skip to main content
10.1109/ESEM.2009.5316045guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesesemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Challenges in enterprise software integration: An industrial study using repertory grids

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 October 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

To identify and systematize software practitioners' perceptions of a problem is an important first step toward analyzing and searching for a solution to the problem. This paper reports on an industrial study, in which the repertory grid technique was used to elicit practitioners' perceptions of key challenges in the company's software integration practices. The perceptions of a total of nine practitioners from three organizational groups (Developer, QA Manager, Project Manager) were elicited and analyzed. We found that perceptions differ markedly between groups, but that on some issues, there is a consensus across all groups. Three types of challenges were identified as critical, causes, and easy to handle, namely responsibility, requirements, and knowledge. The elicited information may be used to plan process improvement for integration projects in the company, and may also be used in building a general ontology for integration challenges and their solutions.

References

  1. C. Argyris. Knowledge for Action . Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. C. Argyris and D.A. Schön. Organizational Learning II. Theory, Method, and Practice . Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. N. Baddoo and T. Hall. Practitioners roles in software process improvement: An analysis using grid technique. Software Process Improvement and Practice , 7:17-31, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. V.R. Basili, G. Caldiera, and D. Rombach. The goal question metric paradigm. In J.J. Marciniak, editor, Encyclopedia of Software Engineering , pages 528-532. Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M.T.H. Chi, N. de Leeuw, M.H. Chiu, and C. LaVancher. Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science , 18:439-477, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. W.E. Deming. Out of the Crisis . MIT Press, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. T. Dybå, B.A. Kitchenham, and M. Jørgensen. Evidencebased software engineering for practitioners. IEEE Software , 22:58-65, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. K.A. Ericsson and H.A. Simon. Protocol Analysis . The MIT Press, revised edition, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D.N. Ford and J.D. Sterman. Expert knowledge elicitation to improve formal and mental models. System Dynamics Review , 14(4):509-340, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. F. Fransella, R. Bell, and D. Bannister. A Manual for Repertory Grid Technique . John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. Gentner and A.L. Stevens, editors. Mental Models . Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. G. Gigerenzer. Gut Feelings. The Intelligence of the Unconscious . Viking, Penguin, Ltd., 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Gregor. The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly , 30(3):611-642, Sept. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. T.R. Gruber. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition , 5(2):199-220, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Gruninger and J. Lee. Ontology - applications and design. Communications of the ACM , 45(2):39-41, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. T. Gulledge. What is integration? Industrial Management & Data Systems , 106(1):5-20, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. G. Hohpe and B. Woolf. Enterprise Integration Patterns: Designing, Building, and Deploying Messaging Solutions . Addison-Wesley, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. O.R. Holsti. Content analysis. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson, editors, The Handbook of Social Psychology , volume 2. Addison-Wesley, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. P. Honey. The repertory grid in action. Industrial and Commercial Training , 11:452-459, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. F. Houdek. External experiments--a workable paradigm for collaboration between industry and academia. In N. Juristo and A.M. Moreno, editors, Lecture Notes on Empirical Software Engineering , volume 12, chapter 4, pages 133-166. World Scientific, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. T. Hurson. Think Better: An Innovator's Guide to Productive Thinking . McGraw-Hill, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. IEEE Standard Computing Dictionary--a compilation of IEEE standard computer glossaries, 610-1991, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. D. Jankowicz. The Easy Guide to Repertory Grids . John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. P. Jarvis. The Practitioner-Researcher . Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. P.N. Johnson-Laird. Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness . Cambridge University Press, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. P.N. Johnson-Laird. Mental models and thought. In K. Holyoak and R.J. Sternberg, editors, The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning , pages 185-208. Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. A.R. Kearney and S. Kaplan. Toward a methodology for the measurement of knowledge structures of ordinary people: The Conceptual Content Cognitive Map (3CM). Environment and Behavior , 29(5):579-617, Sept. 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. G.A. Kelly. The Psychology of Personal Constructs . Norton, 1955.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. G.A. Kelly. A Theory of Personality . Norton, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. B. Kitchenham, T. Dybå, and M. Jørgensen. Evidence-based software engineering. In Proc. Int'l Conf. Software Engineering (ICSE'04) . IEEE Computer Society, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. K. Krippendorff. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology . Sage, second edition, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. M. Markus and C. Tanis. The enterprise system experience--from adoption to success. In R. Zmud, editor, Framing the Domains of ITManagement: Projecting the Future through the Past , pages 173-207. Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Inc., 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. L. Mathiassen. Reflective systems development. Scandinavian J. Information Systems , 10(1&2):67-118, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. G.M. McGrath and E. More. Data integration along the healthcare supply chain: The pharmaceutical extranet gateway project. In Proc. 34th Hawaii Int'l Conf. on System Sciences . IEEE Computer Society, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. J. McKeen and H. Smith. New development in practice II: Enterprise application integration. Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 8:451-466, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. G.A. Miller. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review , 63:81-97, 1956.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. N. Niu and S. Easterbrook. So, you think you know others' goals? a repertory grid study. IEEE Software , pages 53-61, March/April 2007. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. D.A. Norman. Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner and A.L. Stevens, editors, Mental Models , chapter 1, pages 7-14. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. W.A. Shewhart. Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product. 50th Anniversary Commemorative Issue . American Society for Quality, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. W.A. Shewhart and W.E. Edwards. Statistical Method from the Viewpoint of Quality Control . Dover, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. V. Stewart and A. Stewart. Business Applications of Repertory Grid . McGraw-Hill, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. M. Themistocleous, Z. Irani, R. O'Keefe, and R. Paul. ERP problems and application integration issues: An empirical survey. In Proc. 34th Hawaii Int'l Conf. on System Sciences . IEEE Computer Society, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Challenges in enterprise software integration: An industrial study using repertory grids

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image Guide Proceedings
          ESEM '09: Proceedings of the 2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement
          October 2009
          601 pages
          ISBN:9781424448425

          Publisher

          IEEE Computer Society

          United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 15 October 2009

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate130of594submissions,22%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader