David D. Lewis
- 1.P. J. Hayes. Intelligent high-volume text processing using shallow, domain-specific techniques, in Paul. S. Jacobs, editor, Text-Based Intelligent Systems: Current Research zn Text Analyszs, Information Extraction, and Retrieval, pages 227-241. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, Nil, 1992. Google Scholar
- 2.P. Biebricher, N. Fuhr, G. Lustig, M. Schwantner, and G. Knorz. The automatic indexing system AIR/PHYS--from research to application. In Proc. SIGIR-88, pages 333--342, 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3.W. G. Cochran. Samphng Techniques. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 3rd edition, 1977.Google Scholar
- 4.G. Salton and C. Buckley. Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(4):288-297, 1990.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 5.W. A. Gale, K. W. Church, and D. Yarowsky. A method for disambiguating word senses in a large corpus. Computers and the Humanitzes, 26:415-439, 1993.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 6.B. K. Ghosh. A brief history of sequential analysis, in B. K. Ghosh and P. K. Sen, editors, Handbook of Sequential Analyszs, chapter 1, pages 1-19. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1991.Google Scholar
- 7.D. Angluin. Queries and concept learning. Machine Learning, 2:319-342, 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.M. Plutowski and H. White. Selecting concise training sets from clean data. IEEE Transactzons on Neural Networks, 4(2):305-318, March 1993.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9.D. Cohn, L. Atlas, and R. Ladner. Improving generalization with self-directed learning, 1992. To appear in Machine Learnzng. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.D. J. C. MacKay. The evidence framework applied to classification networks. Neural Computat,on, 4:720-736, 1992.Google Scholar
- 11.H. S. Seung, M. Opper, and H. Sompolinsky. Query by committee. In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual A CM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, pages 287-294, 1992. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.T. M. Mitchell. Generalization as search. Artificial Intell, gence, 18:203-226, 1982.Google Scholar
- 13.Y. Freund, It. S. Seung, E. Shamir, and N. Tishby. Information, prediction, and query by committee. In Advances ,n Neural Informatzons Processing Systems 5, San Mateo, CA, 1992. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14.J. Hwang, J. J. Choi, S. Oh, and R. J. Marks II. Query-based learning applied to partially trained multilayer perceptrons. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2(1):131-136, January 1991.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 15.D. T. Davis and J. Hwang. Attentional focus training by boundary region data selection. In International Joznt Conference on Neural Networks, pages 1-676 to 1-681, Baltimore, MD, June 7-11 1992.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 16.P. E. Hart. The condensed nearest neighbor rule. IEEE Transactions on Informal,on Theory, IT-14:515-516, May 1968.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 17.P. E. Utgoff. Improved training via incremental learning. In Szxth International Workshop on Machine Learning, pages 362-365, 1989. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 18.N. Fuhr. Models for retrieval with probabilistic indexing. Information Processing and Management, 25(1):55-72, 1989. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 19.D. D. Lewis. An evaluation of phrasal and clustered representations on a text categorization task. In Proc. SIGIR-92, pages 37-50, 1992. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 20.M. E. Maron. Automatic indexing: An experimental inquiry. Journal of the Associat,on }:or Computing Machinery, 8:404-417, 1961. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 21.W. S. Cooper. Some inconsistencies and misnomers in probabilistic information retrieval. In Proc. SIGItt-91, pages 57-61, 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 22.P. McCullagh and J. A. Nelder. Generalized Linear Models. Chapman ~ Hall, London, 2nd edition, 1989.Google Scholar
- 23.W. S. Cooper, F. C. Gey, and D. P. Dabney. Probabilistic retrieval based on staged logistic regression. In Proc. SIGIR-92, pages 198-210, 1992. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 24.N. Fuhr and U. Pfeifer. Combining model-oriented and description-oriented approaches for probabilistic indexing. In Proc. SIGIR-91, pages 46-56, 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 25.S. Robertson and J. Bovey. Statistical problems in the application of probabilistic models to information retrieval. Report 5739, British Library, London, 1982.Google Scholar
- 26.W. A. Gale and K. W. Church. Poor estimates of context are worse than none. In Speech and Natural Language Workshop, pages 283-287, San Mateo, CA, June 1990. DARPA, Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 27.R. O. Duda and P. E. Hart. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1973.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 28.N. Goldstein, editor. The Assoczated Press Stylebook and L~bcl Manual. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1992.Google Scholar
- 29.W. B. Croft and D. J. Harper. Using probabilistic models of document retrieval without relevance feedback. Journal of Documentat,on, 35(4):285-295, 1979.Google Scholar
- 30.C. J. van Rijsbergen. Information Retrieval. Butterworths, London, second edition, 1979. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 31.A. Bookstein. Information retrieval: A sequential learning process. Yournal of the American Society for Information Science, 34:331-342, September 1983.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 32.David D. Lewis and Jason Catlett. Heterogeneous uncertainty sampling for supervised learning. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Machzne Learning, 1994. To appear.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers
Recommendations
Vertical Ensemble Co-Training for Text Classification
Regular PapersHigh-quality, labeled data is essential for successfully applying machine learning methods to real-world text classification problems. However, in many cases, the amount of labeled data is very small compared to that of the unlabeled, and labeling ...
Reduction of training noises for text classifiers
ACIIDS'13: Proceedings of the 5th Asian conference on Intelligent Information and Database Systems - Volume Part IIAutomatic text classification (TC) is essential for the archiving and retrieval of texts, which are main ways of recording information and expertise. Previous studies thus have developed many text classifiers. They often employed training texts to build ...
Training more discriminative multi-class classifiers for hand detection
In this paper, an effective algorithm is developed to learn more discriminative multi-class classifiers for achieving more accurate hand detection. At each round of boosting, a set of shared stump classifiers with relatively low discrimination power are ...
Comments