skip to main content
10.1145/1592700.1592717acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesi-createConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An affordable, computerized, table-based exercise system for stroke survivors

Published:22 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Loss of hand function as a result of upper limb paresis after a stroke leads to a loss of independence and the strength of the paretic upper limb is strongly related to measures of activity. Robotic-assisted therapy with virtual reality, leads to improvements in motor function, but, there is a need to improve the cost-to-benefit ratio of these therapies. This case series study investigated an augmented reality computer game which provided a rewarded, goal-directed task to upper limb rehabilitation via a reaching task motivated by a computer game. A device was developed to increase the exercise effort for the table-based therapy. Of the 4 participants in the case study, 2 showed improvement in ability to play the game and in arm function. Participants felt that the system provided a worthwhile exercise that they would carry out in a home rehabilitation setting.

References

  1. Nakayama H., Jørgensen H. S., Raaschou H. O. and Olsen T. S. H. Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil., 75, (1994), 852--857.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Hunter S. M. and Crome P. Hand function and stroke. Rev Clin Gerontol., 12, 1 (2002), 68--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Sunderland A., Tinson D. J., Bradley E. L., Fletcher D., Langton Hewer R. and Wade D. T. Enhanced physical therapy improves recovery of arm function after stroke. A randomised clinical trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat., 55, (1992), 530--535.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Harris J. E. and Eng J. J. Paretic upper-limb strength best explains arm activity in people with stroke., Phys Ther 87, 1 (2007), 88--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Dobkin B. H. The Clinical Science of Neurologic Rehabilitation, Second Ed. Oxford University Press, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Krebs H. I., Volpe B. T. and Hogan N. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: from evidence-based to science-based rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil., 8, 4 (2002), 54--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Fasoli S. E., Krebs H. I., Stein J., Frontera W. R. and Hogan N. Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil., 84, 4 (2003), 477--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kwakkel G., Kollen B. J. and Krebs H. I. Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair., 22, (2007), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Fugl-Meyer A. R., Jaasko L., Leyman I., Olsson S. and Steglind S. The poststroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med., 7, 1 (1975), 13--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson M. J., Feng X., Johnson L. M. and Winters J. M. Potential of a suite of robot/computer-assisted motivating systems for personalized, home-based, stroke rehabilitation J. Neuroengineering Rehabil., 4, 6 (2007).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Hooper R. Learn about Robots: Industrial Robots. Retrieved March 10, 2009 from: http://www.learnaboutrobots.com/industrial.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Carr J. H., Shepherd R. B., Nordholm L. and Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Physical Therapy., 65 (1985), 175--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Wolf S. L. and Catlin P. A. Assessing Wolf Motor function Test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke., 32, (2001), 1635--1639.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Beaton D. E., Davis A. M., Hudak P. and McConnell S. The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) outcome measure: what do we know about it now? Br. J. Hand Ther., 6, 4 (2001), 109--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. An affordable, computerized, table-based exercise system for stroke survivors

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      i-CREATe '09: Proceedings of the 3rd International Convention on Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology
      April 2009
      222 pages
      ISBN:9781605587929
      DOI:10.1145/1592700
      • Conference Chairs:
      • Wei Tech Ang,
      • Wantanee Phantachat

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader