Motivation to transfer revisited

ABSTRACT

Should the construct 'motivation to transfer' used inhuman resource development and management research be also used in learning research? The current study revisited motivation to transfer on a sample of 128 participants of occupational health training Confirmatory factor analysis and partial least squaresbased path modeling were used to test the hypothesized dimensions and relationships among variables including social and affective cues on training transfer. Based on a combination of the theory of planned behavior, expectancy theory, and self-determination theory, we validated three dimensions of transfer motivation: autonomous motivation to transfer, controlled motivation to transfer, and intentions to transfer. Results indicate that autonomous motivation was affected by attitudes toward training content and utility reactions controlled motivation was affected by utility reactions, supervisory support, and social norms. Intentions to transfer mediated the effects of autonomous motivation on transfer three months after training. Implications of a multidisciplinary perspective combining learning sciences and human resource development are discussed.

References

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179--211.
2. Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: Amotivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2045--2068.
3. Bentler, P. M. (2005). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
4. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multipleimplications. Review of research on education, 24, 61--100.
5. Burke, L. A., & Hutchins, H. M. (2007). Training transfer: An integrative literature review Human Resource Development Review, 6, 263--296.
6. Chin, W., & Newstead, P. (1999). Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using paral least squares. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 307--341). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt.
8. Festner, D. & Gruber, H. (2008). Conditions of work environments in fostering transfer of training. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & A. Etelääpelto (Eds.), Emerging perspectives of workplaæ learning (pp. 215--231). Rotterdam: Sense.
9. Gegenfurtner, A., Festner, D., Gallenberger, W., Lehtinen, E., & Gruber, H. (2009) Predicting autonomous and controlled motivation to transfer training. International Journal of Training and Development, 13, 124--138.
10. Gegenfurtner, A., & Gruber, H. (2009, August). Do intentions mediate the transfer process? Testing the theory of planned behaviour. Paper presented at the 13th Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction Amsterdam.
11. Gegenfurtner, A., Veermans, K., Festner, D., & Gruber, H. (2009). Motivation to transfer training: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 8, 403--423.
12. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13. Hickey, D. T., Moore, A. L., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2001). The motivational and academic consequences of elementary mathematics environments: Do constructivist innovations and reforms make a difference? American Educational Research Journal, 38, 611--652
14. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: inventional criteria versus newalternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6, 1--55.
15. Järvelä, S., Volet, S., & Jäärvenoja, H. (2010). Research on motivation in collaborative learning: Moving beyond the cognitive-situative divide and combining individual and social processes Educational Psychologist, 45, 15--27.
16. Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 75--170). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
17. Kapur, M., & Kinzer, C. K. (2009). Productive failure in CSCL groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported collaborative learning 4, 21--46.
18. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
19. Lehtinen, E., & Hannula, M. M. (2006). Attentional processes, abstraction, and transfer in earlymathematical development. In L. Verschaffel, F. Dochy, M. Boekaerts, & S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends. Fifteen essays in honour of Erik De Corte (pp. 39--54). Oxford: Elsevier.
20. Leitl, J., & Zempel-Dohmen, J. (2006). Die Bedeutung des Arbeitsumfelds füür die Veränderung der Transfermotivation. {The impact of work environment on the changing level of motivation to transfer} Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 50, 92--102.
21. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84--99.
22. Machin, M. A., & Fogarty, G. J. (1997). The effects of self-efficacy, motivation to transfer, and situational constraints on transfer intentions and transfer of training. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 10, 98--115.
23. MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593--614.
24. Noe, R. A. (1986). Trainees' attributes and attitudes: Neglected influences on training effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 11, 736--749.
25. Noe, R. A., & Schmitt, N. (1986). The influence of trainee attitudes on training effectiveness: Test of a model. Personnel Psychology, 39, 497--523.
26. Pugh, K. J., & Bergin, D. A. (2006). Motivational influences on transfer. Educational Psychologist, 41, 147--160.
27. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). Smart PLS 2.0. Available at http://www.smartpls.de.
28. Tai, W.-T. (2006). Effects of training framing, general self-efficacy and training motivation on trainees' training effectiveness. Personnel Review, 35, 51--65.
29. Tuomi, Gröhn, T., & Engesrööm, Y. (2003). Conceptualizing transfer: From standard notions to developmental perspectives. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn & Y. Engeströöm (Eds.), Between school and work. New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 19--38). Oxford: Elsevier.
30. Tziner, A., Haccoun, R. R., & Kadish, A. (1991). Personal and situational characteristics of transfer of training improvement strategies. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64, 167--177.
31. Vauras, M., Salonen, P. & Kinnunen, R. (2008). Influences of group processes and interpersonal regulation on motivation, affect and achievement. In M. Maehr, S. Karabenick, & T. Urdan (Eds.) Social psychological perspectives. Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 15, pp. 275--314). New York: Emerald.
32. Velada, R., Caetano, A., Bates, R., & Holton, E. (2009). Learning transfer--validation of the learning transfer system inventory in Portugal. Journal of European Industrial Training, 33, 635--656.
33. Vroom, V. H. (2005). On the origins of expectancy theory. In K. Smith & M. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds in management: The process of theory development (pp. 239--258). Oxford: Oxford University Press.