skip to main content
10.1145/1542207.1542237acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacmatConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A semantic web based framework for social network access control

Published:03 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

The existence of on-line social networks that include person specific information creates interesting opportunities for various applications ranging from marketing to community organization. On the other hand, security and privacy concerns need to be addressed for creating such applications. Improving social network access control systems appears as the first step toward addressing the existing security and privacy concerns related to on-line social networks. To address some of the current limitations, we propose an extensible fine grained access control model based on semantic web tools. In addition, we propose authorization, admin and filtering policies that depend on trust relationships among various users, and are modeled using OWL and SWRL. Besides describing the model, we present the architecture of the framework in its support.

References

  1. B. Ali, W. Villegas, and M. Maheswaran. A trust based approach for protecting user data in social networks. In 2007 Conference of the Center for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research (CASCON'07), pages 288--293, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Berteau. Facebook's misrepresentation of Beacon's threat to privacy: Tracking users who opt out or are not logged in. CA Security Advisor Research Blog, Mar. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. Brickley and L. Miller. FOAF vocabulary specification 0.91. RDF Vocabulary Specification, Nov. 2007. Available at http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. B. Carminati, E. Ferrari, and A. Perego. Enforcing Access Control in Web-based Social Networks. ACM Transactions on Information & System Security, 2008. To appear, 4(3):191--233, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. B. Carminati, E. Ferrari, and A. Perego. Security and privacy in social networks. In M. Khosrow-Pour, editor, Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, 2nd Edition, volume VII, pages 3369--3376. IGI Publishing, Sept. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. H.-C. Choi, S. R. Kruk, S. Grzonkowski, K. Stankiewicz, B. Davis, and J. G. Breslin. Trust models for community aware identity management. In Identity, Reference, and the Web Workshop (IRW 2006), 2006. Available at: http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin/irw2006/skruk.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. N. Elahi, M. M. R. Chowdhury, and J. Noll. Semantic access control in web based communities. In ICCGI '08: Proceedings of the 2008 The Third International Multi-Conference on Computing in the Global Information Technology (iccgi 2008), pages 131--136, Washington, DC, USA, 2008. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. T. W. Finin, A. Joshi, L. Kagal, J. Niu, R. S. Sandhu, W. H. Winsborough, and B. M. Thuraisingham. Rowlbac: representing role based access control in owl. In SACMAT, pages 73--82, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. I. Horrocks, P. F. Patel-Schneider, H. Boley, S. Tabet, B. Grosof, and M. Dean. SWRL: A Semantic Web rule language combining OWL and RuleML. W3C Member Submission, World Wide Web Consortium, May 2004. Available at: http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. R. Kruk, S. Grzonkowski, H.-C. Choi, T. Woroniecki, and A. Gzella. D-FOAF: Distributed identity management with access rights delegation. In Proceedings of the 1st Asian Semantic Web Conference (ASWC 2006), LNCS 4185, pages 140--154. Springer Verlag, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. P. Mika. Social Networks and the Semantic Web, volume 5 of Semantic Web And Beyond Computing for Human Experience. Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. Tonti, J. Bradshaw, R. Jeffers, R. Montanari, N. Suri, and A. Uszok. Semantic Web Languages for Policy Representation and Reasoning: A Comparison of KAoS, Rei, and Ponder. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. World Wide Web Consortium. Defining n-ary relations on the semantic web, 2006. Available at:http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. World Wide Web Consortium. Status for resource description framework (rdf) model and syntax specification. Available at: http://www.w3.org/1999/.status/PR-rdf-syntax-19990105/status.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. I. Yague, M. del-mar Gallardo, and A. MaÜna. Semantic access control model: A formal specification. In ESORICS 2005, pages 24--43, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A semantic web based framework for social network access control

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SACMAT '09: Proceedings of the 14th ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies
          June 2009
          258 pages
          ISBN:9781605585376
          DOI:10.1145/1542207

          Copyright © 2009 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 3 June 2009

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          SACMAT '09 Paper Acceptance Rate24of75submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate177of597submissions,30%

          Upcoming Conference

          SACMAT 2024

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader