skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1518990acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designable visual markers

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Visual markers are graphic symbols designed to be easily recognised by machines. They are traditionally used to track goods, but there is increasing interest in their application to mobile HCI. By scanning a visual marker through a camera phone users can retrieve localised information and access mobile services.

One missed opportunity in current visual marker systems is that the markers themselves cannot be visually designed, they are not expressive to humans, and thus fail to convey information before being scanned. This paper provides an overview of d-touch, an open source system that allows users to create their own markers, controlling their aesthetic qualities. The system runs in real-time on mobile phones and desktop computers. To increase computational efficiency d-touch imposes constraints on the design of the markers in terms of the relationship of dark and light regions in the symbols. We report a user study in which pairs of novice users generated between 3 and 27 valid and expressive markers within one hour of being introduced to the system, demonstrating its flexibility and ease of use.

References

  1. d-touch source code. http://sourceforge.net/projects/libdtouch.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Mobile codes consortium. http://www.mobilecodes.org/, February 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ross Bencina, Martin Kaltenbrunner, and Sergi Jordà. Improved topological fiducial tracking in the reactivision system. In Proc. IEEE International Workshop on Projector--Camera Systems (Procams 2005), San Diego, USA, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Enrico Costanza and Leinss Mirja. Telling a story on a tag: The importance of markers' visual design for real world applications (paper presentation). In Proceedings of the Mobile Interaction with the Real World Workshop at Mobile HCI2006, Espoo, Finland, sep 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Enrico Costanza and John Robinson. A region adjacency tree approach to the detection and design of fiducials. In VVG, pages 63--69, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Enrico Costanza, Simon B Shelley, and John Robinson. D-touch: A consumer-grade tangible interface module and musical applications. In Proceedings of Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI03), 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Enrico Costanza, Simon B Shelley, and John Robinson. Introducing audio d-touch: A tangible user interface for music composition and performance. In Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Digital Audio EffectsDAFx03, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Diego Lopez de Ipina, Paulo R. S. Mendonca, and Andy Hopper. Trip: A low-cost vision-based location system for ubiquitous computing. Personal Ubiquitous Comput., 6(3):206--219, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Mark Fiala. Artag, a fiducial marker system using digital techniques. In CVPR (2), pages 590--596, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. ISO. International standard, iso/iec18004. ISO International Standard, Jun 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. ISO. International standard, iso/iec16022â"international symbology specification, data matrix. ISO standard, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Woodland Norman J. and Bernard Silver. Classifying apparatus and method, October 1952.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. David J. Johnston and Adrian F. Clark. A vision-based location system using fiducials. In VVG, pages 159--166, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. H. Kato and Mark Billinghurst. Marker tracking and hmd calibration for a video-based augmented reality conferencing system. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Augmented Reality (IWAR 99), San Francisco, USA, October 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kaj Mäkelä, Sara Belt, Dan Greenblatt, and Jonna Häkkilä. Mobile interaction with visual and rfid tags: a field study on user perceptions. In CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 991--994, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mathias Mohring, Christian Lessig, and Oliver Bimber. Video see-through ar on consumer cell-phones. In ISMAR '04: Proceedings of the Third IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR'04), pages 252--253, Washington, DC, USA, 2004. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Takao Nakamura, Atsushi Katayama, Masashi Yamamuro, and Noboru Sonehara. Fast watermark detection scheme from camera-captured images on mobile phones. IJPRAI, 20(4):543--564, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Eamonn O'Neill, Peter Thompson, Stavros Garzonis, and Andrew Warr. Reach out and touch: Using nfc and 2d barcodes for service discovery and interaction with mobile devices. In Anthony LaMarca, Marc Langheinrich, and Khai N. Truong, editors, Pervasive, volume 4480 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 19--36. Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jun Rekimoto. Navicam: A magnifying glass approach to augmented reality systems. Teleoperators and Virtual Environ., 6(4):399--412, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jun Rekimoto and Yuji Ayatsuka. Cybercode: designing augmented reality environments with visual tags. In DARE '00: Proceedings of DARE 2000 on Designing augmented reality environments, pages 1--10, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Michael Rohs and Philipp Zweifel. A conceptual framework for camera phone-based interaction techniques. In Pervasive Computing: Third International Conference, PERVASIVE 2005, number 3468 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), Munich, Germany, May 2005. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Azriel Rosenfeld. Adjacency in digital pictures. Information and Control, 26(1):24--33, September 1974.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Ron Shamir and Dekel Tsur. Faster subtree isomorphism. J. Algorithms, 33(2):267--280, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. G. Thomas, J. Jin, T. Niblett, and C. Urquhart. A versatile camera position measurement system for virtual reality tv production. In Proc. Internat. Broadcasting Convention (IBC'97), pages 284--289, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Tikiwiki. http://tikiwiki.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Eleanor Toye, Richard Sharp, Anil Madhavapeddy, David Scott, Eben Upton, and Alan Blackwell. Interacting with mobile services: an evaluation of camera-phones and visual tags. Personal Ubiquitous Comput., 11(2):97--106, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Designable visual markers

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2426 pages
      ISBN:9781605582467
      DOI:10.1145/1518701

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader