- 1 Bayles, M.D. Professional Ethics. Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif., 1981.Google Scholar
- 2 Bynum, T.W., Maner, W. and Fodor, j., Eds. Software Ownership and Intellectual Property Rights. Research Center on Computing and Society, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, Conn. 06515, 1992.Google Scholar
- 3 Clark, D. Computers at Risk: Safe Computing in the Information Age. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4 Denning, P.j., Ed. Computers under Attack: Intruders, Worms and Viruses. Addison-Wesley, Inc., Reading, Mass., 1990. Google Scholar
- 5 Dunlop, C. and Kling, R., Eds. Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices. Academic Press, New York, N.Y., 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6 Flaherty, D. Protecting Privacy in Surveillance Societies. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, N.C., 1989.Google Scholar
- 7 Forester, T. Software theft and the problem of intellectual property rights. Comput. Soc. 20, 1 (Mar. 1990), 2-11. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8 Frankel, M.S. Professional Codes: Why, How, and with What Impact? J. Bus. Ethics 8 (2 and 3) (1989), 109-116.Google Scholar
- 9 Frenkel, K.A. Women and computing. Commun. ACM 33, 11 (Nov. 1990), 34-46. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10 Gotterbarn, D. Computer ethics: Responsibility regained. National Forum (Summer 1991).Google Scholar
- 11 Gotterbarn, D. Editor's corner.J. Syst. Soft. 17 (Jan. 1992), 5-6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12 Guynes, C.S. Protecting statistical databases: A matter of privacy. Comput. Soc. 19, 1 (Mar. 1989), 15-23. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13 IEEE Computer Society Press. Proceedings of the Second Conference on Computers, Freedom and Privacy. (Los Alamitos, Calif.), IEEE Computer Society Pres, 1992.Google Scholar
- 14 Johnson, D.G. Computer Ethics, Second Ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1993.Google Scholar
- 15 Laudon, K.C. Dossier Society: Value Choices in the Design of National Information Systems. Columbia University Press, New York, N.Y., 1986. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16 Martin, C.D. and Murche-Beyma, E., Eds. In Search of Gender Free Paradigms for Computer Science Education. International Society for Technology in Education, Eugene, Ore., 1992.Google Scholar
- 17 National Research Council. Intellectual Property Issues in Software. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 1991.Google Scholar
- 18 Parker, D., Swope, S. and Baker, B. Ethical conflicts in information and computer science. Techology and Business. Wellesley, Mass. QED Information Sciences, 1990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 19 Parnas, D.L. SDI: A violation of professional responsibility. Abacus 4, 2 (Winter 1987), 46-52.Google Scholar
- 20 Perrolle, J.A. Computers and Social Change: Information, Property, and Power. Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif., 1987. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 21 Perrolle, J. Conversations and trust in computer interfaces. In Computers and Controversy. Dunlop and Kling, Eds., 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 22 Pressman, R.S. and Herron, R. Software Shock: The Danger and the Opportunity. Dorsett House, 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 23 Salpeter, J. Are you obeying copyright law? Technol. Learning 12, 8 (1992), 12-23.Google Scholar
- 24 Spafford, G. Are computer hacker break-ins ethical? J. Syst. Softw. 17 (Jan. 1992). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 25 Stevenson, J.T. Engineering Ethics: Practices and Principles. Canadian Scholars Press, Toronto, 1987.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Using the new ACM code of ethics in decision making
Recommendations
Does ACM’s code of ethics change ethical decision making in software development?
ESEC/FSE 2018: Proceedings of the 2018 26th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software EngineeringEthical decisions in software development can substantially impact end-users, organizations, and our environment, as is evidenced by recent ethics scandals in the news. Organizations, like the ACM, publish codes of ethics to guide software-related ...
Decision making process: typology, intelligence, and optimization
Decision making is concerned with evaluating and/or ranking possible alternatives of action. In this paper, we develop a model for the process of decision making. Understanding the decision process can provide insights into how humans make decisions, ...
Sustainable decision making: the role of decision support systems
Sustainable decision making stands for decision making which contributes to the transition to a sustainable society. It raises a number of challenging problems for which existing decision support systems (DSS) may not be equipped. The role of DSS in ...
Comments