skip to main content
10.1145/1864349.1864355acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Examining micro-payments for participatory sensing data collections

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 September 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

The rapid adoption of mobile devices that are able to capture and transmit a wide variety of sensing modalities (media and location) has enabled a new data collection paradigm - participatory sensing. Participatory sensing initiatives organize individuals to gather sensed information using mobile devices through cooperative data collection. A major factor in the success of these data collection projects is sustained, high quality participation. However, since data capture requires a time and energy commitment from individuals, incentives are often introduced to motivate participants. In this work, we investigate the use of micro-payments as an incentive model. We define a set of metrics that can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of incentives and report on findings from a pilot study using various micro-payment schemes in a university campus sustainability initiative.

References

  1. }}D. Aanensen, D. Huntley, E. Feil, et al. EpiCollect: Linking Smartphones to Web Applications for Epidemiology, Ecology and Community Data Collection. Public Library of Science, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. }}T. Abdelzaher, Y. Anokwa, P. Boda, J. Burke, D. Estrin, L. Guibas, A. Kansal, S. Madden, and J. Reich. Mobiscopes for human spaces. IEEE Pervasive Computing, pages 20--29, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. }}Amazon. Mturk, March 2010. http://mturk.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. }}J. Armstrong. Monetary incentives in mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, pages 111--116, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. }}J. Burke, D. Estrin, M. Hansen, A. Parker, N. Ramanathan, S. Reddy, and M. Srivastava. Participatory sensing. In World Sensor Web Workshop. ACM, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. }}A. Campbell, S. Eisenman, N. Lane, E. Miluzzo, and R. Peterson. People-centric urban sensing. In Conference on Wireless Internet. IEEE, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. }}M. Couper. Web Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64:464--494, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. }}L. Deng and L. Cox. Livecompare: grocery bargain hunting through participatory sensing. In HotMobile, page 4. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. }}D. Geer. E-micropayments sweat the small stuff. Computer, 37(8):19--22, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. }}P. Golle, K. Leyton-Brown, I. Mironov, and M. Lillibridge. Incentives for sharing in peer-to-peer networks. Electronic Commerce, pages 75--87, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. }}H. Laurie and P. Lynn. The use of respondent incentives on longitudinal surveys. Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, pages 205--234, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. }}W. Mason and D. Watts. Financial incentives and the performance of crowds. In ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Human Computation, pages 77--85. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. }}E. Paulos, R. Honicky, and B. Hooker. Citizen Science: Enabling Participatory Urbanism. Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics, page 414, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. }}M. Paxton and S. Benford. Experiences of participatory sensing in the wild. In Ubicomp, pages 265--274. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. }}S. Reddy, D. Estrin, and M. Srivastava. Recruitment Framework for Participatory Sensing Data Collections. In Pervasive, pages 138--155. Springer, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. }}S. Reddy, K. Shilton, G. Denisov, C. Cenizal, D. Estrin, and M. Srivastava. Biketastic: Sensing and Mapping for Better Biking. In CHI. Springer, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. }}R. Rivest and A. Shamir. PayWord and MicroMint: Two simple micropayment schemes. Security Protocols, pages 69--88, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. }}Waze. Way to go!, March 2010. http://waze.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. }}T. Yamabe, V. Lehdonvirta, H. Ito, H. Soma, H. Kimura, and T. Nakajima. Applying pervasive technologies to create economic incentives that alter consumer behavior. In Ubicomp, pages 175--184. ACM, 2009.. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Examining micro-payments for participatory sensing data collections

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '10: Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on Ubiquitous computing
      September 2010
      366 pages
      ISBN:9781605588438
      DOI:10.1145/1864349

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 September 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      UbiComp '10 Paper Acceptance Rate39of202submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader