Scalable game design and the development of a checklist for getting computational thinking into public schools

ABSTRACT

Game design appears to be a promising approach to interest K-12 students in Computer Science. Unfortunately, balancing motivational and educational concerns is truly challenging. Over a number of years, we have explored how to achieve a functional balance by creating a curriculum that combines increasingly complex game designs, computational thinking patterns and authoring tools. Scalable Game Design is a research project exploring new strategies of how to scale up from after school and summer programs into required curriculum of public schools through game design approaches. The project includes inner city schools, remote rural areas and Native American communities. A requirement checklist of computational thinking tools regarding curriculum, teacher training, standards and authoring tools has been developed and is being tested with thousands of students.

References

1. A. Repenning and A. Ioannidou, "Broadening Participation through Scalable Game Design," in Proceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education Conference, (SIGCSE 2008), Portland, Oregon USA, 2008, pp. 305--309.
2. A. Repenning and A. Ioannidou, "Agent-Based End-User Development," Communications of the ACM, 47(9), pp. 43--46, 2004.
3. A. Repenning and A. Ioannidou, "AgentCubes: Raising the Ceiling of End-User Development in Education through Incremental 3D," in IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC'06), Brighton, United Kingdom, 2006, pp. 27-- 34.
4. Board of Directors, Computer Science Teachers Association, "Achieving Change: The CSTA Strategic Plan," 2005.
5. ITEST Learning Resource Center, "ITEST Project Abstracts: Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5," 2008.
6. E. Gootman, "The Critical Years: For Teachers, Middle School Is Test of Wills," New York Times, March 17, 2007.
7. S. J. Sears, "Career and Educational Planning in the Middle Level School," NASSP Bulletin, April 1995, 1995.
8. T. Oppenheimer, The Flickering Mind: The False Promise of Technology in the Classroom and How Learning Can Be Saved. Toronto, Canada: Random House, 2003.
9. J. Gindling, A. Ioannidou, J. Loh, O. Lokkebo, and A. Repenning, "LEGOsheets: A Rule-Based Programming, Simulation and Manipulation Environment for the LEGO Programmable Brick," in Proceeding of Visual Languages, Darmstadt, Germany, 1995, pp. 172--179.
10. R. S. Cohen, "Logo in the Primary Classroom: Should Simplified Versions Be Used?," The Computer Teacher, pp. 41--43, 1990.
11. M. Gladwell, The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference: Back Bay Books, 2002.
12. J. M. Wing, "Computational Thinking," Communications of the ACM, 49(3), pp. 33--35, March 2006.
13. S. Papert, "An Exploration in the Space of Mathematics Education," International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1(1), 1996.
14. G. H. Fletcher, and J. J. Lu, "Education, Human computing skills: rethinking the K-12 experience," Communications of the. ACM, 52(2), pp. 23--25, 2009.
15. President's Information Technology Advisory Committee (PITAC), "Report to the President: Computational Science: Ensuring America's Competitiveness," June 2005.
16. Committee on Information Technology Literacy, National Research Council, Being Fluent with Information Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1999.
17. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE), National Educational Technology Standards for Students (NETS), 2nd ed., 2007.
18. M. Dertouzos, "Creating the People's Computer," MIT Technology Review, Cambridge, MA, 100(3), pp. 20--28, 1997.
19. A. I. Mørch, "Three Levels of End-User Tailoring: Customization, Integration, and Extension," in Computers and Design in Context, M. Kyng and L. Mathiassen, Eds. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1997, pp. 51--76.
20. A. Repenning, "Collaborative Diffusion: Programming Antiobjects," in OOPSLA 2006, ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications, Portland, Oregon, 2006, pp. 574--585.
21. C. Lewis and A. Repenning, "Creating Educational Gamelets," in Educating Learning Technology Designers: Guiding and Inspiring Creators of Innovative Educational Tools, C. DiGiano, S. Goldman, and M. Chorost, Eds. New York: Routledge, 2008, pp. 203--229.
22. A. Repenning, "Excuse me, I need better AI!: employing collaborative diffusion to make game AI child's play," in ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on Videogames, Boston, Massachusetts, 2006, pp. 169--178.
23. K. Schneider and A. Repenning, "Deceived by Ease of Use: Using Paradigmatic Applications to Build Visual Design," in Proceedings of the 1995 Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems, Ann Arbor, MI, 1995, pp. 177--188.
24. M. Csikszentmihalyi, Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 1990.
25. S. M. Barnett and S. J. Ceci, "When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer," Psychological bulletin, 128(4), pp. 612--37, 2002.
26. S. Walter, B. Barron, K. Forssell, and C. Martin, "Continuing Motivation for Game Design," in CHI 2007, San Jose, California, USA, 2007, pp. 2735--2740.

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

      • Computing education programs

        • Computer science education