skip to main content
10.5555/1857999.1858121dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshltConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

An unsupervised aspect-sentiment model for online reviews

Published:02 June 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the increase in popularity of online review sites comes a corresponding need for tools capable of extracting the information most important to the user from the plain text data. Due to the diversity in products and services being reviewed, supervised methods are often not practical. We present an unsuper-vised system for extracting aspects and determining sentiment in review text. The method is simple and flexible with regard to domain and language, and takes into account the influence of aspect on sentiment polarity, an issue largely ignored in previous literature. We demonstrate its effectiveness on both component tasks, where it achieves similar results to more complex semi-supervised methods that are restricted by their reliance on manual annotation and extensive knowledge sources.

References

  1. Benamara, Farah, Carmine Cesarano, Antonio Picariello, Diego Reforgiato, and V. S. Subrahmanian. 2007. Sentiment analysis: Adjectives and adverbs are better than adjectives alone. In Proc. of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Blei, David M., Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3:993--1022. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Blitzer, John, Mark Dredze, and Fernando Pereira. 2007. Biographies, bollywood, boom-boxes and blenders: Domain adaptation for sentiment classification. In Proc. of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics. ACL, Prague, Czech Republic, pages 440--447.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Briscoe, Ted and John Carroll. 2002. Robust accurate statistical annotation of general text. In Proc. of the 3rd LREC. Las Palmas, Gran Canaria, pages 1499--1504.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Fahrni, Angela and Manfred Klenner. 2008. Old Wine or Warm Beer: Target-Specific Sentiment Analysis of Adjectives. In Proc. of the Symposium on Affective Language in Human and Machine, AISB 2008 Convention. pages 60--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ganu, Gayatree, Noemie Elhadad, and Amelie Marian. 2009. Beyond the stars: Improving rating predictions using review text content. In WebDB.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hatzivassiloglou, Vasileios and Kathleen R. McKeown. 1997. Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. In Proc. of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. ACL, Madrid, Spain, pages 174--181. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hu, Minqing and Bing Liu. 2004. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In KDD '04: Proc. of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pages 168--177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jijkoun, Valentin and Katja Hofmann. 2009. Generating a non-english subjectivity lexicon: Relations that matter. In Proc. of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL (EACL 2009). ACL, Athens, Greece, pages 398--405. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lange, Tilman, Volker Roth, Mikio L. Braun, and Joachim M. Buhmann. 2004. Stability-based validation of clustering solutions. Neural Comput. 16(6):1299--1323. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Lerman, Kevin, Sasha Blair-Goldensohn, and Ryan McDonald. 2009. Sentiment summarization: evaluating and learning user preferences. In EACL '09: Proc. of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. ACL, Mor-ristown, NJ, USA, pages 514--522. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Levine, Erel and Eytan Domany. 2001. Resampling method for unsupervised estimation of cluster validity. Neural Comput. 13(11):2573--2593. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Mei, Qiaozhu, Xu Ling, Matthew Wondra, Hang Su, and ChengXiang Zhai. 2007. Topic sentiment mixture: modeling facets and opinions in weblogs. In WWW '07: Proc. of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pages 171--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Niu, Zheng-Yu, Dong-Hong Ji, and Chew-Lim Tan. 2007. I2r: three systems for word sense discrimination, chinese word sense disambiguation, and english word sense disambiguation. In SemEval '07: Proc. of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations. ACL, Morristown, NJ, USA, pages 177--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Pang, Bo and Lillian Lee. 2005. Seeing stars: Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales. In Proc. of the ACL. pages 115--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Pang, Bo and Lillian Lee. 2008. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 2(1--2):1--135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Pang, Bo, Lillian Lee, and Shivakumar Vaithyanathan. 2002. Thumbs up?: sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In EMNLP '02: Proc. of the conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing. ACL, Morristown, NJ, USA, pages 79--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Popescu, Ana-Maria and Oren Etzioni. 2005. Extracting product features and opinions from reviews. In HLT '05: Proc. of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. ACL, Morristown, NJ, USA, pages 339--346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Snyder, Benjamin and Regina Barzilay. 2007. Multiple aspect ranking using the good grief algorithm. In Candace L. Sidner, Tanja Schultz, Matthew Stone, and Cheng Xiang Zhai, editors, HLT-NAACL. The Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 300--307.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Titov, Ivan and Ryan McDonald. 2008a. A joint model of text and aspect ratings for sentiment summarization. In Proc. of ACL-08: HLT. ACL, Columbus, Ohio, pages 308--316.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Titov, Ivan and Ryan McDonald. 2008b. Modeling online reviews with multi-grain topic models. In WWW '08: Proc. of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, New York, NY, pages 111--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Turney, Peter. 2002. Thumbs up or thumbs down? semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Proc. of 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. ACL, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, pages 417--424. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Zagibalov, Taras and John Carroll. 2008. Automatic seed word selection for unsupervised sentiment classification of chinese text. In COLING '08: Proc. of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics. ACL, Morristown, NJ, USA, pages 1073--1080. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Zhu, X. and Z. Ghahramani. 2002. Learning from labeled and unlabeled data with label propagation. Technical report, CMU-CALD-02.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image DL Hosted proceedings
    HLT '10: Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
    June 2010
    1070 pages
    ISBN:1932432655

    Publisher

    Association for Computational Linguistics

    United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 2 June 2010

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate240of768submissions,31%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader