skip to main content
10.1145/1531674.1531710acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How and why people Twitter: the role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 May 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Micro-blogs, a relatively new phenomenon, provide a new communication channel for people to broadcast information that they likely would not share otherwise using existing channels (e.g., email, phone, IM, or weblogs). Micro-blogging has become popu-lar quite quickly, raising its potential for serving as a new informal communication medium at work, providing a variety of impacts on collaborative work (e.g., enhancing information sharing, building common ground, and sustaining a feeling of connectedness among colleagues). This exploratory research project is aimed at gaining an in-depth understanding of how and why people use Twitter - a popular micro-blogging tool - and exploring micro-blog's poten-tial impacts on informal communication at work.

References

  1. Abrams, L.C., Cross, R.L, and Levin, D.Z. 2003. Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge sharing networks. Academy of Management Executive, 2003, Vol.17, No. 4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, C. 2006. Social Psychology. Published by SAGE, 2006 ISBN 1412918405, 200 pagesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark, H.H. & Brennan, S.E. 1991. Grounding in communication. In L.B. Resnick, J. Levine, & S.D. Teasley (Eds.) Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp.127--149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dabbish, L., Kraut, R., Fussell, S. & Kiesler, S. 2005. Understanding email use: predicting action on a message. In Proceedings of CHI'05. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. DiMicco, J., Millen, D.R., Geyer, W., Dugan, C., Brownholtz, B., & Muller, M. 2008. Motivations for social networking at work. In Proceedings of CSCW'08. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dunbar, R. 1998. The Social Brain Hypothesis. Evol. Anthropol. 6,178--190Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Efimova, L. and Grudin, J. 2007. Crossing boundaries: A case study of employee blogging. In Proc HICSS'07. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Erickson, T. and Kellogg, W.A. 2000. Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Granovetter, M.D. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78, No. 6., pp 1360--1380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Granovetter, M.D. 2004. The Impact of Social Structures on Economic Development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 19, No.1, pp 33--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Huh, J., Jones, L., Erickson, T., Kellogg, W.A., Bellamy, R., Thomas, J.C. 2007. BlogCentral: The Role of Internal Blogs at Work. CHI 2007 Work in Progress, April 2007, San Jose, CA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jackson, A., Yates, J. and Orlikowski, W. 2007. Corporate Blogging: Building community through persistent digital talk. In Proc HICSS'07, 80 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T. & Tseng, B. 2007. Why we twitter: Understanding micro-blogging usage and communities. Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Johnson, J.D., Donohue, W.A., Atkin, C.K. & Johnson, S. 1994. Differences between formal and informal communication channels. Journal of business communication.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Kraut, R., Fish, R., Root, R. & Chalfonte, B. 1993. Informal Communication in Organizations: form, function, and technology. Proceedings of CSCW'93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Levin, D.Z., Cross, R.L, and Abrams, L.C. 2002. The strength of weak ties you can trust: the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer, Best Papers Proceedings of the Academy of Management, 2002Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. McFedries, P. 2007. Technically speaking: All a twitter. IEEE Spectrum, 44(10), 84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Millen, D.R., Feinberg, J. and Kerr, B. 2006. Dogear: Social bookmarking in the enterprise. In Proc CHI'06, 111--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Nardi, B.A. 2005. Beyond bandwidth: Dimensions of connection in interpersonal communication. Journal of CSCW. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Nardi, B.A., Schiano, D.J. & Gumbrecht, M. 2004. Blogging as social activity, or, would you let 900 million people read your diary? In Proc. CSCW 2004, pp. 222--231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Perlow, L.A. 1999. The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 57--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Rawlins, W.K. 1992. Friendship matters: Communication, dialectics, and the life course. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Thom-Santelli, J., Muller, M.J. and Millen, D.R. 2008. Social Tagging Roles: Publishers, Evangelists, Leaders. In Proc CHI '08, 1041--1044. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Whittaker, S. 2003. Theories and methods in mediated communication. In Graesser, A., Gernsbacher, M., and Goldman, S. (Ed.) The Handbook of Discourse Processes (pp. 243--286). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Whittaker, S., Frohlich, D. & Daly-Jones, W. 1994. Informal Workplace Communication: What is it Like and How Might We Support It? Proceedings of CHI'94, pp. 131--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. How and why people Twitter: the role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GROUP '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
      May 2009
      412 pages
      ISBN:9781605585000
      DOI:10.1145/1531674

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 May 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      GROUP '09 Paper Acceptance Rate40of110submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate125of405submissions,31%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader