skip to main content
10.5555/1610075.1610091dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesemnlpConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Automatic classification of citation function

Published:22 July 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Citation function is defined as the author's reason for citing a given paper (e.g. acknowledgement of the use of the cited method). The automatic recognition of the rhetorical function of citations in scientific text has many applications, from improvement of impact factor calculations to text summarisation and more informative citation indexers. We show that our annotation scheme for citation function is reliable, and present a supervised machine learning framework to automatically classify citation function, using both shallow and linguistically-inspired features. We find, amongst other things, a strong relationship between citation function and sentiment classification.

References

  1. Rashid M. Abdalla and Simone Teufel. 2006. A bootstrapping approach to unsupervised detection of cue phrase variants. In Proc. of ACL/COLING-06. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Susan Bonzi. 1982. Characteristics of a literature as predictors of relatedness between cited and citing works. JASIS, 33(4):208--216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Christine L. Borgman, editor. 1990. Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics. Sage Publications, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jean Carletta. 1996. Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22(2):249--254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Daryl E. Chubin and S. D. Moitra. 1975. Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5(4):423--441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Eugene Garfield. 1979. Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology and Humanities. J. Wiley, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. C. Lee Giles, Kurt D. Bollacker, and Steve Lawrence. 1998. Citeseer: An automatic citation indexing system. In Proc. of the Third ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, pages 89--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. T. L. Hodges. 1972. Citation Indexing: Its Potential for Bibliographical Control. Ph.D. thesis, University of California at Berkeley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. David D. Lewis. 1991. Evaluating text categorisation. In Speech and Natural Language: Proceedings of the ARPA Workshop of Human Language Technology. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Terttu Luukkonen. 1992. Is scientists' publishing behaviour reward-seeking? Scientometrics, 24:297--319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Michael H. MacRoberts and Barbara R. MacRoberts. 1984. The negational reference: Or the art of dissembling. Social Studies of Science, 14:91--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Michael J. Moravcsik and Poovanalingan Murugesan. 1975. Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5:88--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Greg Myers. 1992. In this paper we report…---speech acts and scientific facts. Journal of Pragmatics, 17(4).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. John O'Connor. 1982. Citing statements: Computer recognition and use to improve retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 18(3):125--131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Chris D. Paice. 1981. The automatic generation of literary abstracts: an approach based on the identification of self-indicating phrases. In R. Oddy, S. Robertson, C. van Rijsbergen, and P. W. Williams, editors, Information Retrieval Research. Butterworth, London, UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Bo Pang, Lillian Lee, and Shivakumar Vaithyanathan. 2002. Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In Proc. of EMNLP-02. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Anna Ritchie, Simone Teufel, and Stephen Robertson. 2006a. Creating a test collection for citation-based IR experiments. In Proc. of HLT/NAACL 2006, New York, US. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Anna Ritchie, Simone Teufel, and Stephen Robertson. 2006b. How to find better index terms through citations. In Proc. of ACL/COLING workshop "Can Computational Linguistics improve IR". Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Simon Buckingham Shum. 1998. Evolving the web for scientific knowledge: First steps towards an "HCI knowledge web". Interfaces, British HCI Group Magazine, 39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Henry Small. 1982. Citation context analysis. In P. Dervin and M. J. Voigt, editors, Progress in Communication Sciences 3, pages 287--310. Ablex, Norwood, N.J.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ina Spiegel-Rüsing. 1977. Bibliometric and content analysis. Social Studies of Science, 7:97--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. John Swales. 1986. Citation analysis and discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics, 7(1):39--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. John Swales, 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Chapter 7: Research articles in English, pages 110--176. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Simone Teufel and Marc Moens. 2002. Summarising scientific articles --- experiments with relevance and rhetorical status. Computational Linguistics, 28(4):409--446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Simone Teufel, Advaith Siddharthan, and Dan Tidhar. 2006. An annotation scheme for citation function. In Proc. of SIGDial-06. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Simone Teufel. 1999. Argumentative Zoning: Information Extraction from Scientific Text. Ph.D. thesis, School of Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Peter D. Turney. 2002. Thumbs up or thumbs down? semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Proc. of ACL-02. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Melvin Weinstock. 1971. Citation indexes. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, volume 5. Dekker, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Howard D. White. 2004. Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited. Applied Linguistics, 25(1):89--116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Ian H. Witten and Eibe Frank. 2005. Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Yiming Yang and Xin Liu. 1999. A re-examination of text categorization methods. In Proc. of SIGIR-99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. John M. Ziman. 1968. Public Knowledge: An Essay Concerning the Social Dimensions of Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Automatic classification of citation function

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image DL Hosted proceedings
        EMNLP '06: Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
        July 2006
        648 pages
        ISBN:1932432736

        Publisher

        Association for Computational Linguistics

        United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 July 2006

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        EMNLP '06 Paper Acceptance Rate73of234submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate73of234submissions,31%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader