Pilot gaze and glideslope control

Abstract

We examined the eye movements of pilots as they carried out simulated aircraft landings under day and night lighting conditions. Our five students and five certified pilots were instructed to quickly achieve and then maintain a constant 3-degree glideslope relative to the runway. However, both groups of pilots were found to make significant glideslope control errors, especially during simulated night approaches. We found that pilot gaze was directed most often toward the runway and to the ground region located immediately in front of the runway, compared to other visual scene features. In general, their gaze was skewed toward the near half of the runway and tended to follow the runway threshold as it moved on the screen. Contrary to expectations, pilot gaze was not consistently directed at the aircraft's simulated aimpoint (i.e., its predicted future touchdown point based on scene motion). However, pilots did tend to fly the aircraft so that this point was aligned with the runway threshold. We conclude that the supplementary out-of-cockpit visual cues available during day landing conditions facilitated glideslope control performance. The available evidence suggests that these supplementary visual cues are acquired through peripheral vision, without the need for active fixation.

References

1. Allison, R. S., Eizenman, M., and Cheung, B. S. 1996. Combined head and eye tracking system for dynamic testing of the vestibular system. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 43, 1073--1082.
2. Basler, M., Spott, M., Buchanan, S., Berndt, J., Buckel, B., Moore, C., Olson, C., Perry, D., Selig, M., et al. 2008. The FlightGear Manual. http://www.flightgear.org/Docs/getstart/getstart.html.
3. Berndt, J. 2001. JSBSim, a flight dynamics model. http://jsbsim.sourceforge.net/.
4. Calvert, E. S. 1954. Visual judgments in motion. J. Inst. Navigation. 7, 233--251.
5. Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 2nd Ed. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
6. Duchowski, A. T. 2002. A breadth-first survey of eye tracking applications. Behav. Res. Method. Instrum. Comput. 34, 455--470.
7. Flach, J. M., Hagen, B. A., and Larish, J. F. 1992. Active regulation of altitude as a function of optical texture. Percept. Psychophys. 51, 557--568.
8. Galanis, G., Jennings, A., and Beckett, P. 1998. A mathematical model of glide-slope perception in the visual approach to landing. Int. J. Aviation Psych. 8 83--101.
9. Gibb, R. W. 2007. Visual spatial disorientation: revisiting the black hole illusion. Aviation Space Environ. Med. 78, 801--808.
10. Gibson, J. J. 1950. The Perception of the Visual World. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
11. Gibson, J. J., Olum, P., and Rosenblatt, F. 1955. Parallax and perspective during aircraft landings. Am. J. Psych. 68, 372--385.
12. Grosz, J., Rysdyk, R. T. H., Bootsma, R. J., Mulder, J. A., Van Der Vaart, J. C., and Van Wieringen, P. C. W. 1995. Perceptual support for timing of the flare in the landing of an aircraft. In Local Application of the Ecological Approach to the Human-Machine Systems, P. Hancock, J. M. Flach, J. Caird, and K. Vincente, Eds. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 104--121.
13. Land, M. F. and Lee, D. N. 1994. Where we look when we steer. Nature 369, 6483, 742--744.
14. Lintern, G. and Koonce, J. M. 1991. Display magnification for simulated landing approaches. Int. J. Aviation Psych. 1, 57--70.
15. Lintern, G. and Liu, Y. T. 1991. Explicit and implicit horizons for simulated landing approaches. Hum. Factors 33, 401--417.
16. Liu, Z., Yuan, X., Liu, W., and Wang, R. 2002. Characteristics of eye movement and cognition during simulated landing of aircraft. Space Med. Med. Eng. 15, 379--380.
17. Mackworth J. F. and Mackworth, N. H. 1958. Eye fixations recorded on changing visual scenes by the television eye marker. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 48, 438.
18. Majendie, A. M. A. 1960. The para-visual director. J. Inst. Navig. 13, 447--454.
19. Mertens, H. W. 1978. Perceived orientation of a runway model in nonpilots during simulated night approaches to landing. Aviation Space Environ. Med. 49, 457--460.
20. Mertens, H. W. 1981. Perception of runway image shape and approach angle magnitude by pilots in simulated night landing approaches. Aviation Space Environ. Med. 52, 373--386.
21. Moore, S. T., Macdougall, H. G., Cohen, B., Wuyts, F., Clark, J. B., Lesceu, X., and Speyer, J-J. 2005. Head-eye coordination during simulated orbiter landings. In Proceedings of the Humans in Space Symposium.
22. Mulder, M., Pleijsant, J. M., Van Der Vaart, H., and Van Wieringen, P. 2000. The effects of pictorial detail on the timing of the landing flare: Results of a visual simulation experiment. Int. J. Aviation Psych. 10, 291--315.
23. Ottati, W. L., Hickox, J. C., and Richter, J. 1999. Eye scan patterns of experienced and novice pilots during visual flight rules (VFR) navigation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting. 66--70.
24. Palmisano, S. and Gillam, B. J. 2005. Visual perception for touchdown during simulated landing. J. Exp. Psych. Appl. 11, 19--32.
25. Perrone, J. A. 1984. Visual slant misperception and the “black hole” landing situation. Aviation Space Environ. Med. 55, 1020--1025.
26. Regan, D. and Beverley, K. I. 1982. How do we avoid confounding the direction we are looking and the direction we are moving? Science 215, 194--196.
27. Robertshaw, K. D. and Wilkie, R. M. 2008. Does gaze influence steering around a bend? J. Vision 8, 1--13.
28. Thomas, E. L. 1963. The eye movements of a pilot during aircraft landing. Aerosp. Med. 34, 424--426.
29. Van de Grind, W. A., Van Doorn, A. J., and Koenderink, J. J. 1983. Detection of coherent movement in peripherally viewed random-dot patterns. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 73, 1674--1683.
30. Warren, W. H. and Kurtz, K. J. 1992. The role of central and peripheral vision in perceiving the direction of self-motion. Percept. Psychophys. 51, 443--454.
31. Wilkie, R. M. and Wann, J. P. 2002. Driving as night falls: the contribution of retinal flow and visual direction to the control of steering. Curr. Biol. 12, 2014--2017.
32. Wilkie, R. M. and Wann, J. P. 2005. The role of visual and nonvisual information in the control of locomotion. J. Exp. Psych. Hum. Percept. Perform. 31, 901--911.
33. Wilkie, R. M. and Wann, J. P. 2006. Judgments of path, not heading, guide locomotion. J. Exp. Psych. Hum. Percept. Perform. 32, 88--96.
34. Wilkie, R. M. Wann, J. P., and Allison, R. S. 2008. Active gaze, visual look-ahead and locomotor control. J. Exp. Psych. Hum. Percept. Perform. 35, 1150--1164.

Index Terms

• Applied computing

  • Education

  • Law, social and behavioral sciences

    • Psychology

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

• Software and its engineering

  • Software organization and properties

    • Contextual software domains

      • Virtual worlds software