ABSTRACT
We address the connectivity of large-scale ad hoc cognitive radio networks, where secondary users exploit channels temporarily and locally unused by primary users and the existence of a communication link between two secondary users depends not only on the distance between them but also on the transmitting and receiving activities of nearby primary users. We introduce the concept of connectivity region defined as the set of density pairs -- the density of the secondary users and the density of the primary transmitters -- under which the secondary network is connected. Using theories and techniques from continuum percolation, we analytically characterize the connectivity region of the secondary network by showing its three basic properties and analyzing its two critical parameters. Furthermore, we reveal the tradeoff between proximity (the number of neighbors) and the occurrence of spectrum opportunities by studying the impact of secondary users' transmission power on the connectivity region of the secondary network, and design the transmission power of the secondary users to maximize their tolerance to the primary traffic load.
- C. Bettstetter. On the minimum node degree and connectivity of a wireless multihop network. In Proc. ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc), pages 80--91. ACM Press, June 9--11 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- O. Dousse, F. Baccelli, and P. Thiran. Impact of interference on connectivity in ad hoc networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 13(2):425--436, April 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- O. Dousse, M. Franceschetti, N. Macris, R. Meester, and P. Thiran. Percolation in the signal to interference ratio graph. Journal of Applied Probability, 43(2):552--562, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Franceschetti and R. Meester. Random Networks for Communication: from Statistical Physics to Information Systems. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2007.Google Scholar
- G. R. Grimmett. Percolation (2nd Edition). Springer, 1999.Google Scholar
- P. Gupta and P. R. Kumar. Critical power for asymptotic connectivity in wireless networks. Stochastic Analysis, Control, Optimization and Applications: A Volume in Honor of W. H. Fleming. Edited by W. M.McEneany, G. Yin, and Q. Zhang, pages 547--566, 1998.Google Scholar
- G. Han and A. M. Makowski. A very strong zero-one law for connectivity in one-dimensional geometric random graphs. IEEE Communication Letters, 11(1):55--57, January 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. F. C. Kingman. Poisson Processes. Oxford University Press, New York, 1993.Google Scholar
- Z. N. Kong and E. M. Yeh. Connectivity, percolation, and information dissemination in large-scale wireless networks with dynamic links. submitted to IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Feburary 2009.Google Scholar
- O. L´evÆeque and I. E. Telatar. Information-theoretic upper bounds on the capacity of large extended ad hoc wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 51(3):858--865, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Meester and R. Roy. Continuum Percolation. Cambridge Univerisity Press, New York, 1996.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Ni and S. A. G. Chandler. Connectivity properties of a random radio network. IEEE Proc. Communication, 141(4):289--296, August 1994.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. K. Philips, S. S. Panwar, and A. N. Tantawi. Connectivity properties of a packet radio network model. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 35(5):1044--1047, September 1989.Google ScholarDigital Library
- V. Ramasubramanian, R. Chandra, and D. Mosse. Providing a bidirectional abstraction for unidirectional adhoc networks. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, pages (III)1258--(III)1267, June 23--27 2002.Google Scholar
- W. Ren, Q. Zhao, and A. Swami. Connectivity of heterogeneous wireless networks. http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.1684.Google Scholar
- W. Ren, Q. Zhao, and A. Swami. Power control in cognitive radio networks: How to cross a multi-lane highway. to appear in IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (JSAC): Special Issue on Stochastic Geometry and Random Graphs for Wireless Networks, September 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Q. Zhao. Spectrum opportunity and interference constraint in opportunistic spectrum access. In Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages (III)605--(III)608, April 15--20 2007.Google Scholar
- Q. Zhao and B. M. Sadler. A survey of dynamic spectrum access. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 24(3):79--89, May 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Connectivity of cognitive radio networks: proximity vs. opportunity
Recommendations
A software-defined radio based cognitive radio demonstration over FM band
Recent Advances in Wireless Communications and NetworksIn this paper, we present a software-defined radio (SDR) based cognitive radio (CR) implementation and demonstration over the frequency modulation (FM) band. Using GNU Radio as the software platform and USRP (Universal Software Radio Peripheral) SDR ...
Spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks: the cooperation-processing tradeoff
Cognitive Radio, Software Defined Radio And Adaptive Wireless SystemsOpportunistic unlicensed access to the (temporarily) unused frequency bands across the licensed radio spectrum is currently being investigated as a means to mitigate the spectrum scarcity. Such opportunistic access calls for the implementation of ...
Dual band connectivity of cognitive radio networks
CogART '11: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Cognitive Radio and Advanced Spectrum ManagementDual band capable cognitive radio networks (CRNs) have the advantage of being able to fall back to the secondary frequency band when the primary user (PU) is active. We analyze the connectivity of dual band capable CRNs and show the effect of primary ...
Comments