skip to main content
10.1145/1753326.1753640acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The prayer companion: openness and specificity, materiality and spirituality

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we describe the Prayer Companion, a device we developed as a resource for the spiritual activity of a group of cloistered nuns. The device displays a stream of information sourced from RSS news feeds and social networking sites to suggest possible topics for prayers. The nuns have engaged with the device enthusiastically over the first ten months of an ongoing deployment, and, notwithstanding some initial irritation with the balance of content, report that it plays a significant and continuing role in their prayer life. We discuss how we balanced specificity in the design with a degree of openness for interpretation to create a resource that the nuns could both understand and appropriate, describe the importance of materiality to the device's successful adoption, consider its implications as a design for older people, and reflect on the example it provides of how computation may serve spirituality.

References

  1. Coleman, R. Designing for Our Future Selves. In Preiser, W. and Ostroff, E. (eds.) Universal Design Handbook. McGraw Hill (2001) 4.1--4.25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Cooper, G and Bowers, J. Representing the user. In The Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human--Computer Interfaces, P. Thomas, Ed. Cambridge Univ. Press, 48--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Crampton-Smith, G. and Tabor, P. 1996. The role of the artist-designer. In Bringing Design To Software, T. Winograd, Ed. ACM, New York, NY, 37--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Dalsgaard, P, Designing for inquisitive use. Proc. DIS'08, 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Frayling, C. Research in Art and Design. Royal College of Art Research Papers 1, 1 (1993),1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gaver, W, Bowers, J, Kerridge, T, et al. Anatomy of a failure. Proc. CHI '09, 2213--2222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gaver, W., Beaver, J., and Benford, S., Ambiguity as a resource for design. Proc. CHI'03 233--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gaver, W., Boucher, A., Law, A., et al. Threshold devices. Proc. CHI '08. 1429--1438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hansen, M and Rubin, B. Listening Post: Giving Voice to Online Communication. Proc. ICAD'02, p. 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hassenzahl, M., The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human-Computer Interaction, 2004. 19(4): 319--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. McCarthy, J and Wright P. Technology as Experience. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Mynatt, E, Rowan, J, Craighill, S, and Jacobs, A. Digital Family portraits. Proc. CHI'01 333--340.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Park, S, Kang, S, Chung, S, and Song, J. NewsCube: delivering multiple aspects of news to mitigate media bias. Proc. CHI '09. 443--452. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Pousman, Z, Romero, M, Smith, A, and Mateas, M. Living with Tableau Machine. Proc. UbiComp '08, 370--379. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Pullen, G., Design meets Disability. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sengers, P. and Gaver, W., Staying open to interpretation. Proc. DIS'06, 99--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Vetere, F., Davis, H., Gibbs., M., Howard, S., The Magic Box: Responding to the challenge of distributed intergenerational play. IJHCS, 67,2 (2009) 165--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Wherton, J., and Monk., A. Designing Cognitive Supports for Dementia. SIGACCESS'86. 28--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Willis, Paul (2000) The Ethnographic Imagination. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Woodruff, A., Augustin, S., and Foucault, B., Sabbath Day Home Automation: "It's Like Mixing Technology and Religion." Proc. CHI'07. 527--536. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Wyche, S and Grinter, R Extraordinary computing: religion as a lens for reconsidering the home. Proc. CHI '09, 749--758. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Wyche, S, Caine, K, Davison, B, et al. Sun Dial: Exploring techno-spiritual design through a mobile islamic call to prayer application. Proc CHI'08, 3411--3416. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Wyche, S, Hayes, G, Harvel, L, and Grinter, R, Technology in Spiritual Formation. Proc. CSCW'06, 199--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Zimmerman, J., Research through Design as a Method for Interaction Design Research in HCI. Proc. CHI'06 493--503. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The prayer companion: openness and specificity, materiality and spirituality

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2010
      2690 pages
      ISBN:9781605589299
      DOI:10.1145/1753326

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 April 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader