skip to main content
10.1145/1553374.1553477acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Detecting the direction of causal time series

Authors Info & Claims
Published:14 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

We propose a method that detects the true direction of time series, by fitting an autoregressive moving average model to the data. Whenever the noise is independent of the previous samples for one ordering of the observations, but dependent for the opposite ordering, we infer the former direction to be the true one. We prove that our method works in the population case as long as the noise of the process is not normally distributed (for the latter case, the direction is not identifiable). A new and important implication of our result is that it confirms a fundamental conjecture in causal reasoning --- if after regression the noise is independent of signal for one direction and dependent for the other, then the former represents the true causal direction --- in the case of time series. We test our approach on two types of data: simulated data sets conforming to our modeling assumptions, and real world EEG time series. Our method makes a decision for a significant fraction of both data sets, and these decisions are mostly correct. For real world data, our approach outperforms alternative solutions to the problem of time direction recovery.

References

  1. Balian, R. (1992). From microphysics to macrophysics. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Breidt, F. J., & Davis, R. A. (1991). Time-reversibility, identifiability and independence of innovations for stationary time series. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 13(5), 379--390.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brockwell, P. J., & Davis, R. A. (1991). Time Series: Theory and Methods. Springer, 2 edn. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Darmois, G. (1953). Analyse générale des liaisons stochastiques. Rev. Inst. Internationale Statist., 21, 2--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Diks, C., van Houwelingen, J., Takens, F., & DeGoede, J. (1995). Reversibility as a criterion for discriminating time series. Physics Letters A, 15, 221--228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. EEGdata (2008). This data set (experiment 4a, subject 3) can be downloaded after registration. Website, 3.6.2008, 3:51pm. http://ida.first.fraunhofer.de/projects/bci/competition_iii/#datasets.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gretton, A., Bousquet, O., Smola, A., & Schöölkopf, B. (2005). Measuring statistical dependence with Hilbert-Schmidt norms. In ALT, 63--78. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gretton, A., Fukumizu, K., Teo, C.-H., Song, L., Schölkopf, B., & Smola, A. (2008). A kernel statistical test of independence. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20, 585--592. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hawking, S. (1995). A brief history of time. Bantam.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoyer, P. O., Janzing, D., Mooij, J., Peters, J., & Schöölkopf, B. (2009). Nonlinear causal discovery with additive noise models. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Janzing, D. (2007). On causally asymmetric versions of Occam's Razor and their relation to thermodynamics. http://arxiv.org/abs/0708.3411.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jarque, C. M., & Bera, A. K. (1987). A test for normality of observations and regression residuals. International Statistical Review, 55 (2), 163--172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kankainen, A. (1995). Consistent testing of total independence based on the empirical characteristic function. PhD Thesis, University of Jyväskylä.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mamai, L. V. (1963). On the theory of characteristic functions. Select. Transl. Math. Stat. Probab., 4, 153--170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mandelbrot, B. (1967). On the distribution of stock price differences. Operations Research, 15 (6), 1057--1062.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Pearlmutter, B. A., & Parra, L. C. (1997). Maximum likelihood blind source separation: A context-sensitive generalization of ica. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 9, 613--619. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Peters, J., Janzing, D., Gretton, A., & Schöölkopf, B. (2009). Kernel methods for detecting the direction of time series. In: Proccedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the German Classification Society (GfKl 2008), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Reichenbach, H. (1999). The direction of time. Dover.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. RProject (2009). The r project for statistical computing. Website, 15.1.2009, 1:07pm. http://www.r-project.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Shimizu, S., Hoyer, P. O., Hyvärinen, A., & Kerminen, A. (2006). A linear non-gaussian acyclic model for causal discovery. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7, 2003--2030. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Skitovic, V. P. (1962). Linear combinations of independent random variables and the normal distribution law. Select. Transl. Math. Stat. Probab., 2, 211--228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Smola, A. J., Gretton, A., Song, L., & Schöölkopf, B. (2007). A Hilbert space embedding for distributions. In Algorithmic Learning Theory: 18th International Conference (ALT), 13--31. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Weiss, G. (1975). Time-reversibility of linear stochastic processes. J. Appl. Prob., 12, 831--836.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Detecting the direction of causal time series

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Other conferences
                ICML '09: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning
                June 2009
                1331 pages
                ISBN:9781605585161
                DOI:10.1145/1553374

                Copyright © 2009 Copyright 2009 by the author(s)/owner(s).

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 14 June 2009

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate140of548submissions,26%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader