skip to main content
10.5555/1600053.1600099dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsclConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Main functionalities of the knowledge practices environment (KPE) affording knowledge creation practices in education

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

The present paper examines how to develop technology-mediated educational practices from acquisition and participation type approaches towards more sustained, collaborative knowledge creation, where students' work is organized around developing shared epistemic objects (artefacts, processes, practices). Typical forms of technology-mediated collaborative practices in education are illustrated through a framework of 'stairs of collaboration' related to three metaphors of learning: knowledge acquisition, participation and knowledge creation. It is maintained that typical functionalities in existing educational web-technologies, such as various Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs), are quite inflexible and inadequate for shared work on epistemic objects. The main focus in the present paper is on describing how a basic platform supporting collaborative knowledge creation, called Knowledge Practices Environment (KPE), has been built to provide affordances to work around epistemic objects and practices.

References

  1. Andriessen, J. (2006). Arguing to Learn. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp.443-459). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dysthe, O. (2002). The Learning Potential of a Web-mediated Discussion in a University Course. Studies in Higher Education, 27(3), 339-352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Enyedy, N., & Hoadley, C. M. (2006). From dialogue to monologue and back: Middle spaces in computer-mediated learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 1(4), 413-439.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Furnadziev, I., Tchoumatchenko, V., Vasileva, T., Lakkala, M., & Bauters, M. (in press). Tool for synchronous communications in collaborative knowledge practices environment (KPE). Proceedings of the V International Conference of Multimedia and Information and Communication Technologies in Education (m-ICTE 2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Furnadziev, I., Tchoumatchenko, V., Vasileva, T., & Lakkala, M. (in press). Tools for Document Centred Collaboration in Shared Space. Journal of Elektronika and Elektrotehnika.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hakkarainen, K. (2008) Features of trialogical learning: An introduction of research and development of Knowledge-Practices Laboratory (KP-Lab). Internal working paper for the KP-Lab project.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S. & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Communities of networked expertise: Professional and educational perspectives. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ilomäki, L., Lakkala, M. & Paavola, S. (2006). Case studies of learning objects used in school settings. Learning, Media, and Technology, 31 (3), 249-267.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Jalonen, S., & Kosonen, K., & Lakkala, M. (in press). Analyzing technology-enhanced knowledge practices in an engineering course. Proceedings of the CSCL 2009 conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Knorr Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual Practice. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (pp. 175-188). London and NY: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology and classroom practices: An international study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1-14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Lehto, T., & Terva, J. (2001). Verkot ja yhteisööllisyyden kehittyminen: merkitys aikuiskoulutukselle. In P. Sallila & P. Kalli (Eds.), Verkot ja teknologia aikuisopiskelun tukena (pp. 98-116). Jyvääskylä: Gummerus Kirjapaino Oy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Leinonen, T., Kligyte, G., Toikkanen, T., Pietarila, J., & Dean, P. (2003). Learning with collaborative software - A guide to FLE3. Helsinki: University of Art and Design. Retrieved from http://fle3.uiah.fi/papers/fle3_guide.pdf (March 8, 2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Markkanen, H., Holi, M., Benmergui, L., Bauters, M., & Richter, C. (2008). The Knowledge Practices Environment: a Virtual Environment for Collaborative Knowledge Creation and Work around Shared Artefacts. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2008 (pp. 5035-5040). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Muukkonen, H., Hakkarainen, K., & Lakkala, M. (1999). Collaborative technology for facilitating progressive inquiry: Future Learning Environment Tools. In C. Hoadley, & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Designing new media for a new millennium: Collaborative technology for learning, education, and training (pp. 406-415). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Muukkonen, H., Lakkala, M., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). Technology-mediation and tutoring: how do they shape progressive inquiry discourse? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(4), 527-565.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. New Collaborative Working Environments 2020 (2008). Report on industry-led FP7 consultations and 3rd Report of the Experts Group on Collaboration@Work. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/atwork/hot_news/publications/documents/new_collab _environments_2020.pdf (March 8, 2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor - An emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14, 535-557.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (in press). From meaning making to joint construction of knowledge practices and artefacts - A trialogical approach to CSCL. Proceedings of the CSCL 2009 conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Rabardel, P., & Bourmaud, G. (2003). From computer to instrument system: a developmental perspective. Interacting with Computers, 15(5), 665-691.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In Encyclopedia of Education, Second edition (pp. 1370-1373), New York: Macmillan Reference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265-283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Schrire, S. (2004). Interaction and cognition in asynchronous computer conferencing. Instructional Science, 32, 475-502.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27, 4-13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Main functionalities of the knowledge practices environment (KPE) affording knowledge creation practices in education

                        Recommendations

                        Comments

                        Login options

                        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                        Sign in
                        • Published in

                          cover image DL Hosted proceedings
                          CSCL'09: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Computer supported collaborative learning - Volume 1
                          June 2009
                          664 pages

                          Publisher

                          International Society of the Learning Sciences

                          Publication History

                          • Published: 8 June 2009

                          Qualifiers

                          • Article

                          Acceptance Rates

                          Overall Acceptance Rate182of334submissions,54%

                        PDF Format

                        View or Download as a PDF file.

                        PDF

                        eReader

                        View online with eReader.

                        eReader