ABSTRACT
Personal energy consumption, specifically home energy consumption such as heating, cooling, and electricity, has been an important environmental and economic topic for decades. Despite the attention paid to this area, few researchers have specifically explored these issues within a community that makes up approximately 30% of U.S. households -- those below the federal poverty line. We present a study of 26 low-income households in two very different locations -- a small town in the Southern U.S. and a northerly metropolitan area. Through a photo-elicitation study and directed interviews, we explore the relationship between energy saving behaviors, external factors, and users' intrinsic values and beliefs. Most of our participants are committed to saving energy for non-financial reasons, even when not responsible for paying bills. Challenges to saving energy include safety and lack of control over the environment. We discuss how Ubicomp technologies for saving energy can address some of these challenges.
- Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C.,&Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. J Env Psych, 25:273--291.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ajzen, I.,&Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5):888--918.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bandura, A.(1977).Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall: NJ.Google Scholar
- Blevis, E. (2007). Sustainable interaction design: Invention&disposal, renewal&re-use. CHI'07, 503--12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carter, S.&Mankoff, J. (2005). When participants do the capturing: The role of media in diary studies. CHI'05, 899--908. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chetty, M., Tran, D.,&Grinter, R. (2008). Getting to green: Understanding resource consumption in the home. UbiComp'08, 242--251 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cooper, M.N., Sullivan, T.L., Punnet, S.,&Berman, E. (1983). Equity and energy: Rising energy prices and the living standards of lower income Americans. Westview: CO.Google Scholar
- Corcoran, M. 2001. Mobility, persistence, and the consequences of poverty for children: Child and adult outcomes. S. Danziger&R. Haveman, Eds., Understanding Poverty, Harvard University Press: MA, 127--161.Google Scholar
- Dahlstrand, U.,&Biel, A. (1997). Pro-environmental habits: Propensity levels in behavioral change. J Applied Soc. Psych. 25(5):440--462.Google Scholar
- Dillman, D.A., Rosa, E.A.,&Dillman, J.J. (1983). Life-style and home energy conservation in the U.S. J. Econ. Psych. 3:299--315.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dunlap, R.E.,&van Liere, K.D. (1978). The "New Environmental Paradigm": A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. J Env. Ed., 9:10--19.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fitzpatrick, G., Smith, G. (2009). Technology-Enabled Feedback on Domestic Energy Consumption: Articulating a Set of Design Concerns. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 8(1): 37--44. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Froehlich, J., Dillahunt, T., Klasnja, P., Mankoff, J., Consolvo, S., Harrison, B.,&Landay, J.A. (2009). UbiGreen: Investigating a mobile tool for tracking and supporting green transportation habits. CHI'09, 1043--1052. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gardner, G.&Stern, P. (2008). The short list: The most effective actions U.S. households can take to curb climate change. Viewed 04/17/2009. http://www.environment magazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/September-October%202008/~gardner-stern-full.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Gersick, C.J.G.,&Hackman, J.R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47(1):65--97.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Graybiel, A. (2000). The basal ganglia. Current Biology, 10(14):R509--511.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Grimes, A., Bednar, M., Bolter, J.D.,&Grinter, R.E. (2008). EatWell: Sharing nutrition-related memories in a low-income community. CSCW'08, 87--95. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Haines, V., Mitchell, V., Cooper, C.,&Maguire, M. (2007). Probing user values in the home environment within a technology driven Smart Home project. PUC, 11(5):349--359. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Horrigan, J. B.&Smith, A. (2007). Home broadband adoption 2007. Pew Internet and the American Life Project.Google Scholar
- Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating sustainable consumption: a review of evidence on consumer behavior and behavioral change, Sustainable Development Research Network. Policy Studies Institute, London.Google Scholar
- James, R.N.&Sharpe, D.L. (2009). The nature and causes of the U-shaped charitable giving profile. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2):218--238.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kollmuss, A.,&Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior Env Ed Res, 8:239--252.Google Scholar
- Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E.,&Roser-Renouf, C. (2008). Saving energy at home and on the road: A survey of Americans' energy saving behaviors, intentions, motivations, and barriers. Yale University and George Mason University. Yale project on Climate Change: CT. http://environment.yale.edu/uploads/~SavingEnergy.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Martin, N. (2008). Habit: the 95% of behavior marketers ignore. First edition. FT Press: NJ. Google ScholarDigital Library
- NC City Data. Viewed Online 04/17/2009. URL not provided to preserve participant anonymity.Google Scholar
- Population Finder. Viewed 04/17/2009. http://2010.census. gov/2010census/Google Scholar
- Ronis, D., Yates, J., Kirscht. J.P., (1989). Attitudes, decisions, and habits as determinants of repeated behavior. A.R. Pratkanis, S.J. Breckler,&A.G. Greenwald, Eds., Attitude structure and function, Lawrence Erlbaum: NJ, 213--239.Google Scholar
- Shui, B. (2002). Consumer lifestyles approach: A paradigm for understanding the role of consumers in energy use and environmental impacts. Ph.D. Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
- Sparks, P.,&Shepherd, R. (1992). Self-identity and the theory of planned behavior: Assessing the role of identification with "green consumerism." Social Psych. Quarterly, 55:388--399.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stern, P. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour, J Social Issues 56(3):407--424.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stern, P. (1992). What psychology knows about energy conservation. The American Psychologist, 47(10):1224--1232.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sullivan, N. (2008). Cell phones provide significant economic gains for low-income American households. A review of literature and data from two new surveys. Viewed on 4/17/2009. http://newmilleniumresearch.org/archive/Sullivan_Report_032608.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Taylor, P., Funk, C.,&Clark, A. (2006). Americans and social trust: Who, where and why. Pew Research Center. http://pewsocialtrends.org/pubs/414/americans-and-social-trust-who-where-and-whyGoogle Scholar
- Text Analysis Markup System (TAMS) Analyzer. Written by M. Weinstein. http://tamsys.sourceforge.net/Google Scholar
- Triandis, H.C. (1977). Interpersonal Behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau Newsroom (2009). Facts for features. Viewed 04/17/2009. http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/013157.htmlGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Census 2006 Economic Survey (2007). Income data. Viewed 04/17/2009 http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032007/~hhinc/new06_000.htmGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Department of Energy (2006). Annual energy review 2005. Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC DOE/EIA-0384.Google Scholar
- Van Raaij, W.F.&Verhallen, Th.M.M., (1983). A behavioral model of residential energy use. J. Econ. Psych. 3:39--63.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Weatherbase (2009). Viewed 04/17/2009: http://www.weather base.comGoogle Scholar
- Weber, C.&H.S. Matthews (2007). Quantifying the global and distributional aspects of American household carbon footprint. Ecol. Econ., 66(2-3):379--391.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Woodruff, A. Augustin, S.,&Foucault, B.E. (2007). Sabbath day home automation: It's like mixing technology and religion. CHI '07, 527--536. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Woodruff, A., Hasbrouck, J.,&Augustin, S., (2007). A bright green perspective on sustainable choices. CHI'07. 313--322. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- It's not all about "Green": energy use in low-income communities
Recommendations
Getting to green: understanding resource consumption in the home
UbiComp '08: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computingRising global energy demands, increasing costs and limited natural resources mean that householders are more conscious about managing their domestic resource consumption. Yet, the question of what tools Ubicomp researchers can create for residential ...
Conversations with my washing machine: an in-the-wild study of demand shifting with self-generated energy
UbiComp '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous ComputingDomestic microgeneration is the onsite generation of low- and zero-carbon heat and electricity by private households to meet their own needs. In this paper we explore how an everyday household routine -- that of doing laundry -- can be augmented by ...
Green IT Meaning in Energy Monitoring Practices: The Case of Danish Households
AbstractEco-conferences like COP26 in Glasgow (UK) in 2021 have brought the debate on energy consumption and climate change to the fore. Given that a third of the energy produced worldwide is consumed in the home, it is pertinent to investigate how ...
Comments