Notifications and awareness: a field study of alert usage and preferences

ABSTRACT

Desktop notifications are designed to provide awareness of information while a user is attending to a primary task. Unfortunately the awareness can come with the price of disruption to the focal task. We review results of a field study on the use and perceived value of email notifications in the workplace. We recorded users' interactions with software applications for two weeks and studied how notifications or their forced absence influenced users' quest for awareness of new email arrival, as well as the impact of notifications on their overall task focus. Results showed that users view notifications as a mechanism to provide passive awareness rather than a trigger to switch tasks. Turing off notifications cause some users to self interrupt more to explicitly monitor email arrival, while others appear to be able to better focus on their tasks. Users acknowledge notifications as disruptive, yet opt for them because of their perceived value in providing awareness.

References

1. Bailey, B.P. and Konstan, J.A. On the Need for Attention Aware Systems: Measuring Effects of Interruption on Task Performance, Error Rate, and Affective State. Journal of Computers in Human Behavior, 22 (4). 709--732.
2. Cutrell, E., Czerwinski, M. and Horvitz, E., Notification, Disruption and Memory: Effects of Messaging Interruptions on Memory and Performance. in Proceedings of the IFIP TC.13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, (Tokyo, Japan, 2001), 263--269.
3. Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E. and Wilhite, S., A diary study of task switching and interruptions. in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2004), 175--182.
4. Horvitz, E., Apacible, J. and Subramani, M. Balancing Awareness and Interruption: Investigation of Notification Deferral Policies. Ardissono, L., Brna, P. and Mitrovic, A. eds. User Modeling 2005, 10th International Conference, Springer, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 2005, 433--437.
5. Horvitz, E., Jacobs, A. and Hovel, D. Attention-Sensitive Alerting Conference Proceedings on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1999, 305--313.
6. Iqbal, S.T. and Bailey, B.P., Effects of Intelligent Notification Management on Users and Their Tasks. in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (Florence, Italy, 2008), 93--102.
7. Iqbal, S.T. and Horvitz, E., Disruption and Recovery of Computing Tasks: Field Study, Analysis and Directions. in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (San Jose, California, USA, 2007), 677--686.
8. Mark, G., Gonzalez, V.M. and Harris, J. No task left behind?: examining the nature of fragmented work in Proceeding of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems ACM Press, Portland, Oregon, USA 2005, 321--330
9. Pashler, H. and Johnston, J.C. Attentional Limitations in Dual Task Performance. in Pashler, H. ed., Psychology Press/Erbaum (UK) Taylor & Francis, Hove, England, UK, 1998, 155--189.
10. Wickens, C.D. Multiple Resources and Performance Prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 3 (2). 159--177.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • HCI design and evaluation methods