skip to main content
article
Free Access

Underdominance, multiscale interactions, and self-organizing barriers to gene flow

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 January 2009Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Understanding mechanisms for the evolution of barriers to gene flow within interbreeding populations continues to be a topic of great interest among evolutionary theorists. In this work, simulated evolving diploid populations illustrate how mild underdominance (heterozygote disadvantage) can be easily introduced at multiple loci in interbreeding populations through simultaneous or sequential mutational events at individual loci, by means of directional selection and simple forms of epistasis (non-linear gene-gene interactions). It is then shown how multiscale interactions (within-locus, between-locus, and between-individual) can cause interbreeding populations with multiple underdominant loci to self-organize into clusters of compatible genotypes, in some circumstances resulting in the emergence of reproductively isolated species. If external barriers to gene flow are also present, these can have a stabilizing effect on cluster boundaries and help to maintain underdominant polymorphisms, even when homozygotes have differential fitness. It is concluded that multiscale interactions can potentially help to maintain underdominant polymorphisms and may contribute to speciation events.

References

  1. C. Darwin, The Origin of Species, Avenal Books, NewYork, NY, USA, 1859.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. A. Coyne and H. A. Orr, "The evolutionary genetics of speciation," Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 353, no. 1366, pp. 287-305, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. J. A. Coyne and H. A. Orr, Speciation, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass, USA, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. U. Dieckmann, M. Doebeli, J. A. J. Metz, and D. Tautz, Adaptive Speciation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. M. Doebeli, U. Dieckmann, J. A. J. Metz, and D. Tautz, "What we have also learned: adaptive speciation is theoretically plausible," Evolution, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 691-695, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Gavrilets, "Perspective: models of speciation--what have we learned in 40 years?" Evolution, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 2197-2215, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. S. Gavrilets, Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. Kirkpatrick and V. Ravigné, "Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments," American Naturalist, vol. 159, supplement 3, pp. S22-S35, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. W. Bateson, "Heredity and variation in modern lights," in Darwin and Modern Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1909.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. T. Dobzhansky, Genetics and the Origin of Species, Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1937.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. H. J. Muller, "Isolating mechanisms, evolution, and temperature," Biology Symposium, vol. 6, pp. 71-125, 1942.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. U. K. Schliewen, D. Tautz, and S. Paabo, "Sympatric speciation suggested by monophyly of crater lake cichlids," Nature, vol. 368, no. 6472, pp. 629-632, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. D. Schluter, "Experimental evidence that competition promotes divergence in adaptive radiation," Science, vol. 266, no. 5186, pp. 798-801, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. E. B. Knox and J. D. Palmer, "Chloroplast DNA variation and the recent radiation of the giant senecios (Asteraceae) on the tall mountains of Eastern Africa," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 22, pp. 10349-10353, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. U. Dieckmann and M. Doebeli, "On the origin of species by sympatric speciation," Nature, vol. 400, no. 6742, pp. 354-357, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. Doebeli and U. Dieckmann, "Speciation along environmental gradients," Nature, vol. 421, no. 6920, pp. 259-264, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. J. D. Fry, "Multilocus models of sympatric speciation: Bush versus Rice versus Felsenstein," Evolution, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 1735-1746, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. M. Higashi, G. Takimoto, and N. Yamamura, "Sympatric speciation by sexual selection," Nature, vol. 402, pp. 523-526, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. T. J. Kawecki, "Sympatric speciation via habitat specialization driven by deleterious mutations," Evolution, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1751-1763, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. A. S. Kondrashov and M. Shpak, "On the origin of species by means of assortative mating," Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 265, no. 1412, pp. 2273-2278, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. A. S. Kondrashov and F. A. Kondrashov, "Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation," Nature, vol. 400, no. 6742, pp. 351-354, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. W. R. Rice, "Disruptive selection on habitat preference and the evolution of reproductive isolation: a simulation study," Evolution, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1251-1260, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. W. R. Rice, "Speciation via habitat specialization: the evolution of reproductive isolation as a correlated character," Evolutionary Ecology, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 301-314, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. D. Udovic, "Frequency-dependent selection, disruptive selection, and the evolution of reproductive isolation," American Naturalist, vol. 116, pp. 621-641, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. C. B. Fenster, "Gene flow in Chamaecrista fasciculata (Leguminosae). I. Gene dispersal," Evolution, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 398-409, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. D. A. Levin and H.W. Kerster, "Local gene dispersal in Phlox," Evolution, vol. 22, pp. 130-139, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. D. L. Marr, J. Leebens-Mack, L. Elms, and O. Pellmyr, "Pollen dispersal in Yucca filamentosa (Agavaceae): the paradox of self-pollination behavior by Tegeticula yuccasella (Prodoxidae)," American Journal of Botany, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 670-677, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. K. B. Park and M. G. Chung, "Indirect measurement of gene flow in Hosta capitata (Liliaceae)," Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 267-272, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. J. J. Robledo-Arnuncio and L. Gil, "Patterns of pollen dispersal in a small population of Pinus sylvestris L. revealed by total-exclusion paternity analysis," Heredity, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 13-22, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. J. A. Endler, Geographic Variation, Speciation, and Clines, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. R. K. Grosberg, "Limited dispersal and proximity-dependent mating success in the clonal ascidian Botryllus schlosseri," Evolution, vol. 41, pp. 412-429, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. M. A. Smith and D. M. Green, "Sex, isolation and fidelity: unbiased long-distance dispersal in a terrestrial amphibian," Ecography, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 649-658, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. S. Wright, "Isolation by distance," Genetics, vol. 28, pp. 114-138, 1943.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. F. J. Rohlf and G. D. Schnell, "An investigation of the isolation-by-distance model," American Naturalist, vol. 105, pp. 295-324, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. M. E. Turner, J. C. Stephens, and W. W. Anderson, "Homozygosity and patch structure in plant populations as a result of nearest-neighbor pollination," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 203-207, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. D. B. Goldstein and K. E. Holsinger, "Maintenance of polygenic variation in spatially structured populations: roles for local mating and genetic redundancy," Evolution, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 412-429, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. R. J. H. Payne and D. C. Krakauer, "Sexual selection, space, and speciation," Evolution, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1-9, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. H. Sayama, L. Kaufman, and Y. Bar-Yam, "Symmetry breaking and coarsening in spatially distributed evolutionary processes including sexual reproduction and disruptive selection," Physical Review E, vol. 62, no. 5B, pp. 7065-7069, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. S. Gavrilets, "The Maynard Smith model of sympatric speciation," Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 239, no. 2, pp. 172-182, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. D. S. Wilson and M. Turelli, "Stable underdominance and the evolutionary invasion of empty niches," American Naturalist, vol. 127, no. 6, pp. 835-850, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. A. S. Kondrashov, "Accumulation of Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities within a spatially structured population," Evolution, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 151-153, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. F. Fel-Clair, T. Lenormand, J. Catalan, et al., "Genomic incompatibilities in the hybrid zone between house mice in Denmark: evidence from steep and non-coincident chromosomal clines for Robertsonian fusions," Genetical Research, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 123-134, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. L. F. Galloway and J. R. Etterson, "Population differentiation and hybrid success in Campanula americana: geography and genome size," Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 81-89, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. D. C. Presgraves, L. Balagopalan, S.M. Abmayr, and H. A. Orr, "Adaptive evolution drives divergence of a hybrid inviability gene between two species of Drosophila," Nature, vol. 423, no. 6941, pp. 715-719, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. N. M. Waser, M. V. Price, and R. G. Shaw, "Outbreeding depression varies among cohorts of Ipomopsis aggregata planted in nature," Evolution, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 485-491, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. R. A. Swanson-Wagner, Y. Jia, R. DeCook, L. A. Borsuk, D. Nettleton, and P. S. Schnable, "All possible modes of gene action are observed in a global comparison of gene expression in a maize F1 hybrid and its inbred parents," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 18, pp. 6805-6810, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. M. Nei, "Selectionism and neutralism in molecular evolution," Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2318-2342, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. S. R. Proulx and P. C. Phillips, "The opportunity for canalization and the evolution of genetic networks," American Naturalist, vol. 165, no. 2, pp. 147-162, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. A. H. Y. Tong, G. Lesage, G. D. Bader, et al., "Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network," Science, vol. 303, no. 5659, pp. 808-813, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. E. Ravasz, A. L. Somera, D. A. Mongru, Z. N. Oltvai, and A.