skip to main content
10.5555/1609843.1609854dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesedappsnlpConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

User input and interactions on Microsoft Research ESL Assistant

Published:05 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

ESL Assistant is a prototype web-based writing-assistance tool that is being developed for English Language Learners. The system focuses on types of errors that are typically made by non-native writers of American English. A freely-available prototype was deployed in June 2008. User data from this system are manually evaluated to identify writing domain and measure system accuracy. Combining the user log data with the evaluated rewrite suggestions enables us to determine how effectively English language learners are using the system, across rule types and across writing domains. We find that repeat users typically make informed choices and can distinguish correct suggestions from incorrect.

References

  1. Francis Bond, Kentaro Ogura, and Satoru Ikehara. 1994. Countability and number in Japanese to English machine translation. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 32--38). Kyoto, Japan. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Martin Chodorow, Michael Gamon, and Joel Tetreault. Under review. The utility of grammatical error detection systems for English language learners: Feedback and Assessment.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Martin Chodorow, Joel Tetreault, and Na-Rae Han. 2007. Detection of grammatical errors involving prepositions. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACL-SIGSEM Workshop on Prepositions (pp. 25--30). Prague, Czech Republic. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Rachele De Felice and Stephen G. Pulman. 2007. Automatically acquiring models of preposition use. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACL-SIGSEM Workshop on Prepositions (pp. 45--50). Prague, Czech Republic. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jens Eeg-Olofsson and Ola Knutsson. 2003. Automatic grammar checking for second language learners -- the use of prepositions. Proceedings of NoDaLiDa 2003. Reykjavik, Iceland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Michael Gamon, Jianfeng Gao, Chris Brockett, Alexandre Klementiev, William B. Dolan, Dmitriy Belenko, and Lucy Vanderwende. 2008. Using contextual speller techniques and language modeling for ESL error correction. In Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (pp. 449--455). Hyderabad, India.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Michael Gamon, Claudia Leacock, Chris Brockett, William B. Dolan, Jianfeng Gao, Dmitriy Belenko, and Alexandre Klementiev. 2009. Using statistical techniques and web search to correct ESL errors. To appear in CALICO Journal, Special Issue on Automatic Analysis of Learner Language.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Shicun Gui and Huizhong Yan. 2001. Computer analysis of Chinese learner English. Presentation at Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.http://lc.ust.hk/~centre/conf2001/keynote/subsect4/yang.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Shicun Gui and Huizhong Yang. (Eds.). 2003. Zhongguo Xuexizhe Yingyu Yuliaohu. (Chinese Learner English Corpus). Shanghai Waiyu Jiaoyu Chubanshe. (In Chinese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Na-Rae Han, Martin Chodorow, and Claudia Leacock 2004). Detecting errors in English article usage with a maximum entropy classifier trained on a large, diverse corpus. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Lisbon, Portugal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Na-Rae Han, Martin Chodorow, and Claudia Leacock 2006. Detecting errors in English article usage by non-native speakers. Natural Language Engineering, 12(2), 115--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Julia E. Heine. 1998. Definiteness predictions for Japanese noun phrases. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 519--525). Montreal, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Emi Izumi, Kiyotaka Uchimoto, Toyomi Saiga, Thepchai Supnithi, and Hitoshi Isahara. 2003. Automatic error detection in the Japanese learners' English spoken data. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 145--148). Sapporo, Japan. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kevin Knight and Ishwar Chander,. 1994. Automatic postediting of documents. In Proceedings of the 12th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 779--784). Seattle: WA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. John Lee. 2004. Automatic article restoration. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 31--36). Boston, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. John Lee and Stephanie Seneff. 2008. Correcting misuse of verb forms. In Proceedings of ACl-08/HLT (pp. 174--182). Columbus, OH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Guido Minnen, Francis Bond, and Anne Copestake. 2000. Memory-based learning for article generation. In Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning and of the Second Learning Language in Logic Workshop (pp. 43--48). Lisbon, Portugal. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Masaki Murata and Makoto Nagao. 1993. Determination of referential property and number of nouns in Japanese sentences for machine translation into English. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation (pp. 218--225). Kyoto, Japan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ryo Nagata, Takahiro Wakana, Fumito Masui, Atsui Kawai, and Naoki Isu. 2005. Detecting article errors based on the mass count distinction. In R. Dale, W. Kam-Fie, J. Su and O. Y. Kwong (Eds.) Natural Language Processing - IJCNLP 2005, Second International Joint Conference Proceedings (pp. 815--826). New York: Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ryo Nagata, Atsuo Kawai, Koichiro Morihiro, and Naoki Isu. 2006. A feedback-augmented method for detecting errors in the writing of learners of English. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 241--248). Sydney, Australia. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Joel Tetreault and Martin Chodorow. 2008a. The ups and downs of preposition error detection in ESL. COLING. Manchester, UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Joel Tetreault and Martin Chodorow. 2008b. Native judgments of non-native usage: Experiments in preposition error detection. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Human Judgments in Computational Linguistics, 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp 43--48). Manchester, UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Jenine Turner and Eugene Charniak. 2007. Language modeling for determiner selection. In Human Language Technologies 2007: The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics; Companion Volume, Short Papers (pp. 177--180). Rochester, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. User input and interactions on Microsoft Research ESL Assistant

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image DL Hosted proceedings
      EdAppsNLP '09: Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications
      June 2009
      100 pages
      ISBN:9781932432374

      Publisher

      Association for Computational Linguistics

      United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 June 2009

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      EdAppsNLP '09 Paper Acceptance Rate12of25submissions,48%Overall Acceptance Rate12of25submissions,48%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader