skip to main content
10.5555/1599081.1599141dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescolingConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Reading the markets: forecasting public opinion of political candidates by news analysis

Published:18 August 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Media reporting shapes public opinion which can in turn influence events, particularly in political elections, in which candidates both respond to and shape public perception of their campaigns. We use computational linguistics to automatically predict the impact of news on public perception of political candidates. Our system uses daily newspaper articles to predict shifts in public opinion as reflected in prediction markets. We discuss various types of features designed for this problem. The news system improves market prediction over baseline market systems.

References

  1. Debnath, S., D. M. Pennock, C. L. Giles, and S. Lawrence. 2003. Information incorporation in online in-game sports betting markets. In Electronic Commerce. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Devitt, Ann and Khurshid Ahmad. 2007. Sentiment polarity identification in financial news: A cohesion-based approach. In Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Forsythe, R., T. A. Rietz, and T. W. Ross. 1999. Wishes, expectations, and actions: A survey on price formation in election stock markets. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 39:83--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Gidófalvi, G. 2001. Using news articles to predict stock price movements. Technical report, Univ. of California San Diego, San Diego.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hurst, Matthew and Kamal Nigam. 2004. Retrieving topical sentiments from online document collections. In Document Recognition and Retrieval XI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jank, Wolfgang and Natasha Foutz. 2007. Using virtual stock exchanges to forecast box-office revenue via functional shape analysis. In The Prediction Markets Workshop at Electronic Commerce.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kim, Soo-Min and Eduard Hovy. 2007. Crystal: Analyzing predictive opinions on the web. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Koppel, M. and I. Shtrimberg. 2004. Good news or bad news? let the market decide. In AAAI Spring Symposium on Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text: Theories and Applications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lavrenko, V., M. Schmill, D. Lawrie, P. Ogilvie, D. Jensen, and J. Allan. 2000. Mining of concurrent text and time series. In KDD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Littlestone, Nick and Manfred K. Warmuth. 1989. The weighted majority algorithm. In IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. McDonald, R., K. Lerman, and F. Pereira. 2006. Multilingual dependency parsing with a two-stage discriminative parser. In Conference on Natural Language Learning (CoNLL). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Mittermayer, M. and G. Knolmayer. 2006. News-CATS: A news categorization and trading system. In International Conference in Data Mining. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Pennock, D. M., S. Lawrence, C. L. Giles, and F. A. Nielsen. 2000. The power of play: Efficiency and forecast accuracy in web market games. Technical Report 2000-168, NEC Research Institute.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Pennock, D. M., S. Lawrence, F. A. Nielsen, and C. L. Giles. 2001. Extracting collective probabilistic forecasts from web games. In KDD. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Serrano-Padial, Ricardo. 2007. Strategic foundations of prediction markets and the efficient markets hypothesis. In The Prediction Markets Workshop at Electronic Commerce.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Servan-Schreiber, E., J. Wolfers, D. M. Pennock, and B. Galebach. 2004. Prediction markets: Does money matter? Electronic Markets, 14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Toutanova, K., D. Klein, C. Manning, and Y. Singer. 2003. Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In HLT-NAACL. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Véronis, Jean. 2007. La presse a fait mieux que les sondeurs. http://aixtal.blogspot.com/2007/04/2007-la-presse-fait-mieux-que-les.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Wiebe, Janyce, Theresa Wilson, and Claire Cardie. 2005. Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. LREC, 39:165--210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Williams, L. V. 1999. Information efficiency in betting markets: A survey. Bulletin of Economic Research, 51:1--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Wolfers, J. and E. Zitzewitz. 2004. Prediction markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(2):107--126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Reading the markets: forecasting public opinion of political candidates by news analysis

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image DL Hosted proceedings
          COLING '08: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics - Volume 1
          August 2008
          1178 pages
          ISBN:9781905593446

          Publisher

          Association for Computational Linguistics

          United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 18 August 2008

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,537of1,537submissions,100%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader