muscle control. Turning a page or clicking a mouse button is a major-perhaps impossible-activity. This is exactly what people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) must do. ALS is a disease that attacks the pathways between the brain and the limbs. Everyday actions that most people perform almost without thinking are impossible for people with ALS. Is there a way to bypass the damaged pathway__?__ If the pathways are not completely damaged (for example, if the eyes or eyebrows are still under the control of the brain), then a person can use the position of the eyes to give information about what the brain wishes to perform. If the disease is so advanced that eye control is no longer possible, then noninvasive electrodes placed on the scalp, or invasive electrodes placed directly on selected parts of the brain, can detect electrical signals. External machines can then use the complex signals received to perform the desired actions. This is all very complicated. The desired actions must correlate with the signals and then be effected. This short article summarizes progress in this field, starting from the early years in the last century to 2010. Those interested in this highly specialized field will enjoy reading it. Online Computing Reviews Service

              Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

              Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              Full Access

              • Published in

                cover image Communications of the ACM
                Communications of the ACM  Volume 54, Issue 5
                May 2011
                134 pages
                ISSN:0001-0782
                EISSN:1557-7317
                DOI:10.1145/1941487
                Issue’s Table of Contents

                Copyright © 2011 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 1 May 2011

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article
                • Popular
                • Refereed

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader

              HTML Format

              View this article in HTML Format .

              View HTML Format