-L. Barabasi, "Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks," Science, vol. 297, no. 5586, pp. 1551-1555, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. J. H. Moore, "The ubiquitous nature of epistasis in determining susceptibility to common human diseases," Human Heredity, vol. 56, no. 1-3, pp. 73-82, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. T. A. Thornton-Wells, J. H. Moore, and J. L. Haines, "Genetics, statistics and human disease: analytical retooling for complexity," Trends in Genetics, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 640-647, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. P. D. Thomas and A. Kejariwal, "Coding single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with complex vs. Mendelian disease: evolutionary evidence for differences in molecular effects," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 43, pp. 15398-15403, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. M. E. Turner, J. C. Stephens, andW. W. Anderson, "Homozygosity and patch structure in plant populations as a result of nearest-neighbor pollination," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 203-207, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. C. J. Goodnight, "Quantitative trait loci and gene interaction: the quantitative genetics of metapopulations," Heredity, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 587-598, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. H. A. Orr, "The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities," Genetics, vol. 139, no. 4, pp. 1805-1813, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. H. Sayama, L. Kaufman, and Y. Bar-Yam, "Spontaneous pattern formation and genetic diversity in habitats with irregular geographical features," Conservation Biology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 893-900, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. J. L. Payne, M. J. Eppstein, and C. J. Goodnight, "Sensitivity of self-organized speciation to long-distance dispersal," in Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Artificial Life (CI-ALife '07), pp. 1-7, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. E. Alba and B. Dorronsoro, "The exploration/exploitation tradeoff in dynamic cellular genetic algorithms," IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 126-142, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, "Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks," Nature, vol. 393, no. 6684, pp. 440-442, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. S. Wolfram, "Undecidability and intractability in theoretical physics," Physical Review Letters, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 735-738, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. B. Kerr, M. A. Riley, M. W. Feldman, and B. J. M. Bohannan, "Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock-paper-scissors," Nature, vol. 418, no. 6894, pp. 171-174, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. T. L. Czárán, R. F. Hoekstra, and L. Pagie, "Chemical warfare between microbes promotes biodiversity," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 786-790, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. K. Johst, M. Doebeli, and R. Brandl, "Evolution of complex dynamics in spatially structured populations," Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 266, no. 1424, pp. 1147-1154, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. J. M. J. Travis and C. Dytham, "The evolution of dispersal in a metapopulation: a spatially explicit, individual-based model," Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 265, no. 1390, pp. 17-23, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Underdominance, multiscale interactions, and self-organizing barriers to gene flow

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              Full Access

              • Published in

                cover image Journal of Artificial Evolution and Applications
                Journal of Artificial Evolution and Applications  Volume 2009, Issue S1
                Special issue on artificial evolution methods in the biological and biomedical sciences
                January 2009
                73 pages
                ISSN:1687-6229
                EISSN:1687-6237
                Issue’s Table of Contents

                Publisher

                Hindawi Limited

                London, United Kingdom

                Publication History

                • Accepted: 1 June 2009
                • Received: 11 March 2009
                • Published: 1 January 2009

                Qualifiers

                • article
              • Article Metrics

                • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
                • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

                Other Metrics

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader