Massimo Poesio
ABSTRACT
The GNOME corpus was created to study the discourse and semantic properties of discourse entities that affect their realization and interpretation, and particularly salience. We discuss what information was annotated and the methods we followed.
- C. F. Baker, C. J. Fillmore, and J. B Lowe. 1998. The Berkeley FrameNet project. In Proc. 36th ACL. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- S. E. Brennan, M. W. Friedman, and C. J. Pollard. 1987. A centering approach to pronouns. In Proc. of the 25th ACL. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Carletta. 1996. Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the kappa statistic. Comp. Linguistics, 22(2):249--254. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. N. Carlson and F. J. Pelletier, editors. 1995. The Generic Book. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- G. N. Carlson. 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
- H. Cheng, M. Poesio, R. Henschel, and C. Mellish. 2001. Corpus-based NP modifier generation. In Proc. of the Second NAACL, Pittsburgh. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Cheng. 2001. Modelling Aggregation Motivated Interactions in Descr. Text Generation. Ph.D. thesis, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
- P. C. Gordon, R. Hendrick, K. Ledoux, and C. L. Yang. 1999. Processing of reference and the structure of language: an analysis of complex noun phrases. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(4):353--379.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. J. Grosz, A. K. Joshi, and S. Weinstein. 1995. Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2):202--225. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. K. Gundel, N. Hedberg, and R. Zacharski. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69(2):274--307.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. A. Hawkins. 1978. Definiteness and Indefinteness. Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
- I. Heim. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
- R. Henschel, H. Cheng, and M. Poesio. 2000. Pronominalization revisited. In Proc. of 18th COLING. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Hirschman. 1998. MUC-7 coreference task definition, version 3.0. In N. Chinchor, editor, In Proc. of the 7th Message Understanding Conference.Google Scholar
- M. Kameyama. 1998. Intra-sentential centering. In M. A. Walker, A. K. Joshi, and E. F. Prince, editors, Centering Theory in Discourse, chapter 6, pages 89--112. Oxford.Google Scholar
- H. Kamp and U. Reyle. 1993. From Discourse to Logic. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
- N. Karamanis. 2003. Entity coherence for descriptive text structuring. Ph.D. thesis, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
- P. Kingsbury and M. Palmer. 2002. From Treebank to Prop Bank. In Proc. ofLREC.Google Scholar
- G. Link. 1983. The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice- theoretical approach. In R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow, editors, Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, pages 302--323. Walter de Gruyter.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Loebner. 1987. Defnites. Journal of Semantics, 4:279--326.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Lyons. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
- D. Marcu. 1999. Instructions for manually annotating the discourse structures of texts. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
- E. Miltsakaki. 2002. Towards an aposynthesis of topic continuity and intrasentential anaphora. Computational Linguistics, 28(3):319--355. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Oberlander, M. O'Donnell, A. Knott, and C. Mellish. 1998. Conversation in the museum. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 4:11--32.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. J. Passonneau. 1997. Instructions for applying discourse reference annotation for multiple applications (DRAMA). Unpublished manuscript., December.Google Scholar
- J. Pearson, R. Stevenson, and M. Poesio. 2000. Pronoun resolution in complex sentences. In Proc. of AMLAP, Leiden.Google Scholar
- J. Pearson, R. Stevenson, and M Poesio. 2001. The effects of animacy, thematic role, and surface position on the focusing of entities in discourse. In M. Poesio, editor, Proc. of SEMPRO-2001. University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
- M. Poesio and M. Alexandrov-Kabadjov. 2004. A general-purpose, off the shelf anaphoric resolver. In Proc. of LREC.Google Scholar
- M. Poesio and B. Di Eugenio. 2001. Discourse structure and anaphoric accessibility. In Ivana Kruijff-Korbayová and Mark Steedman, editors, Proc. of the ESSLLI 2001 Workshop on Inf. Structure, Disc. Structure and Disc. Semantics.Google Scholar
- M. Poesio and N. Nissim. 2001. Salience and possessive NPs: the effect of animacy and pronominalization. In Proc. of AMLAP (Poster Session).Google Scholar
- M. Poesio and N. Nygren-Modjeska. To appear. Focus, activation, and this-noun phrases. In A. Branco, R. McEnery, and R. Mitkov, editors, Anaphora Processing. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
- M. Poesio and R. Vieira. 1998. A corpus-based investigation of definite description use. Computational Linguistics, 24(2): 183--216, June. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Poesio, F. Bruneseaux, and L. Romary. 1999. The MATE meta-scheme for coreference in dialogues in multiple languages. In M. Walker, editor, Proc. of the ACL Workshop on Standards and Tools for Discourse Tagging, pages 65--74.Google Scholar
- M. Poesio, R. Mehta, A. Maroudas, and J. Hitzeman. 2004a. Learning to solve bridging references. In Proc. of the ACL. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Poesio, R. Stevenson, B. Di Eugenio, and J. M. Hitzeman. 2004b. Centering: A parametric theory and its instantiations. Computational Linguistics, 30(3). Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Poesio. 2000a. Annotating a corpus to develop and evaluate discourse entity realization algorithms. In Proc. of the 2nd LREC, pages 211--218, Athens, May.Google Scholar
- M. Poesio, 2000b. The GNOME Annotation Manual, Fourth Edition. Available from http://www.hcrc.ed.ac.uk/~gnome.Google Scholar
- M. Poesio. 2003. Associative descriptions and salience. In Proc. of the EACL Workshop on Computational Treatments of Anaphora, Budapest.Google Scholar
- M. Poesio. 2004a. An empirical investigation of definiteness. In S. Kepser, editor, proc. of the International Conference on Linguistic Evidence, Tübingen, January.Google Scholar
- M. Poesio. 2004b. The MATE/GNOME scheme for anaphoric annotation, revisited. In Proc. of SIGDIAL, Boston, May.Google Scholar
- P. H. Portner. 1992. Situation Theory and the Semantics of Propositional Expressions. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
- M. Prat-Sala and H. Branigan. 2000. Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(168--182).Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Quirk and S. Greenbaum. 1973. A University Grammar of English. Longman.Google Scholar
- D. Scott, R. Power, and R. Evans. 1998. Generation as a solution to its own problem. In Proc. of the 9th INLG.Google Scholar
- G. L. Sidner. 1979. Towards a computational theory of definite anaphora comprehension in English discourse. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
- R. J. Stevenson, R. A. Crawley, and D. Kleinman. 1994. Thematic roles, focus, and the representation of events. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9:519--548.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Strube and U. Hahn. 1999. Functional centering--grounding referential coherence in information structure. Computational Linguistics 25(3):309--344. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. van Deemter and R. Kibble. 2000. On coreferring: Coreference in MUC and related annotation schemes. Computational Linguistics, 26(4):629--637. Squib. Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. A. Walker and E. Prince. 1996. A bilateral approach to givenness. In J. Gundel and T. Fretheim, editors, Reference Accessibility, pages 291--306. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
- B. L. Webber. 1979. A Formal Approach to Discourse Anaphora. Garland, New York.Google Scholar
- Discourse annotation and semantic annotation in the GNOME corpus
Recommendations
Discourse annotation in the Monroe corpus
DiscAnnotation '04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACL Workshop on Discourse AnnotationWe describe a method for annotating spoken dialog corpora using both automatic and manual annotation. Our semi-automated method for corpus development results in a corpus combining rich semantics, discourse information and reference annotation, and ...
Exploiting semantic information for manual anaphoric annotation in Cast3LB corpus
DiscAnnotation '04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACL Workshop on Discourse AnnotationThis paper presents the discourse annotation followed in Cast3LB, a Spanish corpus annotated with several information sources (morphological, syntactic, semantic and coreferential) at syntactic, semantic and discourse level. 3LB annotation scheme has ...
Incorporating GENETAG-style annotation to GENIA corpus
BioNLP '09: Proceedings of the Workshop on Current Trends in Biomedical Natural Language ProcessingProteins and genes are the most important entities in molecular biology, and their automated recognition in text is the most widely studied task in biomedical information extraction (IE). Several corpora containing annotation for these entities have ...
Comments