skip to main content
10.1145/1814433.1814441acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobisysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

MAUI: making smartphones last longer with code offload

Published:15 June 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents MAUI, a system that enables fine-grained energy-aware offload of mobile code to the infrastructure. Previous approaches to these problems either relied heavily on programmer support to partition an application, or they were coarse-grained requiring full process (or full VM) migration. MAUI uses the benefits of a managed code environment to offer the best of both worlds: it supports fine-grained code offload to maximize energy savings with minimal burden on the programmer. MAUI decides at run-time which methods should be remotely executed, driven by an optimization engine that achieves the best energy savings possible under the mobile device's current connectivity constrains. In our evaluation, we show that MAUI enables: 1) a resource-intensive face recognition application that consumes an order of magnitude less energy, 2) a latency-sensitive arcade game application that doubles its refresh rate, and 3) a voice-based language translation application that bypasses the limitations of the smartphone environment by executing unsupported components remotely.

References

  1. R. Balan, J. Flinn, M. Satyanarayanan, S. Sinnamohideen, and H.-I. Yang. The Case for Cyber Foraging. In The 10th ACM SIGOPS European Workshop, Saint-Emilion, France, September 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. K. Balan. Simplifying Cyber Foraging. PhD thesis, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. K. Balan, M. Satyanarayanan, S. Park, and T. Okoshi. Tactics-Based Remote Execution for Mobile Computing. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys), San Francisco, CA, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Birrell, G. Nelson, S. Owicki, and E. Wobber. Network Objects. In Proc. of the Fourteenth ACM Symposium on Operatings Systems Principles (SOSP), 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. L. Cardelli. A Language with Distributed Scope. In Proc. of the 22nd Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL), 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B.-G. Chun and P. Maniatis. Augmented Smartphone Applications Through Clone Cloud Execution. In Proc. of the 8th Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems (HotOS), Monte Verita, Switzerland, May 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C. Clark, K. Fraser, S. Hand, J. G. Hansen, E. Jul, C. Limpach, I. Pratt, and A. Warfield. Live Migration of Virtual Machines. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. F. Douglis and J. Ousterhout. Transparent Process Migration: Design Alternatives and the Sprite Implementation. Software -- Practice and Experience, 21(8):757--785, August 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Flinn, D. Narayanan, and M. Satyanarayanan. Self-Tuned Remote Execution for Pervasive Computing. In Proc. of the 8th Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems (HotOS), Schloss Elmau, Germany, May 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Flinn, S. Park, and M. Satyanarayanan. Balancing Performance, Energy, and Quality in Pervasive Computing. In Proc. of the 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), Vienna, Austria, July 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Flinn, S. Sinnamohideen, N. Tolia, and M. Satyanaryanan. Data Staging on Untrusted Surrogates. In Proceedings of the 2nd USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST), San Francisco, CA, March -- April 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. S. Gray. Agent Tcl: a flexible and secure mobile-agent system. In TCLTK'96: Proceedings of the 4th USENIX Tcl/Tk Workshop, 1996, Monterey, CA, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. X. Gu, K. Nahrstedt, A. Messer, I. Greenberg, and D. Milojicic. Adaptive Offloading Inference for Delivering Applications in Pervasive Computing Environments. In Proceedings of the First IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. D. Hesse. Sprint's CEO Dan Hesse Chats with Charlie Rose. http://blueroomsolution.com/showthread.php?t=5689, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Huang, Q. Xu, B. Tiwana, Z. M. Mao, M. Zhang, and P. Bahl. Anatomizing Application Performance Differences on Smartphones. In Proc. of the 8th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys), San Francisco, CA, June 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. G. C. Hunt and M. L. Scott. The Coign Automatic Distributed Partitioning System. In Proc. of the 3rd Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI), New Orleans, LA, February 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. D. Joseph, A. F. deLespinasse, J. A. Tauber, D. K. Gifford, and M. F. Kaashoek. Rover: A Toolkit for Mobile Information Access. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP), 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. E. Jul, H. Levy, N. Hutchinson, and A. Black. Fine-Grained Mobility in the Emerald System. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 6(1):109--133, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A. Kansal and F. Zhao. Fine-Grained Energy Profiling for Power-Aware Application Design. