skip to main content
10.1145/1822348.1822374acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfdgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

This is how we play it: what a mega-LAN can teach us about games

Published:19 June 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Using data gathered through our participant observation and informal interviews at DreamHack Winter 2005 and 2009 we explore a number of themes that not only provide insight into aspects of face-to-face real-time play at LAN parties but also highlight considerations for game studies more generally. In particular, we focus on the heterogeneity of play and experience, the role of spectatorship in computer gaming, the public performance of leisure and gamer identity, and the growing presence of women in game culture. We conclude by suggesting that researchers should begin to consider the much larger trend in which this form of leisure activity is integrating itself into mainstream pop/youth/network culture.

References

  1. Swalwell, M. 2006. Multi-player computer gaming: Better than playing (PC games) with yourself. Reconstruction: Studies in Contemporary Culture, 6:1. http://reconstruction.eserver.org/061/swalwell.shtml.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Swalwell, M. 2009. Lan gaming groups: Snapshots from an Australasian case study, 1999--2008. In Gaming Cultures and Place in the Asia-Pacific Region, L. Hjorth and D. Chan, Eds. London: Routledge, 117--140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jansz, J. and Martens, L. 2005. Gaming at a LAN event: The social context of playing video games. New Media & Society, vol. 7 no. 3: 333--355.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jörissen, B. 2004. Virtual reality on the stage: Performing community at a LAN party. In Envision: The new media age and everyday life, P. Hernwall, Ed. Stockholm: Stockholm University, 23--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Fetscherin, M., Kaskiris, C., and Wallenberg, F. 2005. Gaming or sharing at LAN-parties: What is going on? In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Automated Production of Cross Media Content for MultiChannel Distribution (Florence, Italy, November 30--December 2, 2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hertzberg Johnson, B. 2000. The internet generation and "The Gathering." Doomed to Free Choice workshop (Dubrovnik, May 22--28, 2000). http://publications.uu.se/journals/1651-0593/114.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Simon, B. 2007. Geek chic: Machine aesthetics, digital gaming, and the cultural politics of the case mod. Games and Culture, vol. 2, no. 3: 175--193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Aarseth, E. 1997. Cybertext: Perspectives on ergodic literature. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Klevjer, R. 2002. In defence of cutscenes. In Computer Games and Digital Cultures Conference Proceedings. Tampere: University of Tampere Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Newman, J. 2002. In search of the videogame player. New Media & Society, 4(3): 405--422.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Polson, D. and Caceres, M. 2005. Lesser-known worlds: Bridging the telematic flows with Located Human Experience Through Game Design. In Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 Conference: Changing Views - Worlds in Play (Vancouver, June 16--20, 2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Swalwell, M. 2008. Movement and kinaesthetic responsiveness: A neglected pleasure. In The Pleasures of Computer Gaming, M. Swalwell and J. Wilson, Eds. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 72--93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Bayliss, P. 2007. Notes toward a sense of embodied gameplay. In Proceedings of DiGRA 2007 Conference: Situated Play (Tokyo, Japan, September 24--28, 2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lahti, M. 2003. As we become machines. In The Videogame Theory Reader, M. J. P. Wolf and B. Perron, Eds. New York: Routledge, 157--170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Reeves, S., Brown, B., and Laurier, E. 2009. Experts at play: Understanding skilled expertise. Games and Culture, vol. 4, no. 3: 205--227.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Juul, J. 2009. Fear of failing: The many meanings of difficulty in video games. In The Video Game Theory Reader 2. B. Perron, B. and M. J. P. Wolf, Eds. New York: Routledge, 237--252.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Bryce, J. and Rutter, J. 2002. Killing like a girl. In Computer Games and Digital Cultures Conference Proceedings. Tampere: University of Tampere Press, 243--256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Bryce, J. and Rutter, J. 2003. The gendering of computer gaming: Experience and space. In Leisure Cultures: Investigations in Sport, Media and Technology, S. Fleming & I. Jones, Eds. Leisure Studies Association, 3--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ahmed, S. 2006. Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Durham: Duke University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Dworkin, S. 2003. A woman's place is in the cardiovascular room?? Gender relations, the body, and the gym. In Athletic Intruders, A. Bolin & J. Granskog, Eds. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 131--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Schott, G. R. and Horrel, K. R. 2000. Girl gamers and their relationship with the gaming culture. Convergence, vol. 6, no. 4: 36--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Lin, H. 2008. Body, space, and gendered gaming experiences: A cultural geography of homes, cybercafés, and dormitories. In Beyond Barbie & Mortal Kombat: New Perspectives on Gender and Gaming, Y. B. Kafai, C. Heeter, J. Denner, and J. Y. Sun, Eds. Cambridge: MIT Press, 51--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Taylor, T. L. 2008. Becoming a player: Networks, structure, and imagined futures. In Beyond Barbie & Mortal Kombat: New Perspectives on Gender and Gaming, Y. B. Kafai, C. Heeter, J. Denner, and J. Y. Sun, Eds. Cambridge: MIT Press, 51--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Jakobsson, M. 2007. Playing with the rules: Social and cultural aspects of game rules in a console game club. In Proceedings of DiGRA 2007 Conference: Situated Play (Tokyo, Japan, September 24--28, 2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Taylor, T. L. 2006. Play Between Worlds: Exploring Online Game Culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Calleja, G. 2007. Digital Games as Designed Experience: Reframing the Concept of Immersion. PhD Dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Nordli, H. 2003. The Gathering Experience. A User Study of a Computer Party. SIGIS Report. Available at http://pdf.textfiles.com/academics/sigis_d04_2.01_ntnu1.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Lowood, H. 2008. Found Technology: Players as Innovators in the Making of Machinima. In Digital Youth, Innovation, and the Unexpected, T. McPherson, Ed. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 165--196.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. This is how we play it: what a mega-LAN can teach us about games

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            FDG '10: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games
            June 2010
            306 pages
            ISBN:9781605589374
            DOI:10.1145/1822348

            Copyright © 2010 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 19 June 2010

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate152of415submissions,37%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader