skip to main content
10.5555/1558109.1558219guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Social network semantics for agent communication

Published:10 May 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we introduce a semantics for agent communication languages based on social networks, providing us with a principled way to define and reason about their dynamics. As an instance we consider dependence networks, where the social relations represent that an agent depends on another agent to achieve its intentions. We suggest how FIPA semantics can be reconstructed in this social semantics. Our approach reveals that we need special semantics for relations like ownership, authority or fear: all kinds of interesting social relations, not previously studied by multiagent systems.

References

  1. J. Austin. How to do things with words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass., 1962.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. G. Boella, R. Damiano, J. Hulstijn, and L. van der Torre. A common ontology of agent communication languages: Modelling mental attitudes and social commitments using roles. Applied Ontology, 2(3--4):217--265, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. G. Boella, L. Sauro, and L. van der Torre. Strengthening admissible coalitions. In ECAI'06, pages 195--199, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. P. Caire, S. Villata, L. van der Torre, and G. Boella. Conviviality masks in multiagent systems. In AAMAS'08, pages 1265--1268, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. Conte and J. Sichman. Multi-Agent Dependence by Dependence Graphs. In AAMAS'02, pages 483--490, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. N. Fornara and M. Colombetti. A commitment-based approach to agent communication. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 18(9--10):853--866, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. B. Gaudou, A. Herzig, D. Longin, and M. Nickles. A new semantics for the fipa agent communication language based on social attitudes. In ECAI'06, pages 245--249. IOS Press, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Hulstijn and N. Maudet. Uptake and joint action. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 7(2--3):175--191, 2006. Special issue on Cognition and Collective Intentionality. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Searle. The Construction of Social Reality. The Free Press, New York, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. P. Singh. A social semantics for agent communication languages. In Issues in Agent Communication (AC'00), LNCS 1916, pages 31--45. Springer, Berlin, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. N. Walton and E. C. Krabbe. Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. State University of New York Press, New York, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Social network semantics for agent communication

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image Guide Proceedings
          AAMAS '09: Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2
          May 2009
          730 pages
          ISBN:9780981738178

          Publisher

          International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

          Richland, SC

          Publication History

          • Published: 10 May 2009

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,155of5,036submissions,23%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader