Koen Hindriks
ABSTRACT
In our aim to develop a negotiation support system, we are faced with the need to express a user's preferences. The offers that are exchanged usually consist of multiple attributes. An agreement can only be reached if the preferences from both parties over these attributes and the complete offers are taken into account. The acceptablilty of an offer is defined in terms of the value that a negotiator attaches to it.
- C. Boutilier. Toward a logic for qualitative decision theory. In Proc. KR 1994, pages 75--86, 1994.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- C. Boutilier, R. I. Brafman, C. Domshlak, H. H. Hoos, and D. Poole. CP-nets: A tool for representing and reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements. J. Artificial Intelligence Research, 21:135--191, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Brewka. A rank based description language for qualitative preferences. In Proc. ECAI 2004, 2004.Google Scholar
- G. Brewka, S. Benferhat, and D. Le Berre. Qualitative choice logic. Artificial Intelligence, 157(1--2):203--237, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Coste-Marquis, J. Lang, P. Liberatore, and P. Marquis. Expressive power and succinctness of propositional languages for preference representation. In Proc. KR 2004, pages 203--212, 2004.Google Scholar
- J. Doyle and R. H. Thomason. Background to qualitative decision theory. AI Magazine, 20(2):55--68, 1999.Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Girard. Modal Logic for Belief and Preference Change. PhD thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 2008.Google Scholar
- R. L. Keeney and H. Raiffa. Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs. Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Liu. Changing for the Better: Preference Dynamics and Agent Diversity. PhD thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 2008.Google Scholar
- H. Prakken and G. A. W. Vreeswijk. Logics for defeasible argumentation. In D. Gabbay and F. Günthner, editors, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, volume 4, pages 219--318. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Reasoning about multi-attribute preferences
Recommendations
A decentralized model for multi-attribute negotiations
ICEC '06: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Electronic commerce: The new e-commerce: innovations for conquering current barriers, obstacles and limitations to conducting successful business on the internetThis paper presents a decentralized model that allows self-interested agents to reach "win-win" agreements in a multi-attribute negotiation. The model is based on an alternating-offer protocol. In each period, the proposing agent is allowed to make a ...
Multi-Attribute Decision Making Based on Attribute Importance Degree and Case-Based Reasoning
AbstractTo tackle a multi-attribute decision making problem, rough set and casebased reasoning are often combined. However, the reduction in a rough set is always complex. In this paper we provide a new relative importance measure about the ...
On possibilistic case-based reasoning for selecting partners for multi-attribute agent negotiation
AAMAS '05: Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systemsWe propose an enhanced mechanism for selecting partners for multi-attribute negotiation. The mechanism employs possibilistic case-based reasoning. The possibility of successful negotiation for each potential partner is predicted on the basis of its ...
Comments