skip to main content
10.1145/1620545.1620583acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

It's not all about "Green": energy use in low-income communities

Published:30 September 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Personal energy consumption, specifically home energy consumption such as heating, cooling, and electricity, has been an important environmental and economic topic for decades. Despite the attention paid to this area, few researchers have specifically explored these issues within a community that makes up approximately 30% of U.S. households -- those below the federal poverty line. We present a study of 26 low-income households in two very different locations -- a small town in the Southern U.S. and a northerly metropolitan area. Through a photo-elicitation study and directed interviews, we explore the relationship between energy saving behaviors, external factors, and users' intrinsic values and beliefs. Most of our participants are committed to saving energy for non-financial reasons, even when not responsible for paying bills. Challenges to saving energy include safety and lack of control over the environment. We discuss how Ubicomp technologies for saving energy can address some of these challenges.

References

  1. Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C.,&Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. J Env Psych, 25:273--291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Ajzen, I.,&Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5):888--918.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bandura, A.(1977).Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall: NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Blevis, E. (2007). Sustainable interaction design: Invention&disposal, renewal&re-use. CHI'07, 503--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Carter, S.&Mankoff, J. (2005). When participants do the capturing: The role of media in diary studies. CHI'05, 899--908. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chetty, M., Tran, D.,&Grinter, R. (2008). Getting to green: Understanding resource consumption in the home. UbiComp'08, 242--251 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cooper, M.N., Sullivan, T.L., Punnet, S.,&Berman, E. (1983). Equity and energy: Rising energy prices and the living standards of lower income Americans. Westview: CO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Corcoran, M. 2001. Mobility, persistence, and the consequences of poverty for children: Child and adult outcomes. S. Danziger&R. Haveman, Eds., Understanding Poverty, Harvard University Press: MA, 127--161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dahlstrand, U.,&Biel, A. (1997). Pro-environmental habits: Propensity levels in behavioral change. J Applied Soc. Psych. 25(5):440--462.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dillman, D.A., Rosa, E.A.,&Dillman, J.J. (1983). Life-style and home energy conservation in the U.S. J. Econ. Psych. 3:299--315.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Dunlap, R.E.,&van Liere, K.D. (1978). The "New Environmental Paradigm": A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. J Env. Ed., 9:10--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Fitzpatrick, G., Smith, G. (2009). Technology-Enabled Feedback on Domestic Energy Consumption: Articulating a Set of Design Concerns. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 8(1): 37--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Froehlich, J., Dillahunt, T., Klasnja, P., Mankoff, J., Consolvo, S., Harrison, B.,&Landay, J.A. (2009). UbiGreen: Investigating a mobile tool for tracking and supporting green transportation habits. CHI'09, 1043--1052. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gardner, G.&Stern, P. (2008). The short list: The most effective actions U.S. households can take to curb climate change. Viewed 04/17/2009. http://www.environment magazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/September-October%202008/~gardner-stern-full.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gersick, C.J.G.,&Hackman, J.R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47(1):65--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Graybiel, A. (2000). The basal ganglia. Current Biology, 10(14):R509--511.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Grimes, A., Bednar, M., Bolter, J.D.,&Grinter, R.E. (2008). EatWell: Sharing nutrition-related memories in a low-income community. CSCW'08, 87--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Haines, V., Mitchell, V., Cooper, C.,&Maguire, M. (2007). Probing user values in the home environment within a technology driven Smart Home project. PUC, 11(5):349--359. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Horrigan, J. B.&Smith, A. (2007). Home broadband adoption 2007. Pew Internet and the American Life Project.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating sustainable consumption: a review of evidence on consumer behavior and behavioral change, Sustainable Development Research Network. Policy Studies Institute, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. James, R.N.&Sharpe, D.L. (2009). The nature and causes of the U-shaped charitable giving profile. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2):218--238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Kollmuss, A.,&Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior Env Ed Res, 8:239--252.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E.,&Roser-Renouf, C. (2008). Saving energy at home and on the road: A survey of Americans' energy saving behaviors, intentions, motivations, and barriers. Yale University and George Mason University. Yale project on Climate Change: CT. http://environment.yale.edu/uploads/~SavingEnergy.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin, N. (2008). Habit: the 95% of behavior marketers ignore. First edition. FT Press: NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. NC City Data. Viewed Online 04/17/2009. URL not provided to preserve participant anonymity.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Population Finder. Viewed 04/17/2009. http://2010.census. gov/2010census/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ronis, D., Yates, J., Kirscht. J.P., (1989). Attitudes, decisions, and habits as determinants of repeated behavior. A.R. Pratkanis, S.J. Breckler,&A.G. Greenwald, Eds., Attitude structure and function, Lawrence Erlbaum: NJ, 213--239.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Shui, B. (2002). Consumer lifestyles approach: A paradigm for understanding the role of consumers in energy use and environmental impacts. Ph.D. Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Sparks, P.,&Shepherd, R. (1992). Self-identity and the theory of planned behavior: Assessing the role of identification with "green consumerism." Social Psych. Quarterly, 55:388--399.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Stern, P. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour, J Social Issues 56(3):407--424.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Stern, P. (1992). What psychology knows about energy conservation. The American Psychologist, 47(10):1224--1232.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Sullivan, N. (2008). Cell phones provide significant economic gains for low-income American households. A review of literature and data from two new surveys. Viewed on 4/17/2009. http://newmilleniumresearch.org/archive/Sullivan_Report_032608.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Taylor, P., Funk, C.,&Clark, A. (2006). Americans and social trust: Who, where and why. Pew Research Center. http://pewsocialtrends.org/pubs/414/americans-and-social-trust-who-where-and-whyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Text Analysis Markup System (TAMS) Analyzer. Written by M. Weinstein. http://tamsys.sourceforge.net/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Triandis, H.C. (1977). Interpersonal Behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. U.S. Census Bureau Newsroom (2009). Facts for features. Viewed 04/17/2009. http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/013157.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. U.S. Census 2006 Economic Survey (2007). Income data. Viewed 04/17/2009 http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032007/~hhinc/new06_000.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. U.S. Department of Energy (2006). Annual energy review 2005. Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC DOE/EIA-0384.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Van Raaij, W.F.&Verhallen, Th.M.M., (1983). A behavioral model of residential energy use. J. Econ. Psych. 3:39--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Weatherbase (2009). Viewed 04/17/2009: http://www.weather base.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Weber, C.&H.S. Matthews (2007). Quantifying the global and distributional aspects of American household carbon footprint. Ecol. Econ., 66(2-3):379--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Woodruff, A. Augustin, S.,&Foucault, B.E. (2007). Sabbath day home automation: It's like mixing technology and religion. CHI '07, 527--536. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Woodruff, A., Hasbrouck, J.,&Augustin, S., (2007). A bright green perspective on sustainable choices. CHI'07. 313--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. It's not all about "Green": energy use in low-income communities

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '09: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Ubiquitous computing
      September 2009
      292 pages
      ISBN:9781605584317
      DOI:10.1145/1620545

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 September 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      UbiComp '09 Paper Acceptance Rate31of251submissions,12%Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader