skip to main content
10.5555/1866795.1866799dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiunlpbeaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Annotating ESL errors: challenges and rewards

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 June 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present a corrected and error-tagged corpus of essays written by non-native speakers of English. The corpus contains 63000 words and includes data by learners of English of nine first language backgrounds. The annotation was performed at the sentence level and involved correcting all errors in the sentence. Error classification includes mistakes in preposition and article usage, errors in grammar, word order, and word choice. We show an analysis of errors in the annotated corpus by error categories and first language backgrounds, as well as inter-annotator agreement on the task.

We also describe a computer program that was developed to facilitate and standardize the annotation procedure for the task. The program allows for the annotation of various types of mistakes and was used in the annotation of the corpus.

References

  1. }}J. Bitchener, S. Young and D. Cameron. 2005. The Effect of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. }}A. J. Carlson and J. Rosen and D. Roth. 2001. Scaling Up Context Sensitive Text Correction. IAAI, 45--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. }}M. Chodorow, J. Tetreault and N-R. Han. 2007. Detection of Grammatical Errors Involving Prepositions. Proceedings of the Fourth ACL-SIGSEM Workshop on Prepositions. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. }}E. Dagneaux, S. Denness and S. Granger. 1998. Computer-aided Error Analysis. System, 26:163--174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. }}G. Dalgish. 1985. Computer-assisted ESL Research. CALICO Journal, 2(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. }}G. Dalgish. 1991. Computer-Assisted Error Analysis and Courseware Design: Applications for ESL in the Swedish Context. CALICO Journal, 9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. }}R. De Felice and S. Pulman. 2008. A Classifier-Based Approach to Preposition and Determiner Error Correction in L2 English. In Proceedings of COLING-08. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. }}A. Díaz-Negrillo and J. Fernández-Domíguez. 2006. Error Tagging Systems for Learner Corpora. RESLA, 19:83--102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. }}J. Eeg-Olofsson and O. Knuttson. 2003. Automatic Grammar Checking for Second Language Learners - the Use of Prepositions. In Nodalida.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. }}M. Gamon, J. Gao, C. Brockett, A. Klementiev, W. Dolan, D. Belenko and L. Vanderwende. 2008. Using Contextual Speller Techniques and Language Modeling for ESL Error Correction. Proceedings of IJCNLP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. }}A. R. Golding and D. Roth. 1996. Applying Winnow to Context-Sensitive Spelling Correction. ICML, 182--190.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. }}A. R. Golding and D. Roth. 1999. A Winnow based approach to Context-Sensitive Spelling Correction. Machine Learning, 34(1--3):107--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. }}S. Granger, E. Dagneaux and F. Meunier. 2002. International Corpus of Learner EnglishGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. }}S. Granger. 2002. A Bird's-eye View of Learner Corpus Research. Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching, Eds. S. Granger, J. Hung and S. Petch-Tyson, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 3--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. }}S. Gui and H. Yang. 2003. Zhongguo Xuexizhe Yingyu Yuliaohu. (Chinese Learner English Corpus). Shanghai Waiyu Jiaoyu Chubanshe. (In Chinese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. }}N. Han, M. Chodorow and C. Leacock. 2006. Detecting Errors in English Article Usage by Non-native Speakers. Journal of Natural Language Engineering, 12(2):115--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. }}E. Izumi, K. Uchimoto, T. Saiga and H. Isahara. 2003. Automatic Error Detection in the Japanese Leaners English Spoken Data. ACL. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. }}E. Izumi, K. Uchimoto and H. Isahara. 2004. The Overview of the SST Speech Corpus of Japanese Learner English and Evaluation through the Experiment on Automatic Detection of Learners' Errors. LREC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. }}E. Izumi, K. Uchimoto and H. Isahara. 2004. The NICT JLE Corpus: Exploiting the Language Learner's Speech Database for Research and Education. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 12(2):119--125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. }}R. Nagata, A. Kawai, K. Morihiro, and N. Isu. 2006. A Feedback-Augmented Method for Detecting Errors in the Writing of Learners of English. ACL/COLING. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. }}N. Pravec. 2002. Survey of learner corpora. ICAME Journal, 26:81--114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. }}A. Rozovskaya and D. Roth 2010. Training Paradigms for Correcting Errors in Grammar and Usage. In Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT, Los-Angeles, CA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. }}J. Tetreault and M. Chodorow. 2008. Native Judgments of Non-Native Usage: Experiments in Preposition Error Detection. COLING Workshop on Human Judgments in Computational Linguistics, Manchester, UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. }}J. Tetreault and M. Chodorow. 2008. The Ups and Downs of Preposition Error Detection in ESL Writing. COLING, Manchester, UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Annotating ESL errors: challenges and rewards

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image DL Hosted proceedings
          IUNLPBEA '10: Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Fifth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications
          June 2010
          105 pages

          Publisher

          Association for Computational Linguistics

          United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 5 June 2010

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          IUNLPBEA '10 Paper Acceptance Rate13of28submissions,46%Overall Acceptance Rate13of28submissions,46%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader