Erik Brynjolfsson
- 1 Alpar, P, and Kim, M. A comparison of approacl~es to the measurement of IT value. In Proceedings of the Twenty- Second Hawaiian International Conference On System Science (Honolufu. Hawaii 1990).Google Scholar
- 2 Baily, M, and Chakrabarti, A. Electronics and white-:ollar productivity. In ln novathm and the Productivity Crisis, Brookings, Washington, I988.Google Scholar
- 3 Baily, M.N. and Gordon, R.J. The productivity slowdown, measurement issues, and the explosion of computer power. In Brooking~ Papers on Economic A ctivi~,, W.C. Brainard, and G.I., Perry. The Brookings Institution, Washington, I),C,, 1988,Google Scholar
- 4 Barua, A., Kriebel, C. and Mukhopadhyay, T. Information technob og3' and business valtm: An analytic and empirical investigation. Working Paper, University of Texas, Austin, Tex. May 199 I.Google Scholar
- 5 Berndt, E.R. and Morrison, C.J. High-tech capital, economic and labour composition in U.S. manufacturing industries: An exploratory analysis. National Bureau of Economic Research Manuscript, Apr. 24, 1991.Google Scholar
- 6 Brooke, G, l:nlbrmation technology and productivity: An economic analysis of the effects of prcvduct differentiation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1991.Google Scholar
- 7 Brynj:()lfsson, E. and Hitt, I~. Is information systems spending productive? New evidence and new results, inte> nal.ionai Ca)~erence on Information Systems (Orlando, FL, 1993).Google Scholar
- 8 Brynjolfsson, E., Malone, T., Gurbaxani, V. and Kambil, A. Does infof mation technology lead to smaller firms? Manag. Sci. To be published, Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9 Clemons, E.K. Evaluation of strategic investments in information technology. Commun. ACM .34, 1 (1991), 22- 36. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10 Cron, W.I. and Sobol, M.G. The relationship between computerization and performance: A strategy tbr maximizing the econo,nic benefits ol computerization. J. Inf. Manag. 6 (1983), 171-181.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 11 David, P.A. Computer and Dynamo. 1he Modern Productivity Paradox in a Not- Too-Distant Mirror. Center for Economic Poficy Research, Stanford, Calif. (1989).Google Scholar
- 12 Denistm, E.F. Estimates of productivity Change by Industry: An Evaluation arm an Alternative. The Brookings Institution, Washington), DC, i989.Google Scholar
- 13 Economist. Working harder, doling less. (1990), 17,Google Scholar
- 14 Franke, R.F. Technological revolution and productivity decline' Computer introduction it, the financial industry, Tech. Forecast. Soc. Change 3I (1987).Google Scholar
- 15 Hammer. M. Reengineering work: Don't automate, obliterate. Harvard Bua'. Rev. (July-Aug. 1990), 104-t 12.Google Scholar
- 16 Harris, S.E. and Katz, J.L. Predicting organizational performance using information technology, managerial control ratios. In Prorceedings of the Twenty--Second Hawaikm International Conqference ~m System Science (Honolulu, Hawaii, 1989).Google Scholar
- 17 Kaplan, R. Management accounting for advanced technological environments. Sci. 24.5 (Sept. 1989), 819- 823.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 18 Kemerer, C.F. and Sosa, G.L. Systems development risks in strategic information systems. In~o. &(tw. Tech.33, 3 (Apr. 1991), 212-213. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 19 Loveman, G.W. An assessment of the productivity impact on information technologies. MIT Management in the 1990s working paper #88-054, July, 1988.Google Scholar
- 20 Malone, T. and Rockart, J. Computers, networks and the corporation. Sci. LAm, 265, 3 (1991), 128--136.Google Scholar
- 21 Morrison, C.j. and Berndt, E.R. Assessing the productivity of infi)rmation technology" equipment iu the U.S. manufacturing industries. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper #3582, Jan. 1990.Google Scholar
- 22 Noyelle, T., Ed. Skills, Wages, and Pro. ductivity, in the Service Sector. Westview Press, Boulder, Col., 1990.Google Scholar
- 23 Osterman, P. The impact of computers on the employment of clerks and managers. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 39 (1986), 175-1186.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 24 tanko, R.R. Is office productivity stagnant? 3.IiS Q. (June 1991), 190- 203. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 25 Parsons, DJ., Gottlieb, C.C. and Denny, M. th-oductivity and computers in Canadian banking. University of Toronto, Dept .. of Economics working paper #9(112, .June, 1990.Google Scholar
- 26 Roach, S.S. America's white-collar productivity dilemma. Manuf Eng. (Aug. 1989), 104.Google Scholar
- 27 Roach, S.S. Services under siege- The restructuring imperative, liar. yard Bus, Re,,,. (Sept.-Oct. 1991), 82- 92.Google Scholar
- 28 Siegel, D. and Grilicbes, Z. Purchased service?s,, oul so|l lcing, coin puters ;rod productivity in manufacturing, National Bureau o| Economic Research WP#3678, Apr., 1991,Google Scholar
- 29 Snow, C.P. Government science and public lx)licy. Science t5i (1966), 650- 653.Google Scholar
- 30 Strassmann, P:A. The Business Value of Computers, Infot-mation Economics Press, New Canaan, Conn., 1990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 31 "T'hurow, L. Economic paradigms atut stow American productivity growth. Ea.~tern Eco. J. 13 (1987), 333-343.Google Scholar
- 32 Weill, P. Do Computers Pay Off? iCII Press, Washington, D.C., 1990.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- The productivity paradox of information technology
Recommendations
Information technology productivity: in search of a definite observation
The perceived phenomenon that huge investments in information technology (IT) over the past four decades have yielded a very small gain in productivity has been dubbed the 'IT paradox'. Researchers have tried various ways to prove or disprove the ...
Job Hopping, Information Technology Spillovers, and Productivity Growth
The movement of information technology IT workers among firms is believed to be an important mechanism by which IT-related innovations diffuse throughout the economy. We use a newly developed source of employee microdata---an online resume database---to ...
Information technology and productivity: Empirical evidence from the Chinese electronics industry
The importance of IT has been increasing in both developing and developed countries over the past three decades. However, almost all findings on IT productivity have been based on data collected in developed countries, while research on productivity in ...
Comments