"show-me": water consumption at a glance to promote water conservation in the shower

ABSTRACT

Water is a scarce resource worldwide. Yet, we have many opportunities to conserve it. One particular opportunity for water conservation is the shower, because depending on the shower head and shower habits, an individual can save many liters of fresh water each day. Feedback proved to be an effective method to promote sustainable behavior. Therefore, in this paper we suggest to promote water conservation by providing feedback in form of an ambient display that can easily be integrated in current shower types. We built a prototype to study the potential of such a feedback device. These shower water meter (show-me) display the amount of water, that is used during one shower in form of LEDs assembled on a stick. Thus, an increasing water level is visualized. The user study revealed two groups. The subjects who considered themselves as ecologically conscious changed their behavior and turned the water down or off while soaping. Also, they are willing to pursue this behavior. Other subjects who did not have the goal to act more sustainable, were surprised about their water consumption and tried to reduce it. However, after the removal of the show-me device they did not maintain their behavior and fell back into their previous habit.

References

1. Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., and Rothengatter, T. 2005. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3):273--291.
2. Arvola, A., Uutela, A. & Anttila, U. 1993. Billing feedback as means to encourage household electricity conservation: a field experiment in Helsinki. In: Proc. of ECEEE.
3. Backlund, S., Gustafsson, A., Gyllenswärd, M., Ilstedt-Hjelm, S., Mazé, R. Redström, J. 2006. Static! The Aesthetics of Energy in Everyday Things. In Friedman, K., Love, T. and Corte-Real, E. (Eds.) Proceedings of Design Research Society Wonderground International Conference 2006.
4. Becker, L. J. 1978. Joint effect of feedback and goal setting on performance: A field study of residential energy conservation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4):428--433.
5. Benders, R., Kok, R., Moll, H., Wiersma, G., & Noorman, K. 2006. New approaches for household energy conservation in search of personal household energy budgets and energy reduction options. Energy Policy, 34 (18), 3612--3622.
6. BuildingGreen, Inc. 2001. GREENING FEDERAL FACILITIES An Energy, Environmental, and Economic Resource Guide for Federal Facility Managers and Designers. 2^nd ed. DOE/GO-102001-1165. U.S. Dept. of Energy
7. Darby, S. 2000. Making It Obvious: Designing Feedback into Energy Consumption. In Bertoldi, P., Ricci, A, & de. Almeida A. (Eds.). Energy Efficiency in Household Appliances and Lighting, 685--696. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.
8. Darby, S. (2006). The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption. A Review for DEFRA of the Literature on Metering, Billing and direct Displays, April.
9. DIY Kyoto: Wattson. http://www.diykyoto.com
10. Festinger, L. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.
11. Fogg, B. J. 2003. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kauffman Publishers, San Francisco.
12. Gustafsson, A., & Gyllenswäärd, M. 2005. The power-aware cord: energy awareness through ambient information display. In CHI '05: CHI '05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, (pp. 1423--1426). New York, NY, USA: ACM Press.
13. Mayer, P. W., Deoreo W. B. 1999. Residential Uses of Water. American Water Works Association.
14. McCalley, L. T.; Midden, G. J. H. 1998. Computer based systems in household appliances: the study of eco-feedback as a tool for increasing conservation behavior. In Computer Human Interaction. Proceedings. 3rd Asia Pacific, (1998) 344--349
15. McMakin AH., Malone, EL., Lundgren, R. E. 2002. Motivating residents to conserve energy without financial incentives. Environment and Behavior 34(6):848--864
16. Nakajima, T., Lehdonvirta, V., Tokunaga, E., & Kimura, H. (2008). Reflecting human behavior to motivate desirable lifestyle. In DIS '08: Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Designing interactive systems, (pp. 405--414). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
17. Plaue, C., Miller, T., & Stasko, J. 2004. Is a picture worth a thousand words?: an evaluation of information awareness displays. In GI '04: Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Graphics interface, (pp. 117--126). School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society.
18. Stringer, M., Fitzpatrick, G., Chalmers, D., Harris, E., Krishna, R., & Haarlander, M. 2007. Kuckuck -- exploring ways of sensing and displaying energy consumption information in the home. In Workshop on Ubiquitous Sustainability: Technologies for Green Values (at UbiComp 2007).
19. Thøgersen, J. 2004. A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24 (1), 93--103.
20. UN International Year of Freshwater 2003 http://www.un.org/events/water
21. van Vugt, M. and Samuelson, C. D. 1999. The impact of personal metering in the management of a natural resource crisis: A social dilemma analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(6):735--750.
22. Weiser, M., and Brown, J. (1996). Designing Calm Technology. PowerGrid Journal, v1.01, July 1996. (see http://nano.xerox.com/hypertext/weiser/calmtech/calmtech.htm

Index Terms

• Applied computing

  • Law, social and behavioral sciences

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)