skip to main content
10.5555/1795114.1795190guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article
Free Access

On the identifiability of the post-nonlinear causal model

Published:18 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

By taking into account the nonlinear effect of the cause, the inner noise effect, and the measurement distortion effect in the observed variables, the post-nonlinear (PNL) causal model has demonstrated its excellent performance in distinguishing the cause from effect. However, its identifiability has not been properly addressed, and how to apply it in the case of more than two variables is also a problem. In this paper, we conduct a systematic investigation on its identifiability in the two-variable case. We show that this model is identifiable in most cases; by enumerating all possible situations in which the model is not identifiable, we provide sufficient conditions for its identifiability. Simulations are given to support the theoretical results. Moreover, in the case of more than two variables, we show that the whole causal structure can be found by applying the PNL causal model to each structure in the Markov equivalent class and testing if the disturbance is independent of the direct causes for each variable. In this way the exhaustive search over all possible causal structures is avoided.

References

  1. Achard, S., & Jutten, C. (2005). Identifiability of post-nonlinear mixtures. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 12, 423--426.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Braun, M. (1993). Differential equations and their applications: An introduction to applied mathematics. New York: Springer-Verlag. 4th edition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Friedman, N., & Nachman, I. (2000). Gaussian process networks. Proc. 16th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI) (pp. 211--219). Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Gretton, A., Fukumizu, K., Teo, C., Song, L., Schölkopf, B., & Smola, A. (2008). A kernel statistical test of independence. NIPS 20 (pp. 585--592). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hoyer, P., Janzing, D., Mooji, J., Peters, J., & Schöölkopf, B. (2009). Nonlinear causal discovery with additive noise models. NIPS 21. Vancouver, B.C., Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hyvärinen, A., Karhunen, J., & Oja, E. (2001). Independent component analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Lin, J. (1998). Factorizing multivariate function classes. NIPS 10 (pp. 563--569). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mooij, J., Janzing, D., & Schöölkopf, B. (2008). Distinguishing between cause and effect. URL http://www.kyb.tuebingen.mpg.de/bs/people/jorism/causality-data/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Polyanin, A., & Zaitsev, V. (2003). Handbook of exact solutions for ordinary differential equations. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press. 2nd edition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Polyanin, A., & Zaitsev, V. (2004). Handbook of nonlinear partial differential equations (supplement s.4.4). Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Shimizu, S., Hoyer, P., Hyvärinen, A., & Kerminen, A. (2006). A linear non-Gaussian acyclic model for causal discovery. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7, 2003--2030. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (2001). Causation, prediction, and search. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 2nd edition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sun, X., Janzing, D., & Schöölkopf, B. (2008). Causal reasoning by evaluating the complexity of conditional densities with kernel methods. Neurocomputing, 71, 1248--1256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Verma, T., & Pearl, J. (1990). Equivalence and synthesis of causal models. Proceedings of 6th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI) (pp. 220--227). Boston, MA: Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Zhang, K., & Hyväärinen, A. (2008). Distinguishing causes from effects using nonlinear acyclic causal models. Presented at NIPS 2008 Workshop on Causality. URL http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/ahyvarin/papers/Zhang09NIPSworkshop.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. On the identifiability of the post-nonlinear causal model

                    Recommendations

                    Comments

                    Login options

                    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                    Sign in
                    • Published in

                      cover image Guide Proceedings
                      UAI '09: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence
                      June 2009
                      667 pages
                      ISBN:9780974903958

                      Publisher

                      AUAI Press

                      Arlington, Virginia, United States

                      Publication History

                      • Published: 18 June 2009

                      Qualifiers

                      • research-article

                    PDF Format

                    View or Download as a PDF file.

                    PDF

                    eReader

                    View online with eReader.

                    eReader