skip to main content
10.1145/1924559.1924584acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicvgipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Cell volume estimation from a sparse collection of noisy confocal image slices

Published:12 December 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Measurement and quantification of the volume of cells are very useful for analyzing and understanding cellular behavior, such as cell growth and differentiation. One popular practice is to use Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy(CLSM) to image cell slices and then reconstruct the 3-D volume of the cells from these serial optical slices. However, all of the current methods of volume estimation using CLSM imaging require large number of cell slices (i.e. high volume of image data). But in many practical situations, especially in case of CLSM based live cell imaging, such high depth resolution is not feasible in order to avoid photodynamic damage to cells from prolonged exposure to laser. In this work, we have addressed this problem of finding out the volume of a plant cell using CLSM when the amount of data is as limited as two to three slices per cell. We assume an ellipsoid model for a cell and estimate the minimum volume ellipsoid that encloses all three cell slices in the 3D stack. The level set based segmentation often tends to produce cell slice areas less than the actual due to poor signal to noise ratio in images and that is the reason why we choose a Minimum Volume Enclosing Ellipsoid over mean or best-fit ellipsoids. We tested the proposed computational method on time-lapse CLSM images of Shoot Apical Meristem (SAM) cells of model plant Arabidopsis Thaliana. The volume estimates of individual cells are reasonably close to what is expected from biological point of view.

References

  1. T. Chan and L. Vese. Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 10:266--277, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. J. Errington, M. D. Fricker, J. L. Wood, A. C. Hall, and N. S. White. Four-dimensional imaging of living chondrocytes in cartilage using confocal microscopy: a pragmatic approach. Am. J. Physiol., 272(3):C1040--1051, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. J. Farinas, M. Kneen, M. Moore, and A. Verkman. Plasma Membrane Water Permeability of Cultured Cells and Epithelia Measured by Light Microscopy with Spatial Filtering. J. Gen. Physiol., 110(3):283--296, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. J. C. Fletcher. Shoot and floral meristem maintenance in arabidopsis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 53:45--66, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. L. G. Khachiyan. Rounding of polytopes in the real number model of computation. Math. Oper. Res., 21(2):307--320, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. P. Kumar and E. A. Yildirim. Minimum-volume enclosing ellipsoids and core sets. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 126:1--21, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. K. Li and T. Kanade. Cell population tracking and lineage construction using multiple-model dynamics filters and spatiotemporal optimization. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Microscopic Image Analysis with Applications in Biology (MIAAB), September 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Liu, R. K. Yadav, A. Roy-Chowdhury, and G. V. Reddy. Automated tracking of stem cell lineages of arabidopsis shoot apex using local graph matching. Plant journal. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 62(1):135--147, April 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. F. Maes, A. Collignon, D. V, G. Marchal, and P. Suetens. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE transactions on Medical Imaging, 16:187--198, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. McManus, J. Fischbarg, A. Sun, S. Hebert, and K. Strange. Laser light-scattering system for studying cell volume regulation and membrane transport processes. Am. J. Physiol., 265(2):C562--570, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. N. Moshtagh. Minimum volume enclosing ellipsoids.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. T. Nakahari, M. Murakami, H. Yoshida, M. Miyamoto, Y. Sohma, and Y. Imai. Decrease in rat submandibular acinar cell volume during ACh stimulation. Am. J. Physiol., 258(6):G878--886, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. P. Sun and R. M. Freund. Computation of minimum volume covering ellipsoids. Operations Research, 52:690--706, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. P. Viola and W. M. Wells. Alignment by maximization of mutual information. International Journal of Computer Vision, 24(2):137--154, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Q. Zhu, P. Tekola, J. Baak, and J. Beliën. Measurement by confocal laser scanning microscopy of the volume of epidermal nuclei in thick skin sections. Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol., 16(2):145--52, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Cell volume estimation from a sparse collection of noisy confocal image slices

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ICVGIP '10: Proceedings of the Seventh Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing
            December 2010
            533 pages
            ISBN:9781450300605
            DOI:10.1145/1924559

            Copyright © 2010 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 12 December 2010

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate95of286submissions,33%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader