Ofer Arazy
Oded Nov
ABSTRACT
The success of Wikipedia and the relative high quality of its articles seem to contradict conventional wisdom. Recent studies have begun shedding light on the processes contributing to Wikipedia's success, highlighting the role of coordination and contribution inequality. In this study, we expand on these works in two ways. First, we make a distinction between global (Wikipedia-wide) and local (article-specific) inequality and investigate both constructs. Second, we explore both direct and indirect effects of these inequalities, exposing the intricate relationships between global inequality, local inequality, coordination, and article quality. We tested our hypotheses on a sample of a Wikipedia articles using structural equation modeling and found that global inequality exerts significant positive impact on article quality, while the effect of local inequality is indirect and is mediated by coordination
- Anthony, D., Smith, S. W., & Williamson, T. The quality of open source production: Zealots and good samaritans in the case of Wikipedia. Rationality and Society, forthcoming.Google Scholar
- Arazy O., Morgan W., and Patterson R. Wisdom of the crowds: decentralized knowledge construction in Wikipedia. Proc. of the 16th Workshop on Information Technologies & Systems (WITS'06), December 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Benkler, Y. The wealth of networks. (2006). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45, (2002), 875--893.Google Scholar
- Chesney, T. An empirical examination of Wikipedia's credibility. First Monday, 11 (2006) (11).Google Scholar
- Cummings, J. N. Work group, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50 (3), (2004), 352--364. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Denning, P., J. Horning, D. Parnas, and L. Weinstein Inside risks: Wikipedia risks. Communications of the ACM 48, 12, (2005), p.152. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dixon, P. M., J. Weiner, T. Mitchell-Olds, R. Woodley. Bootstrapping the Gini coefficient of inequality. Ecology 68, 1987, 1548--1551.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Giles, G. Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature, 438 (2005), 900--901.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Halavais A. and Lackaff D. An analysis of topical coverage of Wikipedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2008, 429--440.Google Scholar
- Keck, S., & Tushman, M. Environmental and organizational context and executive team structure. Academy of Management Journal 36, (1993), 1314--1344.Google Scholar
- Kittur, A., Kraut, R. E. Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in Wikipedia: quality through coordination. Proceedings of CSCW 2008, ACM Press (2008). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kuk G. Strategic Interaction and knowledge sharing in the KDE Developer Mailing List, Management Science, 52, 7, (2006), 1031--1042 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lih, A. Wikipedia as participatory journalism: Reliable sources? Fifth International Symposium on Online Journalism, (2004), Austin, TX.Google Scholar
- Nov, O. What motivates Wikipedians. Communications of the ACM 50, 11, (2007), 60--64. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Press, L. Unpublished Wikipedia web survey results. Personal communication. (2006).Google Scholar
- Stvilia, B., Twidale, M., Smith, L. C., Gasser, L. Information quality work organization in Wikipedia. JASIST, 59, 6, (2008), 983--1001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Viegas, F., Wattenberg, M., & Dave, K. Studying cooperation and conflict between editors with history flow visualizations. Proc. of CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004). Google ScholarDigital Library
- von Krogh, G., & von Hippel, E. The promise of research on open source software. Management Science, 52, 7, (2006), 975--983. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Welser T., Gleave E., Fisher D., and Smith M. (2007). Visualizing the signatures of social roles in online discussion groups, Journal of social Structure, 8(2).Google Scholar
- Wilkinson, D., & Huberman, B. Assessing the value of cooperation in Wikipedia. First Monday, 12, 4, (2007).Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Determinants of wikipedia quality: the roles of global and local contribution inequality
Recommendations
A breakdown of quality flaws in Wikipedia
WebQuality '12: Proceedings of the 2nd Joint WICOW/AIRWeb Workshop on Web QualityThe online encyclopedia Wikipedia is a successful example of the increasing popularity of user generated content on the Web. Despite its success, Wikipedia is often criticized for containing low-quality information, which is mainly attributed to its ...
Towards automatic quality assurance in Wikipedia
WWW '11: Proceedings of the 20th international conference companion on World wide webFeatured articles in Wikipedia stand for high information quality, and it has been found interesting to researchers to analyze whether and how they can be distinguished from "ordinary" articles. Here we point out that article discrimination falls far ...
Detection of text quality flaws as a one-class classification problem
CIKM '11: Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge managementFor Web applications that are based on user generated content the detection of text quality flaws is a key concern. Our research contributes to automatic quality flaw detection. In particular, we propose to cast the detection of text quality flaws as a ...
Comments