skip to main content
research-article

Light reallocation for high contrast projection using an analog micromirror array

Published:15 December 2010Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We demonstrate for the first time a proof of concept projector with a secondary array of individually controllable, analog micromirrors added to improve the contrast and peak brightness of conventional projectors. The micromirrors reallocate the light of the projector lamp from the dark parts towards the light parts of the image, before it reaches the primary image modulator. Each element of the analog micromirror array can be tipped/tilted to divert portions of the light from the lamp in two dimensions. By directing these mirrors on an image-dependent basis, we can increase both the peak intensity of the projected image as well as its contrast.

In this paper, we describe and analyze the optical design for projectors using this light reallocation approach. We also discuss software algorithms to compute the best light reallocation pattern for a given input image, using the constraints of real hardware. We perform extensive simulations of this process to evaluate image quality and performance characteristics of this process. Finally, we present a first proof-of-concept implementation of this approach using a prototype analog micromirror device.

References

  1. Agarwal, P., and Varadarajan, K. 2004. A near-linear constant-factor approximation for euclidean bipartite matching? In Proceedings of the twentieth annual symposium on Computational geometry, ACM New York, NY, USA, 247--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bimber, O., and Iwai, D. 2008. Superimposing dynamic range. ACM Trans. Graph. (Proc. Siggraph Asia) 27, 5, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bloom, D., 1997. The grating light valve: revolutionizing display technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brennesholtz, M. S., and Stupp, E. H. 2008. Projection Displays, 2nd ed. Wiley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Damberg, G., Seetzen, H., Ward, G., Heidrich, W., and Whitehead, L. 2007. High Dynamic Range Projection Systems. Proceedings of the 2006 Society for Information Display Annual Symposium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Debevec, P. 2005. A median cut algorithm for light probe sampling. In SIGGRAPH '05: ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Posters, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Derra, G., Moench, H., Fischer, E., Giese, H., Hechtfischer, U., Heusler, G., Koerber, A., Niemann, U., Noertemann, F., Pekarski, P., et al. 2005. UHP lamp systems for projection applications. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-LONDON-D APPLIED PHYSICS 38, 17, 2995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dewald, D., Segler, D., and Penn, S. 2004. Advances in contrast enhancement for DLP projection displays. Journal of the Society for Information Display 11, 177--181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Halbach, K. 1964. Matrix representation of Gaussian optics. American Journal of Physics 32, 90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Hecht, E. 2002. Optics, 4th ed. Addison Wesley, San Francisco, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Heckbert, P. 1982. Color image quantization for frame buffer display. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics 16, 3, 297--307. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hoskinson, R., and Stoeber, B. 2008. High-dynamic range image projection using an auxiliary mems mirror array. Optics Express 16, 7361--7368.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Hoskinson, R., Buescher, D., Hampl, S., Holle, M., and Stoeber, B. 2010. Arrays of large-area, large-angle tip/tilt micromirrors for use in a high-contrast projector. In submission.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Iisaka, H., Toyooka, T., Yoshida, S., and Nagata, M. 2003. Novel Projection System Based on an Adaptive Dynamic Range Control Concept. In Procoeedings Int Disp Workshops, vol. 10, 1553--1556.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuhn, H. 1955. The Hungarian method for the assignment and transportation problems. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 2, 83--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kusakabe, Y., Kanazawa, M., Nojiri, Y., Furuya, M., and Yoshimura, M. 2009. A high-dynamic-range and high-resolution projector with dual modulation. In Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 7241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mantiuk, R., Daly, S., Myszkowski, K., and Seidel, H.-P. 2005. Predicting visible differences in high dynamic range images - model and its calibration. In Human Vision and Electronic Imaging X, IS&T/SPIE's 17th Annual Symposium on Electronic Imaging (2005), B. E. Rogowitz, T. N. Pappas, and S. J. Daly, Eds., vol. 5666, 204--214.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Nagahara, H., Kuthirummal, S., Zhou, C., and Nayar, S. 2008. Flexible Depth of Field Photography. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Pavlovych, A., and Stuerzlinger, W. 2005. A High-Dynamic Range Projection System. Progress in biomedical optics and imaging 6, 39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Seetzen, H., Heidrich, W., Stuerzlinger, W., Ward, G., Whitehead, L., Trentacoste, M., Ghosh, A., and Vorozcovs, A. 2004. High dynamic range display systems. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Siggraph 2004) 23, 3, 760--768. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Seetzen, H. 2009. High Dynamic Range Display and Projection Systems. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Texas Instruments. 2005. DMD 0.7 XGA 12 DDR DMD Discovery.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Toyooka, T., Yoshida, S., and Iisaka, H. 2005. Illumination control system for adaptive dynamic range control. Journal of the Society for Information Display 13, 105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Tsai, J., Chiou, S., Hsieh, T., Sun, C., Hah, D., and Wu, M. 2008. Two-axis MEMS scanners with radial vertical combdrive actuators---design, theoretical analysis, and fabrication. Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics 10, 044006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Light reallocation for high contrast projection using an analog micromirror array

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
          ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 29, Issue 6
          December 2010
          480 pages
          ISSN:0730-0301
          EISSN:1557-7368
          DOI:10.1145/1882261
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2010 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 15 December 2010
          Published in tog Volume 29, Issue 6

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader