skip to main content
10.5555/1628960.1628976dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaclstudentConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Dialogue act tagging for instant messaging chat sessions

Published:27 June 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

Instant Messaging chat sessions are real-time text-based conversations which can be analyzed using dialogue-act models. We describe a statistical approach for modelling and detecting dialogue acts in Instant Messaging dialogue. This involved the collection of a small set of task-based dialogues and annotating them with a revised tag set. We then dealt with segmentation and synchronisation issues which do not arise in spoken dialogue. The model we developed combines naive Bayes and dialogue-act n-grams to obtain better than 80% accuracy in our tagging experiment.

References

  1. John L. Austin. 1962. How to do Things with Words. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jean Carletta. 1996. Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22(2):249--254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Mark Core and James Allen. 1997. Coding dialogs with the DAMSL annotation scheme. Working Notes of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Communicative Action in Humans and Machines, pages 28--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Thomas M. Cover and Joy A. Thomas. 1991. Elements of Information Theory. Wiley, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Daniel Jurafsky, Rebecca Bates, Noah Coccaro, Rachel Martin, Marie Meteer, Klaus Ries, Elizabeth Shriberg, Andreas Stolcke, Paul Taylor, and Carol Van Ess-Dykema. 1997. Automatic detection of discourse structure for speech recognition and understanding. Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Workshop on Speech Recognition and Understanding, pages 88--95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Kenji Kita, Yoshikazu Fukui, Masaaki Nagata, and Tsuyoshi Morimoto. 1996. Automatic acquisition of probabilistic dialogue models. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language, 1:196--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Lori Levin, Klaus Ries, Ann Thyme-Gobbel, and Alon Lavie. 1999. Tagging of speech acts and dialogue games in spanish call home. Towards Standards and Tools for Discourse Tagging (Proceedings of the ACL Workshop at ACL'99), pages 42--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. William Mann. 2002. Dialogue macrogame theory. Proceedings of the 3rd SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, pages 129--141. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. John R. Searle. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sidney Siegel and N. John Castellan, Jr. 1988. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, second edition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Andreas Stolcke, Noah Coccaro, Rebecca Bates, Paul Taylor, Carol Van Ess-Dykema, Klaus Ries, Elizabeth Shriberg, Daniel Jurafsky, Rachel Martin, and Marie Meteer. 2000. Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech. Computational Linguistics, 26(3):339--373. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hideki Tanaka and Akio Yokoo. 1999. An efficient statistical speech act type tagging system for speech translation systems. In Proceedings of the 37th conference on Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 381--388. Association for Computational Linguistics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image DL Hosted proceedings
    ACLstudent '05: Proceedings of the ACL Student Research Workshop
    June 2005
    169 pages

    Publisher

    Association for Computational Linguistics

    United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 June 2005

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate12of43submissions,28%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader