Nils Dahlbäck
- 1.Ahrenberg, Lars, Ame JOnsson & Nils Dahlb~ick (1990) Discourse Representation and Discourse Management for Natural Language Interfaces, Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Text Comprehension in Man and Machine, T~iby, Stockholm.Google Scholar
- 2.Clark, Herbert H. & Catherine Marshall (1981) Definite Reference and Mutual Knowledge. In Josh, Aravind, Webber, Bonnie, and Sag, Ivan (eds.) Elements of Discourse Understanding. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 3.Cohen, Philip R. (1984) The pragmatics of referring and modality of communication, Computational Linguistics, 10, pp 97-146 Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4.Dahlb~tck, Nils (1991a) Empirical Analysis of a Discourse Model for Natural Language Interfaces, Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of The Cognitive Science SocieO~, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
- 5.Dahlb~ick, Nils, (199 lb) Representations of Discourse, Cognitive and Computational Aspects, PhD-thesis, Link6ping University.Google Scholar
- 6.Dahlb~ick, Nils (1992) Pronoun usage in NLI-dialogues: A Wizard of Oz study. To appear in Papers from the Third Nordic Conference on Text Comprehension in Man and Machine, Link0ping April, 21-23, 1992.Google Scholar
- 7.Dahlbitck, Nils & Arne JOnsson (1989) Empirical Studies of Discourse Representations for Natural Language Interfaces, Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL, Manchester. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.Dahlback, Nils & Ame JOnsson (1992) An empirically based computationally tractable dialogue model, Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of The Cognitive Science Society, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
- 9.Fraser, Norman & Nigel S. Gilbert (1991) Simulating speech systems, Computer Speech and Language, 5, pp 81-99.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 10.Gal, Annie (1988) Cooperative responses in Deductive Databases. Phi) Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
- 11.Grosz, Barbara (1977) The Representation and use of Focus in Dialogue Understanding. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of California, Berkely. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.Grosz, Barbara J., Mart. ha Pollack & Candace L. Sidner (1989) Discourse, In: Posner M. I. (Ed.) Foundations of Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: The M1T Press Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13.Guindon, Raymonde (1988) A multidisciplin~ perspective on dialogue structure in user-advisor dialogues. in Guindon, Raymoned (ed.) Cognitive Science and its Applications for Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- 14.Jarke, M., Krause, J., Vassiliou, Y., Stohr, E., Turner, J. & White, N. (1985) Evaluation and assessment of domain-independent natural language query systems, IEEE quarterly bulletin on Database Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 3, Sept.Google Scholar
- 15.jOnsson, Ame (1991) A Dialogue Manager Using Initiative-Response Units and Distributed Control, Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Berlin. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16.JOnsson, Ame & Nils Dahlbltck (1988) Talking to a Computer is not Like Talking to Your Best Friend. Proceedings of The first Scandinivian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Tromso, Norway.Google Scholar
- 17.Kennedy, A., Wilkes, A., Elder, L. & Murray, W. (1988) Dialogue with machines. Cognition, 30, 73-105.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 18.Lakoff, R.T. (1973) The Logic of Politeness; or minding your p's and q's. Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, pp 292-305.Google Scholar
- 19.Pylyshyn, Zenon (1984) Computation and Cognition, Cambridge MA: The M1T PressGoogle Scholar
- 20.Reichman, Rachel (1985) Getting Computers to Talk Like You and Me, M1T Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 21.Shatz, M. & Gelman, R. The development of communication skills' Modifications in the speech of young children as a function of listener. Monographs of the Society for research in child development.38, No 152.Google Scholar
- 22.Tennant, Harry (1981) Evaluation of Natural Language Processors Ph.D. Thesis. University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Wizard of Oz studies: why and how
Recommendations
The oz of wizard: simulating the human for interaction research
HRI '09: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interactionThe Wizard of Oz experiment method has a long tradition of acceptance and use within the field of human-robot interaction. The community has traditionally downplayed the importance of interaction evaluations run with the inverse model: the human ...
Wizard of Oz studies — why and how
Current approaches to the development of natural language dialogue systems are discussed, and it is claimed that they do not sufficiently consider the unique qualities of man-machine interaction as distinct from general human discourse. It is concluded ...
Comments