ABSTRACT
Semantic Interoperability is arguably the least developed aspect of Government Interoperability Frameworks. This could be explained by poor understanding of the semantic interoperability problem in government, considering its substance and scope, difficulties encountered in aligning technical solutions with the practice of government organizations, and the paucity of mature semantic technologies and complete semantic interoperability architectures and solutions (beyond metadata specification and semantic annotation of resources). As a result, most governments prefer to concentrate on technical and organizational aspects of their information sharing and interoperability efforts.
Based on generic requirements posed by information sharing initiatives, analysis of semantic interoperability scenarios in Electronic Government, and emerging semantic interoperability practices, this paper articulates a set of semantic interoperability requirements for Electronic Government considering policy, governance, organizational and technology dimensions. Based on such requirements, it develops a pair of reference models to guide the development of semantic interoperability capabilities for individual agencies involved in collaborations, and for the government as a whole. The paper also discusses how a concrete Semantic Interoperability Architecture (SIA) could be developed from the two reference models.
- Gartner, Preparation for Update European Interoperability Framework 2.0 -- Final Report, Engagement 221402470, 2007, at http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/servlets/Doc?id=29727.Google Scholar
- Rothenberg, J., Botterman, M. and van Oranje-Nassau, C., Towards a Dutch Interoperability Framework -- Recommendations to the Forum Standaardisatie, RAND Corporation, 2008, at http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/2008/RAND_TR552.sum.pdf.Google Scholar
- Billet, M., Bonomi, S., van der Graaf, E., Kirgiannakis, E., Loutas, N., van Overeem, A., Peristeras, V., Tarabanis, K, and Witters, J., Business, Semantic and Technical Requirements for Semantic e-Government Services at National and Pan-European Level, SemanticGov, FP6-2004- IST-4-027517, 2006, at: http://www.semantic-gov.org/index, php?name=UpDownload&req=getit&lid=311.Google Scholar
- Moca, S. Nasir, A. v. Overeem, A., Paristeras, V., Russo, R., Tarabanis, K., Triantafyllou, E., Vitvar, T., Waterfeld, W., Winkler, K., and Witters, J., SemanticGov Project -- Overall Conceptual Analysis -- State of the Art Report, Deliverable - D1.2, IST STREP Project, FP6-204-IST-4-027517, ICT Research for Innovative Government, January 2006, at: http://www.enterprisearchitecture.info/Images/EIF/semanticg ov_ITI_D012_Final_State-of-the-art_Report.pdf.Google Scholar
- Camarinha-Matos, L. M. and Afsarmanesh, H., A Modeling Framework for Collaborative Networked Organizations, IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Volume 224, Networ-Centric Collaboration and Supporting Fireworks, Boston Springer, pp 3--14, 2006.Google Scholar
- Della Valle, E., Cerzza, D., Celino, I., Estublier, J., Vega, G., Kerrigan, M., Ramirez, J., Vallazon, B., Guarrera, P., Zhao, G., and Monteleone, G., SEEMP: a Semantic Interoperability Infrastructure for e-Government Services in the Employment Sector, at: http://www.seemp.org/. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peristeras, V. and Tarabanis K., The Governance Enterprise Architecture (GEA) High-Level Object Model, LMGov 2004, Lecture Notes Artificial Intelligence (LNAI) 3035, pp. 85--94, 2004.Google Scholar
- Creswell, A. M., Pardo, T. A., Canestraro, D. S, Dawes, S. S., and Juraga, D., Sharing Justice Information: A Capability Assessment Toolkit, Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, August 2005, SUNY, at: http://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/guides/sharing_justice_info/sharing_justice_info.pdf.Google Scholar
- Pardo, T. A. and Burke, G. B., Improving Government Interoperability: A Capability Assessment Framework for Government Managers, Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, SUNY, October 2008, at: http://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/reports/improving_government_interoperability/improving_government_interoperability.pdf.Google Scholar
- CIO Council, A Practical Guide to Federal Enterprise Architecture Version 1.0, Enterprise Interoperability and Emerging Information technology Committee, Federal CIO Council, 2001, at www.gao.gov/bestpractices/bpeaguide.pdf.Google Scholar
- Tschumperlin, J., Model-driven Semantic Interoperability using Open Standards: A Case Study, New Zealand Education Sector Architecture Framework (ESAF), June 2007, at: http://www.d-m-s.co.nz/Model-driven_Semantic_Interoperability_V1.0.pdf.Google Scholar
- E-Government Unit, European Commission, Study on Interoperability at Local and Regional Level. Interoperability Study Version 3, December 2006.Google Scholar
- de Bruijn, J., Foxvog, D., and Zimmerman, K., Ontology Mediation Patterns, Deliverable D4.3.1, EU-IST Integrated Project (IP) IST-2003-506826 SEKT -- Semantically Enabled Knowledge Technologies, Library Version 1, 2005, at: http://www.sekt-project.com/rd/deliverables/wp04/sekt-d-4-3-1- Patterns%20library.pdf.Google Scholar
- Australian Government, Australian Government Information Interoperability Framework, Australian Government Information Management Office -- AGIMO, April 2006, at http://www.finance.gov.au/publications/agimo/docs/Information_Interoperability_Framework.pdf.Google Scholar
- Program Manager -- Information Sharing Environment, Information Sharing Environment - Enterprise Architecture Framework, August 2007, at: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/Expedition_Workshop/2007_09_18_OrganizingWorkshops_EnvisioningPossibilities_2008/ISE-FEA_v1.0_20070830.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Cabinet Office, e-Government Metadata Standard, e-Government Unit, Cabinet office, United Kingdom, Version 3.1, August 2006, at: http://www.govtalk.gov.uk/documents/eGMS%20version%203_1.pdf.Google Scholar
- Peristeras, V., and Tarabanis, K., The Governance Enterprise Architecture (GEA) High-Level Object Model, LMGov 2004, LNAI 3035, pp. 85--94, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- FEA Program, Data Reference Model, CIO Council, Office of the Management and Budget, 2005, at http://www.ocio.usda.gov/e_arch/doc/DRM_2_0_Final.pdf.Google Scholar
- IDABC, IDABC Contents Interoperability Strategy, Working Paper, IDABC European e-Government Services, September 2005, at: http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/servlets/Doc?id=24405.Google Scholar
- Pardo, T. A., Burke, G. B., Government Worth having: A briefing on interoperability for government leaders, Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, SUNY Oct. 2008, at http://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/reports/government_worth_having/government_worth_having.pdf.Google Scholar
- Scholl, H. J., Interoperability in e-Government: More than Just Smart Middleware, Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1--10, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Klichewski, R., Semantic Web for E-Government, Electronic Government: Second International Conference, EGOV 2003, Prague, Czech Republic, September 2003.Google Scholar
- Kubicek, H. and Cimander, R., Three dimensions of organizational interoperability, European Journal of ePractice, No. 6, January 2009, epractice.eu.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Semantic interoperability architecture for electronic government
Recommendations
Towards an e-Government semantic interoperability assessment framework
ICEGOV '20: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceInteroperability is considered a key enabler for integrated public service provisioning. Moreover, a lot of experts claim that interoperability is a prerequisite for the reengineering of the organizational procedures in order to improve service ...
Metadata standards for semantic interoperability in electronic government
ICEGOV '08: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Theory and practice of electronic governanceEffective data sharing, across government agencies and other organisations, relies upon agreed meanings and representations. A key, technological challenge in electronic governance is to ensure that the meaning of data items is accurately recorded, and ...
Semantic interoperability architecture for Governance 2.0
Government 2.0: Making Connections between citizens, data and governmentThe increasing use of social media by governments for improving citizen access to information, participation of stakeholders in policy processes and delivery of customer-focused services are among the defining features of the so-called "Governance 2.0" ...
Comments