An evaluation of coordination techniques for protecting objects and territories in tabletop groupware

ABSTRACT

Indirect input techniques allow users to quickly access all parts of tabletop workspaces without the need for physical access; however, indirect techniques restrict the available social cues that are seen on direct touch tables. This reduced awareness results in impoverished coordination; for example, the number of conflicts might increase since users are more likely to interact with objects that another person is planning to use. Conflicts may also arise because indirect techniques reduce territorial behavior, expanding the interaction space of each collaborator. In this paper, we introduce three new tabletop coordination techniques designed to reduce conflicts arising from indirect input, while still allowing users the flexibility of distant object control. Two techniques were designed to promote territoriality and to allow users to protect objects when they work near their personal areas, and the third technique lets users set their protection levels dynamically. We present the results of an evaluation, which shows that people prefer techniques that automatically provide protection for personal territories, and that these techniques also increase territorial behavior.

References

1. Brignull, H., Izadi, S., Fitzpatrick, G., Rogers, Y., Rodden, T. The introduction of a shared interactive surface into a communal space. Proc. CSCW '04, 49--58.
2. Dietz, P.H., Leigh, D.L. DiamondTouch: a multi-user touch technology. Proc. UIST 2001, 219--226.
3. Forlines, C., Wigdor, D., Shen, C., Balakrishnan, R. Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays. Proc. CHI 2007, 647--656.
4. Geifler, J. Shuffle, throw or take it! working efficiently with an interactive wall. Proc. CHI 1998, 265--266.
5. Ha, V., Inkpen, K., Mandryk, R., and Whalen, T. Direct intentions: the effects of input devices on collaboration around a tabletop display. Proc. TableTop 2006, 177--84.
6. Hascoët, M. Throwing models for large displays. Proc. HCI 2003, British HCI Group, 73--77.
7. Hinrichs, U., Carpendale, S., Scott, S.D. Evaluating the effects of fluid interface components on tabletop collaboration. Proc. AVI 2006, 27--34.
8. Jun, L., Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C., and Subramanian, S. Improving digital handoff in shared tabletop workspaces. Proc. IEEE Tabletop 2008, pp. 11--18.
9. Kruger, R., Carpendale, S., Scott, S.D., Greenberg, S. How people use orientation on tables: comprehension, coordination and communication. GROUP '03, 369--78.
10. Morris, M. R., Ryall, K., Shen, C., Forlines, C., Vernier, F. Beyond "social protocols": multi-user coordination policies for co-located groupware. Proc. CSCW 2004, 262--65.
11. Nacenta, M., Pinelle, D., Stuckel, D., and Gutwin, C. The effects of interaction technique on coordination in tabletop groupware. Proc. GI 2007, 191--198.
12. Parker, J., Mandryk, R., and Inkpen, K. Integrating point and touch for interaction with digital tabletop displays. IEEE Computer Graphics and App., 26(5), 2006, 28--35.
13. Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C. Evaluating teamwork support in tabletop groupware applications using collaboration usability analysis. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 12(3), 2008, 237--254.
14. Pinelle, D., Nacenta, M., Gutwin, C., Stach, T. The effects of co-present embodiments on awareness and collaboration in tabletop groupware. Proc. GI 2008, 1--8.
15. Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C., and Subramanian, S. Designing digital tables for highly integrated collaboration. HCI-TR-06-02, Comp Sci Dept, Univ. Saskatchewan, 2006.
16. Pinelle, D., Dyck, J., Gutwin, C., Stach, T. Cutouts: multiple views for tabletop groupware, HCI-TR-06-04, Comp. Science Dept, University of Saskatchewan, 2006.
17. Rekimoto, J. and Saitoh, M. Augmented surfaces: a spatially continuous work space for hybrid computing environments. Proc. CHI 1999, 378--385.
18. Ryall, K., Forlines, C., Shen, C., Ringel Morris, M. Exploring the effects of group size and table size of interactions with tabletop shared-display groupware. Proc. CSCW 2004, 284--293.
19. Scott, S.D., Carpendale, M.S., Habelski, S. Storage bins: mobile storage for collaborative tabletop displays. IEEE Computer Graphics and App., 25(4), 2005, 58--65.
20. Scott, S.D., Carpendale, S., Inkpen, K.M. Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces. Proc. CSCW 2004.
21. Scott, S. D., Grant, K. D., and Mandryk, R. L. System guidelines for co-located, collaborative work on a tabletop display. Proc. ECSCW 2003, 159--178.
22. SDG: Single Display Groupware Toolkit. http://grouplab.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/
23. Stach, T., Gutwin, C., Pinelle, D., Irani, P. Improving recognition and characterization in groupware with rich embodiments. Proc. CHI 2007, 11--20.
24. Swaminathan, K. and Sato, S. Interaction design for large displays. interactions, 4(1), 1997, 15--24.
25. Tang, A., Tory, M., Po, B., Neumann, P., and Carpendale, M.S. Collaborative coupling over tabletop displays. Proc. CHI 2006, 1181--1190.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Collaborative and social computing

    • Collaborative and social computing theory, concepts and paradigms

      • Computer supported cooperative work

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing and business

      • Computer supported cooperative work