skip to main content
10.5555/1628960.1628969dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaclstudentConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Using emoticons to reduce dependency in machine learning techniques for sentiment classification

Published:27 June 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

Sentiment Classification seeks to identify a piece of text according to its author's general feeling toward their subject, be it positive or negative. Traditional machine learning techniques have been applied to this problem with reasonable success, but they have been shown to work well only when there is a good match between the training and test data with respect to topic. This paper demonstrates that match with respect to domain and time is also important, and presents preliminary experiments with training data labeled with emoticons, which has the potential of being independent of domain, topic and time.

References

  1. W. B. Cavnar and J. M. Trenkle. 1994. N-Gram-Based Text Categorization. In Proceedings of the Third Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval, pages 161--175, Las Vegas, Nevada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Kushal Dave, Steve Lawrence, and David M. Pennock. 2003. Mining the Peanut Gallery: Opinion Extraction and Semantic Classification of Product Reviews. In Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference, Budapest, Hungary. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Charlotta Engström. 2004. Topic Dependence in Sentiment Classification. Master's thesis, University of Cambridge, July.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. T. Joachims. 1999. Making large-Scale SVM Learning Practical. In B. Schölkopf, C. Burges, and A. Smola, editors, Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bo Pang and Lillian Lee. 2004. A Sentimental Education: Sentiment Analysis Using Subjectivity Summarization Based on Minimum Cuts. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bo Pang, Lillian Lee, and Shivakumar Vaithyanathan. 2002. Thumbs up? Sentiment Classification using Machine Learning Techniques. In Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, University of Pennsylvania. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ellen Spertus. 1997. Smokey: Automatic Recognition of Hostile Messages. In Proceedings of the Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Peter D. Turney. 2002. Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'02), pages 417--424, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image DL Hosted proceedings
    ACLstudent '05: Proceedings of the ACL Student Research Workshop
    June 2005
    169 pages

    Publisher

    Association for Computational Linguistics

    United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 June 2005

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate12of43submissions,28%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader