Abstract
Understanding mechanisms for the evolution of barriers to gene flow within interbreeding populations continues to be a topic of great interest among evolutionary theorists. In this work, simulated evolving diploid populations illustrate how mild underdominance (heterozygote disadvantage) can be easily introduced at multiple loci in interbreeding populations through simultaneous or sequential mutational events at individual loci, by means of directional selection and simple forms of epistasis (non-linear gene-gene interactions). It is then shown how multiscale interactions (within-locus, between-locus, and between-individual) can cause interbreeding populations with multiple underdominant loci to self-organize into clusters of compatible genotypes, in some circumstances resulting in the emergence of reproductively isolated species. If external barriers to gene flow are also present, these can have a stabilizing effect on cluster boundaries and help to maintain underdominant polymorphisms, even when homozygotes have differential fitness. It is concluded that multiscale interactions can potentially help to maintain underdominant polymorphisms and may contribute to speciation events.
- C. Darwin, The Origin of Species, Avenal Books, NewYork, NY, USA, 1859.Google Scholar
- J. A. Coyne and H. A. Orr, "The evolutionary genetics of speciation," Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 353, no. 1366, pp. 287-305, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. A. Coyne and H. A. Orr, Speciation, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass, USA, 2004.Google Scholar
- U. Dieckmann, M. Doebeli, J. A. J. Metz, and D. Tautz, Adaptive Speciation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Doebeli, U. Dieckmann, J. A. J. Metz, and D. Tautz, "What we have also learned: adaptive speciation is theoretically plausible," Evolution, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 691-695, 2005.Google Scholar
- S. Gavrilets, "Perspective: models of speciation--what have we learned in 40 years?" Evolution, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 2197-2215, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Gavrilets, Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Kirkpatrick and V. Ravigné, "Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments," American Naturalist, vol. 159, supplement 3, pp. S22-S35, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. Bateson, "Heredity and variation in modern lights," in Darwin and Modern Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1909.Google Scholar
- T. Dobzhansky, Genetics and the Origin of Species, Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1937.Google Scholar
- H. J. Muller, "Isolating mechanisms, evolution, and temperature," Biology Symposium, vol. 6, pp. 71-125, 1942.Google Scholar
- U. K. Schliewen, D. Tautz, and S. Paabo, "Sympatric speciation suggested by monophyly of crater lake cichlids," Nature, vol. 368, no. 6472, pp. 629-632, 1994.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Schluter, "Experimental evidence that competition promotes divergence in adaptive radiation," Science, vol. 266, no. 5186, pp. 798-801, 1994.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. B. Knox and J. D. Palmer, "Chloroplast DNA variation and the recent radiation of the giant senecios (Asteraceae) on the tall mountains of Eastern Africa," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 22, pp. 10349-10353, 1995.Google ScholarCross Ref
- U. Dieckmann and M. Doebeli, "On the origin of species by sympatric speciation," Nature, vol. 400, no. 6742, pp. 354-357, 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Doebeli and U. Dieckmann, "Speciation along environmental gradients," Nature, vol. 421, no. 6920, pp. 259-264, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. D. Fry, "Multilocus models of sympatric speciation: Bush versus Rice versus Felsenstein," Evolution, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 1735-1746, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Higashi, G. Takimoto, and N. Yamamura, "Sympatric speciation by sexual selection," Nature, vol. 402, pp. 523-526, 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. J. Kawecki, "Sympatric speciation via habitat specialization driven by deleterious mutations," Evolution, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1751-1763, 1997.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. S. Kondrashov and M. Shpak, "On the origin of species by means of assortative mating," Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 265, no. 1412, pp. 2273-2278, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. S. Kondrashov and F. A. Kondrashov, "Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation," Nature, vol. 400, no. 6742, pp. 351-354, 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. R. Rice, "Disruptive selection on habitat preference and the evolution of reproductive isolation: a simulation study," Evolution, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1251-1260, 1984.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. R. Rice, "Speciation via habitat specialization: the evolution of reproductive isolation as a correlated character," Evolutionary Ecology, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 301-314, 1987.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Udovic, "Frequency-dependent selection, disruptive selection, and the evolution of reproductive isolation," American Naturalist, vol. 116, pp. 621-641, 1980.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. B. Fenster, "Gene flow in Chamaecrista fasciculata (Leguminosae). I. Gene dispersal," Evolution, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 398-409, 1991.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. A. Levin and H.W. Kerster, "Local gene dispersal in Phlox," Evolution, vol. 22, pp. 130-139, 1968.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. L. Marr, J. Leebens-Mack, L. Elms, and O. Pellmyr, "Pollen dispersal in Yucca filamentosa (Agavaceae): the paradox of self-pollination behavior by Tegeticula yuccasella (Prodoxidae)," American Journal of Botany, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 670-677, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. B. Park and M. G. Chung, "Indirect measurement of gene flow in Hosta capitata (Liliaceae)," Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 267-272, 1997.Google Scholar
- J. J. Robledo-Arnuncio and L. Gil, "Patterns of pollen dispersal in a small population of Pinus sylvestris L. revealed by total-exclusion paternity analysis," Heredity, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 13-22, 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. A. Endler, Geographic Variation, Speciation, and Clines, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1977.Google Scholar
- R. K. Grosberg, "Limited dispersal and proximity-dependent mating success in the clonal ascidian Botryllus schlosseri," Evolution, vol. 41, pp. 412-429, 1987.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. A. Smith and D. M. Green, "Sex, isolation and fidelity: unbiased long-distance dispersal in a terrestrial amphibian," Ecography, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 649-658, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Wright, "Isolation by distance," Genetics, vol. 28, pp. 114-138, 1943.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. J. Rohlf and G. D. Schnell, "An investigation of the isolation-by-distance model," American Naturalist, vol. 105, pp. 295-324, 1971.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. E. Turner, J. C. Stephens, and W. W. Anderson, "Homozygosity and patch structure in plant populations as a result of nearest-neighbor pollination," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 203-207, 1982.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. B. Goldstein and K. E. Holsinger, "Maintenance of polygenic variation in spatially structured populations: roles for local mating and genetic redundancy," Evolution, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 412-429, 1992.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. J. H. Payne and D. C. Krakauer, "Sexual selection, space, and speciation," Evolution, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1-9, 1997.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Sayama, L. Kaufman, and Y. Bar-Yam, "Symmetry breaking and coarsening in spatially distributed evolutionary processes including sexual reproduction and disruptive selection," Physical Review E, vol. 62, no. 5B, pp. 7065-7069, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Gavrilets, "The Maynard Smith model of sympatric speciation," Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 239, no. 2, pp. 172-182, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. S. Wilson and M. Turelli, "Stable underdominance and the evolutionary invasion of empty niches," American Naturalist, vol. 127, no. 6, pp. 835-850, 1986.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. S. Kondrashov, "Accumulation of Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities within a spatially structured population," Evolution, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 151-153, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Fel-Clair, T. Lenormand, J. Catalan, et al., "Genomic incompatibilities in the hybrid zone between house mice in Denmark: evidence from steep and non-coincident chromosomal clines for Robertsonian fusions," Genetical Research, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 123-134, 1996.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. F. Galloway and J. R. Etterson, "Population differentiation and hybrid success in Campanula americana: geography and genome size," Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 81-89, 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. C. Presgraves, L. Balagopalan, S.M. Abmayr, and H. A. Orr, "Adaptive evolution drives divergence of a hybrid inviability gene between two species of Drosophila," Nature, vol. 423, no. 6941, pp. 715-719, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. M. Waser, M. V. Price, and R. G. Shaw, "Outbreeding depression varies among cohorts of Ipomopsis aggregata planted in nature," Evolution, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 485-491, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. A. Swanson-Wagner, Y. Jia, R. DeCook, L. A. Borsuk, D. Nettleton, and P. S. Schnable, "All possible modes of gene action are observed in a global comparison of gene expression in a maize F1 hybrid and its inbred parents," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 18, pp. 6805-6810, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Nei, "Selectionism and neutralism in molecular evolution," Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2318-2342, 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. R. Proulx and P. C. Phillips, "The opportunity for canalization and the evolution of genetic networks," American Naturalist, vol. 165, no. 2, pp. 147-162, 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. H. Y. Tong, G. Lesage, G. D. Bader, et al., "Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network," Science, vol. 303, no. 5659, pp. 808-813, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Ravasz, A. L. Somera, D. A. Mongru, Z. N. Oltvai, and A.-L. Barabasi, "Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks," Science, vol. 297, no. 5586, pp. 1551-1555, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. H. Moore, "The ubiquitous nature of epistasis in determining susceptibility to common human diseases," Human Heredity, vol. 56, no. 1-3, pp. 73-82, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. A. Thornton-Wells, J. H. Moore, and J. L. Haines, "Genetics, statistics and human disease: analytical retooling for complexity," Trends in Genetics, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 640-647, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. D. Thomas and A. Kejariwal, "Coding single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with complex vs. Mendelian disease: evolutionary evidence for differences in molecular effects," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 43, pp. 15398-15403, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. E. Turner, J. C. Stephens, andW. W. Anderson, "Homozygosity and patch structure in plant populations as a result of nearest-neighbor pollination," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 203-207, 1982.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. J. Goodnight, "Quantitative trait loci and gene interaction: the quantitative genetics of metapopulations," Heredity, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 587-598, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. A. Orr, "The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities," Genetics, vol. 139, no. 4, pp. 1805-1813, 1995.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Sayama, L. Kaufman, and Y. Bar-Yam, "Spontaneous pattern formation and genetic diversity in habitats with irregular geographical features," Conservation Biology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 893-900, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. L. Payne, M. J. Eppstein, and C. J. Goodnight, "Sensitivity of self-organized speciation to long-distance dispersal," in Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Artificial Life (CI-ALife '07), pp. 1-7, 2007.Google Scholar
- E. Alba and B. Dorronsoro, "The exploration/exploitation tradeoff in dynamic cellular genetic algorithms," IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 126-142, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, "Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks," Nature, vol. 393, no. 6684, pp. 440-442, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Wolfram, "Undecidability and intractability in theoretical physics," Physical Review Letters, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 735-738, 1985.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Kerr, M. A. Riley, M. W. Feldman, and B. J. M. Bohannan, "Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock-paper-scissors," Nature, vol. 418, no. 6894, pp. 171-174, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. L. Czárán, R. F. Hoekstra, and L. Pagie, "Chemical warfare between microbes promotes biodiversity," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 786-790, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Johst, M. Doebeli, and R. Brandl, "Evolution of complex dynamics in spatially structured populations," Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 266, no. 1424, pp. 1147-1154, 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. M. J. Travis and C. Dytham, "The evolution of dispersal in a metapopulation: a spatially explicit, individual-based model," Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 265, no. 1390, pp. 17-23, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Underdominance, multiscale interactions, and self-organizing barriers to gene flow
Recommendations
Self-organizing approach for meta-genomes
We extend the self-organizing approach for annotation of a bacterial genome to analyze the raw sequencing data of the human gut metagenome without sequence assembling. The original approach divides the genomic sequence of a bacterium into non-...
Transcription factor binding site identification using the self-organizing map
Motivation: The automatic identification of over-represented motifs present in a collection of sequences continues to be a challenging problem in computational biology. In this paper, we propose a self-organizing map of position weight matrices as an ...
Comments