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Hot Topics in Measurement & Modeling of Computer Systems (HotMetrics), Annapolis, MD, June 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. M. Kim, L. Cox, and B. Noble. Safety, Visibility, and Performance in a Wide-Area File System. In Proc. of the 3rd Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI), Boston, MA, Dec. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. Kincaid. YouTube Mobile Uploads Up 400% Since iPhone 3GS Launch. http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/25/youtube-mobile-uploads-up-400-since-iphone-3gs-launch/, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. P. Kougiouris. Use Reflection to Discover and Assess the Most Common Types in the .NET Framework. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc188926.aspx#S3, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. U. Kremer, J. Hicks, and J. M. Rehg. Compiler-Directed Remote Task Execution for Power Management. In Proceedings of The Workshop on Compilers and Operating Systems for Low Power (COLP), Philadelphia, PA, October 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. Lewin. iPhone Users 30 Times More Likely To Watch YouTube Videos. http://www.podcastingnews.com/2008/03/19/iphone-users-30-times-watch-youtube-videos/, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Monsoon Solutions Inc. Monsoon Power Monitor. http://www.msoon.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. S. Mullender, G. van Rossum, A. Tanenbaum, R. van Renesse, and H. van Staveren. Amoeba -- A Distributed Operating System for the 1990s. IEEE Computer, 23: 44--53, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. National Office of Pollution Prevention (Canada). Canadian Consumer Battery Baseline Study -- Final Report. Submitted to Environment Canada, http://www.ec.gc.ca/nopp/docs/rpt/battery/en/toc.cfm, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. M. Neubauer and P. Thiemann. From Sequential Programs to Multi-Tier Applications by Program Transformation. In Proc. of the Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL), Long Beach, CA, January 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. R. Newton, S. Toledo, L. Girod, H. Balakrishnan, and S. Madden. Wishbone: Profile-based Partitioning for Sensornet Applications. In Proceedings of the 6th USENIX symposium on Networked systems design and implementation (NSDI), Boston, MA, April 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. B. Noble, M. Satyanarayanan, D. Narayanan, J. Tilton, J. Flinn, and K. Walker. Agile Application-Aware Adaptation for Mobility. In Proc. of the ACM Symposium on Operating System Principles (SOSP), 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. S. Osman, D. Subhraveti, G. Su, and J. Nieh. The Design and Implementation of Zap: A System for Migrating Computing Environments. In Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI), 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. M. R. Palacin. Recent advances in rechargeable battery materials: a chemists perspective. Chem Soc Review, 38: 2565--2575, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Physics2D.Net. http://code.google.com/p/physics2d/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. R. A. Powers. Batteries for low power electronics. Proceedings of the IEEE, 83: 687--693, April 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. R. S. Prasad, M. Murray, C. Dovrolis, and K. Claffy. Bandwidth Estimation: Metrifcs, Measurement Techniques, and Tools. IEEE Network, 17(6): 27--35, Nov--Dec 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. J. Richter. CLR via C#. Microsoft Press; 2nd edition, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. M. Satyanarayanan, P. Bahl, R. Caceres, and N. Davies. The Case for VM-based Cloudlets in Mobile Computing. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 8(4), 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. S. Savage. Sting: a TCP-based Network Measurement Tool. In Proceedings of the 2nd USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems (USITS), Boulder, CO, October 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Y.-Y. Su and J. Flinn. Slingshot: Deploying Stateful Services in Wireless Hotspots. In Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys), Seattle, WA, June 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Y. Weinsberg, D. Dolev, T. Anker, M. Ben-Yehuda, and P. Wyckoff. Tapping into the Fountain of CPUs -- On Operating System Support for Programmable Devices. In Proc. of the 13th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS), 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. C. Young and Y. N. Lakshman. Protium, an Infrastructure for Partitioned Applications. In Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems (HotOS), Schloss Elmau, Germany, May 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. MAUI: making smartphones last longer with code offload

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobiSys '10: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services
      June 2010
      382 pages
      ISBN:9781605589855
      DOI:10.1145/1814433

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 June 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate274of1,679submissions,16%

      Upcoming Conference

      MOBISYS '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader