skip to main content
10.5555/1556176.1556192acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Semantic interoperability architecture for electronic government

Authors Info & Claims
Published:17 May 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Semantic Interoperability is arguably the least developed aspect of Government Interoperability Frameworks. This could be explained by poor understanding of the semantic interoperability problem in government, considering its substance and scope, difficulties encountered in aligning technical solutions with the practice of government organizations, and the paucity of mature semantic technologies and complete semantic interoperability architectures and solutions (beyond metadata specification and semantic annotation of resources). As a result, most governments prefer to concentrate on technical and organizational aspects of their information sharing and interoperability efforts.

Based on generic requirements posed by information sharing initiatives, analysis of semantic interoperability scenarios in Electronic Government, and emerging semantic interoperability practices, this paper articulates a set of semantic interoperability requirements for Electronic Government considering policy, governance, organizational and technology dimensions. Based on such requirements, it develops a pair of reference models to guide the development of semantic interoperability capabilities for individual agencies involved in collaborations, and for the government as a whole. The paper also discusses how a concrete Semantic Interoperability Architecture (SIA) could be developed from the two reference models.

References

  1. Gartner, Preparation for Update European Interoperability Framework 2.0 -- Final Report, Engagement 221402470, 2007, at http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/servlets/Doc?id=29727.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Rothenberg, J., Botterman, M. and van Oranje-Nassau, C., Towards a Dutch Interoperability Framework -- Recommendations to the Forum Standaardisatie, RAND Corporation, 2008, at http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/2008/RAND_TR552.sum.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Billet, M., Bonomi, S., van der Graaf, E., Kirgiannakis, E., Loutas, N., van Overeem, A., Peristeras, V., Tarabanis, K, and Witters, J., Business, Semantic and Technical Requirements for Semantic e-Government Services at National and Pan-European Level, SemanticGov, FP6-2004- IST-4-027517, 2006, at: http://www.semantic-gov.org/index, php?name=UpDownload&req=getit&lid=311.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Moca, S. Nasir, A. v. Overeem, A., Paristeras, V., Russo, R., Tarabanis, K., Triantafyllou, E., Vitvar, T., Waterfeld, W., Winkler, K., and Witters, J., SemanticGov Project -- Overall Conceptual Analysis -- State of the Art Report, Deliverable - D1.2, IST STREP Project, FP6-204-IST-4-027517, ICT Research for Innovative Government, January 2006, at: http://www.enterprisearchitecture.info/Images/EIF/semanticg ov_ITI_D012_Final_State-of-the-art_Report.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Camarinha-Matos, L. M. and Afsarmanesh, H., A Modeling Framework for Collaborative Networked Organizations, IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Volume 224, Networ-Centric Collaboration and Supporting Fireworks, Boston Springer, pp 3--14, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Della Valle, E., Cerzza, D., Celino, I., Estublier, J., Vega, G., Kerrigan, M., Ramirez, J., Vallazon, B., Guarrera, P., Zhao, G., and Monteleone, G., SEEMP: a Semantic Interoperability Infrastructure for e-Government Services in the Employment Sector, at: http://www.seemp.org/. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Peristeras, V. and Tarabanis K., The Governance Enterprise Architecture (GEA) High-Level Object Model, LMGov 2004, Lecture Notes Artificial Intelligence (LNAI) 3035, pp. 85--94, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Creswell, A. M., Pardo, T. A., Canestraro, D. S, Dawes, S. S., and Juraga, D., Sharing Justice Information: A Capability Assessment Toolkit, Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, August 2005, SUNY, at: http://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/guides/sharing_justice_info/sharing_justice_info.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Pardo, T. A. and Burke, G. B., Improving Government Interoperability: A Capability Assessment Framework for Government Managers, Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, SUNY, October 2008, at: http://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/reports/improving_government_interoperability/improving_government_interoperability.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. CIO Council, A Practical Guide to Federal Enterprise Architecture Version 1.0, Enterprise Interoperability and Emerging Information technology Committee, Federal CIO Council, 2001, at www.gao.gov/bestpractices/bpeaguide.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Tschumperlin, J., Model-driven Semantic Interoperability using Open Standards: A Case Study, New Zealand Education Sector Architecture Framework (ESAF), June 2007, at: http://www.d-m-s.co.nz/Model-driven_Semantic_Interoperability_V1.0.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. E-Government Unit, European Commission, Study on Interoperability at Local and Regional Level. Interoperability Study Version 3, December 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. de Bruijn, J., Foxvog, D., and Zimmerman, K., Ontology Mediation Patterns, Deliverable D4.3.1, EU-IST Integrated Project (IP) IST-2003-506826 SEKT -- Semantically Enabled Knowledge Technologies, Library Version 1, 2005, at: http://www.sekt-project.com/rd/deliverables/wp04/sekt-d-4-3-1- Patterns%20library.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Australian Government, Australian Government Information Interoperability Framework, Australian Government Information Management Office -- AGIMO, April 2006, at http://www.finance.gov.au/publications/agimo/docs/Information_Interoperability_Framework.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Program Manager -- Information Sharing Environment, Information Sharing Environment - Enterprise Architecture Framework, August 2007, at: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/Expedition_Workshop/2007_09_18_OrganizingWorkshops_EnvisioningPossibilities_2008/ISE-FEA_v1.0_20070830.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Cabinet Office, e-Government Metadata Standard, e-Government Unit, Cabinet office, United Kingdom, Version 3.1, August 2006, at: http://www.govtalk.gov.uk/documents/eGMS%20version%203_1.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Peristeras, V., and Tarabanis, K., The Governance Enterprise Architecture (GEA) High-Level Object Model, LMGov 2004, LNAI 3035, pp. 85--94, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. FEA Program, Data Reference Model, CIO Council, Office of the Management and Budget, 2005, at http://www.ocio.usda.gov/e_arch/doc/DRM_2_0_Final.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. IDABC, IDABC Contents Interoperability Strategy, Working Paper, IDABC European e-Government Services, September 2005, at: http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/servlets/Doc?id=24405.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Pardo, T. A., Burke, G. B., Government Worth having: A briefing on interoperability for government leaders, Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, SUNY Oct. 2008, at http://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/reports/government_worth_having/government_worth_having.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Scholl, H. J., Interoperability in e-Government: More than Just Smart Middleware, Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1--10, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Klichewski, R., Semantic Web for E-Government, Electronic Government: Second International Conference, EGOV 2003, Prague, Czech Republic, September 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Kubicek, H. and Cimander, R., Three dimensions of organizational interoperability, European Journal of ePractice, No. 6, January 2009, epractice.eu.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Semantic interoperability architecture for electronic government

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader