skip to main content
10.1145/1645953.1646157acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Semantic queries in databases: problems and challenges

Published:02 November 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Supporting semantic queries in relational databases is essential to many advanced applications. Recently, with the increasing use of ontology in various applications, the need for querying relational data together with its related ontology has become more urgent. In this paper, we identify and discuss the problem of querying relational data with its ontologies. Two fundamental challenges make the problem interesting. First, it is extremely difficult to express queries against graph structured ontology in the relational query language SQL, and second, in many cases where data and its related ontology are complicated, queries are usually not precise, that is, users often have only a vague notion, rather than a clear understanding and definition, of what they query for. We outline a query-by-example approach that enables us to support semantic queries in relational databases with ease. Instead of endeavoring to incorporate ontology into relational form and create new language constructs to express such queries, we ask the user to provide a small number of examples that satisfy the query she has in mind. Using these examples as seeds, the system infers the exact query automatically, and the user is therefore shielded from the complexity of interfacing with the ontology.

References

  1. A. Balter. Mastering Microsoft Office Access 2007 Development. Sams, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Belkhatir, P. Mulhem, and Y. Chiaramella. A conceptual image retrieval architecture combining keyword-based querying with transparent and penetrable query-by-example. In ACM International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval (CIVR), pages 528--539, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. G. Boccignone, A. Chianese, V. Moscato, and A. Picariello. Animate system for query by example in image databases. In EuroIMSA, pages 451--456, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. K. Choupo, L. Berti-Equille, and A. Morin. Optimizing progressive query-by-example over pre-clustered large image databases. In V. Benzaken, editor, BDA, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. ASTM E2369-05 Standard Specification for Continuity of Care Record (CCR). http://www.astm.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Das, E. I. Chong, G. Eadon, and J. Srinivasan. Supporting ontology-based semantic matching in RDBMS. In Proc. of Very Large Database (VLDB), pages 1054--1065, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Health level seven. http://www.hl7.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/otheract/icd9/abticd9.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms. http://www.ihtsdo.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. R. Krishnamurthy, S. P. Morgan, and M. M. Zloof. Query-by-example: Operations on piecewise continuous data(extended abstract). In Proc. of Very Large Database (VLDB), pages 305--308, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. L. Lim, H. Wang, and M. Wang. Semantic data management: Towards querying data with their meaning. In Int. Conf. Data Engineering (ICDE), pages 1438--1442, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. L. Lim, H. Wang, and M. Wang. Unifying data and domain knowledge using virtual views. In Proc. of Very Large Database (VLDB), pages 255--266, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. L. Ma, Z. Su, Y. Pan, L. Zhang, and T. Liu. RStar: An RDF storage and query system for enterprise resource management. In Intl' Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. National cancer institute thesaurus. http://www.nci.nih.gov/cancerinfo/terminologyresources.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. OntoBroker. http://ontobroker.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/index_ob.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. OTK tool repository: Ontoedit. http://www.ontoknowledge.org/tools/ontoedit.shtml.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. N. Rasiwasia, N. Vasconcelos, and P. J. Moreno. Query by semantic example. In ACM International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval (CIVR), pages 51--60, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. SWAD-Europe Deliverable 10.2: Mapping Semantic Web Data with RDBMSes. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/reports/scalable_rdbms_mapping_report/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. The KArlsruhe ONtology and semantic web tool suite. http://kaon.semanticweb.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. The protégé ontology editor and knowledge acquisition system. http://protege.stanford.edu/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. M. M. Zloof. Query-by-example: the invocation and definition of tables and forms. In D. S. Kerr, editor, Proc. of Very Large Database (VLDB), pages 1--24. ACM, 1975. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. M. M. Zloof. Query-by-example: A data base language. IBM Systems Journal, 16(4):324--343, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Semantic queries in databases: problems and challenges

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CIKM '09: Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management
        November 2009
        2162 pages
        ISBN:9781605585123
        DOI:10.1145/1645953

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 November 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader