skip to main content
10.1145/1935701.1935776acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Interaction mapping affects spatial memory and the sense of presence when navigating in a virtual environment

Published:22 January 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

By their very nature, virtual reality worlds are spatial. Hence, one of the key requirements for virtual reality applications is the possibility to navigate within the virtual world. Previous studies have shown that the characteristics of the device used for navigation, both in terms of the physical properties, and the interaction logic, has effects on the user's experience. The question we address is how does different navigation modes with the same physical interface affect the user's experience. We selected two modes which differed in the way the user's actions were mapped to movements in the virtual environment. To quantify the difference between the two interaction mappings, spatial memory and the subjective sense of presence were compared. The results of our study showed that interaction mapping affects both, spatial memory and presence. Hence, not only the specific physical device but also the way it is used is important for the user's experience and recollection of it. Additionally, we found a correlation between spatial memory and subjective sense of presence, which indicates that the subjective sense of presence can be estimated from the performance in a spatial memory task.

References

  1. W. Barfield, D. Zeltzer, T. Sheridan, and M. Slater. Presence and performance within virtual environments. In Virtual environments and advanced interface design, pages 473--513. Oxford University Press, Inc., 1995. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. U. Bernardet, S. Bermúdez i Badia, A. Duff, M. Inderbitzin, S. Groux, J. Manzolli, Z. Mathews, A. Mura, A. Väljamäe, and P. Verschure. The eXperience Induction Machine: A New Paradigm for Mixed-Reality Interaction Design and Psychological Experimentation. In The Engineering of Mixed Reality Systems, pages 357--379. Springer, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. U. Bernardet, M. Inderbitzin, S. Wierenga, A. Väljamäe, A. Mura, and P. Verschure. Validating presence by relying on recollection: Human experience and performance in the mixed reality system XIM. In 11th Annual International Workshop on Presence, Padova, Italy, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. U. Bernardet and P. F. Verschure. iqr: A tool for the construction of multi-level simulations of brain and behaviour. Neuroinformatics, 8:113--134, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. K. Booth, B. Fisher, S. Page, C. Ware, and S. Widen. Wayfinding in a virtual environment. In Graphics Interface 2000, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Bowman, D. Koller, and L. Hodges. Evaluation of Movement Control Techniques for Immersive Virtual Environments. 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. R. Darken, W. Cockayne, and D. Carmein. The omni-directional treadmill: a locomotion device for virtual worlds. In Proc. of the UIST 1997, pages 213--221. ACM, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. H. Dinh, N. Walker, L. Hodges, C. Song, and A. Kobayashi. Evaluating the Importance of Multi-sensory Input on Memory and the Sense of Presence in Virtual Environments. In Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality, pages 222--228, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. P. Emmelkamp, M. Krijn, A. Hulsbosch, S. De Vries, M. Schuemie, and C. Van der Mast. Virtual reality treatment versus exposure in vivo: a comparative evaluation in acrophobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40(5):509--516, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. B. Fröhlich and J. Plate. The cubic mouse: a new device for three-dimensional input. In Proc. SIGCHI CHI, pages 526--531. ACM, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Garage Games, Eugene, Oregon, USA. Torque game engine, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. H. Iwata. Walking about virtual environments on an infinite floor. Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality 1999, pages 286--293, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Z. Mathews, S. B. i Badia, and P. F. M. J. Verschure. Action-Planning and Execution from Multimodal Cues: An Integrated Model for Artificial Autonomous Systems. Springer Verlag, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. U. Rosebrock and P. Vamplew. The intent to move; generating spatial memory in Virtual Environments. In Proc. VSMM 1999, pages 407--416, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. T. Schubert, F. Friedmann, and H. Regenbrecht. Embodied presence in virtual environments. Visual representations and interpretations, pages 268--278, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. M. Slater. Measuring presence: A response to the Witmer and Singer presence questionnaire. Presence, 8(5):560--565, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. Slater. How colorful was your day? Why questionnaires cannot assess presence in virtual environments. Presence, 13(4):484--493, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. Slater, C. Guger, G. Edlinger, R. Leeb, G. Pfurtscheller, A. Antley, M. Garau, A. Brogni, and D. Friedman. Analysis of physiological responses to a social situation in an immersive virtual environment. Presence, 15(5):553--569, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. M. Usoh, K. Arthur, M. Whitton, R. Bastos, A. Steed, M. Slater, and F. Brooks Jr. > Walking Walking-in-Place > Flying, in Virtual Environments. In Proc. SIGGRAPH 1999, pages 359--364. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Interaction mapping affects spatial memory and the sense of presence when navigating in a virtual environment

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      TEI '11: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction
      January 2011
      470 pages
      ISBN:9781450304788
      DOI:10.1145/1935701

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 January 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader