Julian Harty
Abstract
Automated usability tests can be valuable companions to in-person tests.
Index Terms
- Finding usability bugs with automated tests
Recommendations
Finding Usability Bugs with Automated Tests: Automated usability tests can be valuable companions to in-person tests.
System AdministrationIdeally, all software should be easy to use and accessible for a wide range of people; however, even software that appears to be modern and intuitive often falls short of the most basic usability and accessibility goals. Why does this happen? One reason ...
Finding bugs by isolating unit tests
ESEC/FSE '11: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSOFT symposium and the 13th European conference on Foundations of software engineeringEven in simple programs there are hidden assumptions and dependencies between units that are not immediately visible in each involved unit. These dependencies are generally hard to identify and locate, and can lead to subtle faults that are often missed,...
Model-based testing leveraged for automated web tests
AbstractAgile methods and their practices have fostered the widespread presence of automated test cases. Such test cases have been successfully and extensively adopted to test different software levels, from unit tests (e.g., JUnit) to end-to-end Web ...
Reviews
Roy W Wilson
Using automated tests (as a complement to in-person tests) to find usability/accessibility bugs is certainly a worthy goal. Because my initial interest in this article arose from the immediate task of developing a BlackBerry (Java rather than Web-based) application, I was disappointed to discover that it focuses exclusively on Web software. (This is contrary to the broader scope suggested in its title.) Nevertheless, the author effectively argues for the importance of such testing and explains why such bugs occur. We must remember, though, that the adoption of test automation tools is sometimes inhibited by the need for more advanced technical and programming skills. In the context of Google, the author provides a relatively detailed discussion of how one can test keyboard navigation using the WebDriver (Selenium 2.0) tool. Despite the availability of a WebDriver implementation for the BlackBerry mobile platform, BlackBerry developer forums contain no reference to either WebDriver or Selenium. Whether this says more about the BlackBerry developer community or the WebDriver tool, I cannot say. In general, Web developers might find this article useful. That being said, it is too long. The inclusion of a few diagrams might have better indicated WebDriver's usability. Online Computing Reviews Service
Access critical reviews of Computing literature here
Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.
Comments