skip to main content
research-article

The impact of quasi-equally spaced sensor topologies on signal reconstruction

Published:02 March 2010Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

A wireless sensor network with randomly deployed nodes can be used to provide an irregular sampling of a physical field of interest. We assume that a sink node collects the data gathered by the sensors and uses a linear filter for the reconstruction of a bandlimited scalar field defined over a d-dimensional domain. Sensors' locations are assumed to be known at the sink node, up to a certain position error. We then take the mean square error (MSE) of the reconstructed field as performance metric, and evaluate the effect of both uniform and quasi-equally spaced sensor layouts on the quality of the reconstructed field. We define a parameter that provides a measure of the regularity of the sensors deployment, and, through asymptotic analysis, we derive the MSE in the case of different sensor spatial distributions. For two of them, an approximate closed form expression is obtained. We validate our analysis through numerical results, and we show that an excellent match exists between analysis and simulation even for a small number of sensors.

References

  1. Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., and Cayirci, E. 2002. Wireless sensor networks: A survey. Comput. Netw. 38, 4, 393--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Cristescu, R. and Vetterli, M. 2005. On the optimal density for real-time data gathering of spatio-temporal processes in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN). ACM, New York, 159--164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Daley, R. 1991. Atmospheric data analysis. Cambridge Atmospheric and Space Science Series.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. de Bruijn, N. 1958. Asymptotic Methods in Analysis. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dogandži'c, A. and Zhang, B. 2005. Parametric signal estimation using sensor networks in the presence of node localization errors. In Proceedings of the 39th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers. IEEE Signal Processing Society, Los Alamitos, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dong, M., Tong, L., and Sadler, B. 2006. Impact of data retrieval pattern on homogeneous signal field reconstruction in dense sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Signal Processing 54, 11 (Nov.), 4352--4364. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Early, D. and Long, D. 2001. Image reconstruction and enhanced resolution imaging from irregular samples. IEEE Trans. Geosc. Remote Sens. 39, 2 (Feb.), 291--302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Feichtinger, H. and Gröchenig, K. 1993. Error analysis in regular and irregular sampling theory. Appl. Anal. 50, 167--189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Feichtinger, H. G., Gröchenig, K., and Strohmer, T. 1995. Efficient numerical methods in non-uniform sampling theory. Numer. Math. 69, 423--440. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ganesan, D., Ratnasamy, S., Wang, H., and Estrin, D. 2004. Coping with irregular spatio-temporal sampling in sensor networks. ACM SIGCOMM 34, 1 (Jan.), 125--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kay, S. 1993. Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: Estimation theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kobayashi, M., Boutros, J., and Caire, G. 2001. Successive interference cancellation with siso decoding and em channel estimation. IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun. 19, 8 (Aug.). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Liu, B. and Stanley, T. 1965. Error bounds for jittered sampling. IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr. 10, 4, 449--454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Liu, J., Zhang, Y., and Zhao, F. 2006. Robust distributed node localization with error management. In Proceedigs of the 7th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc'06). ACM, New York, 250--261. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Marvasti, F. 2001. Nonuniform Sampling: Theory and Practice. Kluwer Academic: Plenum.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Marziliano, P. and Vetterli, M. 2000. Reconstruction of irregularly sampled discrete-time bandlimited signals with unknown sampling locations. IEEE Trans. Signal Proc. 48, 12 (Dec.), 3462--3471. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Moore, D., Leonard, J., Rus, D., and Teller, S. 2004. Robust distributed network localization with noisy range measurements. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys). ACM, New York, 50--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Nordio, A., Chiasserini, C.-F., and Viterbo, E. 2006. Bandlimited field reconstruction for wireless sensor networks. arXiv:hep-th/0707.1954v1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Nordio, A., Chiasserini, C.-F., and Viterbo, E. 2008. Performance of linear field reconstruction techniques with noise and uncertain sensor locations. IEEE Trans. Signal Proc. 56, 8 (Aug.), 3535--3547. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Rachlin, Y., Negi, R., and Khosla, P. 2005. Sensing capacity for discrete sensor network applications. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN). ACM, New York, 126--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Rauhut, H. 2007. Random sampling of sparse trigonometric polynomials. Appl. Computat. Harmon. Anal. 22, 1, 16--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Rauth, M. and Strohmer, T. 1997. A frequency domain approach to the recovery of geophysical potentials. In Proceedings of the 1997 Workshop on Sampling Theory and Applications (Samp TA 97). 109--114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Smale, S., and Zhou, D.-X. 2004. Shannon sampling and function reconstruction from point values. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 41, 3, 279--305.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Stoica, P. and Moses, R. 2000. Introduction to Spectral Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Strohmer, T. 1993. Efficient methods for digital signal and image reconstruction from nonuniform samples. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Strohmer, T., Binder, T., and Süssner, M. 1996. How to recover smooth object boundaries in noisy medical images. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP 96). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 331--334.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sung, Y., Tong, L., and Poor, H. 2005. Sensor activation and scheduling for field detection in large sensor arrays. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN). ACM, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Taylor, C., Rahimi, A., and Bachrach, J. 2006. Simultaneous localization, calibration, and tracking in an ad hoc sensor network. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN). ACM, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Tulino, A. and Verdú, S. 2004. Random matrix theory and wireless communications. Foundations and Trends in Communications and Information Theory. Now Publishers, Inc., Massachusetts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Vuran, M., Akan, O., and Akyildiz, I. 2004. Spatio-temporal correlation: Theory and applications for wireless sensor networks. Comput. Netw. 45, 3 (June), 245--259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Weisstein, E. 2008. Euler-mascheroni constant. from MathWorld -- A Wolfram Web Resource.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhao, P., Zhao, C., and Casazza, P. 2006. Perturbation of regular sampling in shift-invariant spaces for frames. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52, 10 (Oct.), 4643--4648. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The impact of quasi-equally spaced sensor topologies on signal reconstruction

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
            ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 6, Issue 2
            February 2010
            270 pages
            ISSN:1550-4859
            EISSN:1550-4867
            DOI:10.1145/1689239
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2010 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 2 March 2010
            • Accepted: 1 April 2009
            • Revised: 1 February 2008
            • Received: 1 July 2007
            Published in tosn Volume 6, Issue 2

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader