skip to main content
10.1145/1753196.1753211acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesplopConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Continuous feedback pedagogical patterns

Published:18 October 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Successful teachers recognize there is more to teaching than mastering content. Concern for student learning is the central theme. Over time, teachers develop a repertoire of best practices, classroom skills, and methods that have proven effective for them. The teaching patterns presented here were gathered from our collective experience in the classroom and those we have observed among our colleagues. The patterns presented in this paper focus on continuous feedback. Some patterns involve direct feedback from the teacher to the student while others involve feedback from the students to the teacher. Several of the patterns can be adapted for use in classrooms ranging from kindergarten to adult learning and to seminars and workshops in the business and industrial communities.

References

  1. The Pedagogical Patterns Project. http://www.pedagogicalpatterns.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dana L. G. Anthony. Patterns for classroom education. pages 391--406, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Steve Bean. Classroom management to promote learning. http://www.etr.org/recapp/practice/edskills200109.htm, September 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Joe Bergin. Fourteen Pedagogical Patterns. http://csis.pace.edu/~bergin/PedPat1.3.html, July 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Joe Bergin, Jutta Eckstein, Mary Lynn Manns, and Helen Sharp. Feedback patterns. http://www.pedagogicalpatterns.org/, July 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Joseph Bergin. Active learning and feedback patterns: version 4. In PLoP '06: Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Pattern languages of programs, pages 1--6, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Paul R. Burden, David M. Byrd, and David M. Byrd. Methods for Effective Teaching: Promoting K-12 Student Understanding. Pearson, fourth edition, July 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jutta Eckstein, Joe Bergin, and Helen Sharp. Patterns for Active Learning. In Proceedings of PLoP 2002, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Richard D. Kellough and Noreen G. Kellough. Secondary School Teaching: A Guide to Methods and Resources. Pearson, third edition, March 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Charles N. Seashore, Edith Whitfield Seashore, and Gerald M. Weinberg. What Did You Say? Bingham House Books, Columbia, MD, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Harry G Tuttle. Teacher Expectations and Student Achievements (TESA)- Feedback. http://eduwithtechn.wordpress.com/2007/02/25/teacher-expectations-and-student-achievement-tesa-feedback/ February 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Harry G Tuttle. Teacher Expectations and Student Achievements (TESA)- Giving Student Response Opportunities. http://eduwithtechn.wordpress.com/2007/02/24/teacher-expectations-and-student-achievement-tesa-giving-s February 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Continuous feedback pedagogical patterns

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      PLoP '08: Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs
      October 2008
      295 pages
      ISBN:9781605581514
      DOI:10.1145/1753196
      • General Chair:
      • Joseph Yoder,
      • Program Chair:
      • Ademar Aguiar

      Copyright © 2008 Copyright is held by the author(s).

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 October 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate28of36submissions,78%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader