skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1518789acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Wetpaint: scraping through multi-layered images

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

We introduce a technique for exploring multi-layered images by scraping arbitrary areas to determine meaningful relationships. Our system, called Wetpaint, uses perceptual depth cues to help users intuitively navigate between corresponding layers of an image, allowing a rapid assessment of changes and relationships between different views of the same area. Inspired by art diagnostic techniques, this tactile method could have distinct advantages in the general domain as shown by our user study. We propose that the physical metaphor of scraping facilitates the process of determining correlations between layers of an image because it compresses the process of planning, comparison and annotation into a single gesture. We discuss applications for geography, design, and medicine.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

34.flv

flv

17.8 MB

p571.mov

mov

27.8 MB

1518789.mp4

mp4

64.5 MB

References

  1. Baudisch, P., Good, N., Stewart, P. Focus plus context screens: combining display technology with visualization techniques. Proc. UIST 2001, ACM Press (2001), 31--0. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Baudisch, P., Gutwin, C. Multiblending: displaying overlapping windows simultaneously without the drawbacks of alpha blending. Proc. CHI 2004. ACM Press (2004), 367--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Benko, H., Ishak, E. W., Feiner, S. Collaborative Mixed Reality Visualization of an Archaeological Excavation. Proc. ISMAR 2004. IEEE Computer Society (2004), 132--0. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bier, E. A., Stone, M. C., Pier, K., Buxton, W., and DeRose, T. D. Toolglass and Magic Lenses: The See-Through Interface. Proc. SIGGRAPH 1993. ACM Press (1993), 73--0 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cassinelli, A., Ishikawa, M. Khronos projector. Proc. SIGGRAPH 2005 Emerging Technologies. ACM Press (2005), 10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Grabczewski, E., Cosmas, J., Van Santen, P., Green, D., Itagaki, T., Weimer, F. 3D MURALE: multimedia database system architecture. Proc. VAST 2001. ACM Press (2001), 315--2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dragicevic, P. Combining crossing-based and paper-based interaction paradigms for dragging and dropping between overlapping windows. Proc. UIST 2004. ACM Press (2004), 193--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dunn, R. The virtual dig. SIGGRAPH 2002 Conference Abstracts and Applications. ACM Press (2002), 122--3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Harrison, B. L., Ishii, H., Vicente, K. J., and Buxton, W. A. Transparent layered user interfaces: an evaluation of a display design to enhance focused and divided attention. Proc. CHI 1995. ACM Press (1995), 317--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Huang, Y., Brown, M. S. User-assisted ink-bleed correction for handwritten documents. Proc. JCDL 2008. ACM Press (2008), 263--1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ishak, E. W., Feiner, S. K. Interacting with hidden content using content-aware free-space transparency. Proc. UIST 2004. ACM Press (2004), 189--2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ishii, H., Ullmer, B. Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. Proc. CHI 1997. ACM Press (1997), 234--1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Möller, C., Seracini, M. The third dimension of "Ritratto di gentiluomo". SIGGRAPH 1996 Visual Proc. ACM Press (1996), 11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Pietriga, E., Appert, C. Sigma lenses: focus-context transitions combining space, time and translucence. Proc. CHI 2008. ACM Press (2008). 1343--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ratti, C., Wang, Y., Piper, B., Ishii, H., and Biderman, A. PHOXEL-SPACE: an interface for exploring volumetric data with physical voxels. Proc. DIS 2004. ACM Press (2004), 289--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sekuler et al. Perception, Fourth Edition. Boston: McGraw Hill, 2002, 331--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Shneiderman, B. Direct manipulation for comprehensible, predictable and controllable user interfaces. Proc. IUI '97. ACM Press (1997), 33--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Zhai, S., Buxton, W., Milgram, P. The partial-occlusion effect: utilizing semitransparency in 3D human-computer interaction. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 3, 3 (Sep. 1996), 254--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Wetpaint: scraping through multi-layered images

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2426 pages
      ISBN:9781605582467
      DOI:10.1145/1518701

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader