Butler lies: awareness, deception and design

ABSTRACT

Instant messaging (IM) is a common and popular way for co-workers, friends, and family to stay in touch, but its"always-on properties can sometimes lead people to feel overexposed or too readily available to others for conversation. This, in turn, may lead people to deceive others about their actual status or availability. In this paper, we introduce the notion of the "butler lie to describe lies that allow for polite initiation and termination of conversations. We present results from a field study of 50 IM users, in which participants rated each of their messages at the time of sending to indicate whether or not it was deceptive. About one tenth of all IM messages were rated as lies and, of these, about one fifth were butler lies. These results suggest that butler lies are an important social practice in IM, and that existing approaches to interpersonal awareness, which focus on accurate assessment of availability, may need to take deception and other social practices into account.

References

1. Aoki, P. and Woodruff, A., Making space for stories: ambiguity in the design of personal communication systems. In ACM CHI (2005), 181--190.
2. Begole, J., Matsakis, N. and Tang, J., Lilsys: Inferring Unavailability Using Sensors. In ACM CSCW (2004), 511--514.
3. Bellotti, V. and Bly, S., Walking Away from the Desktop Computer: Distributed Collaboration and Mobility in a Product Design Team. In ACM CSCW (1996), 209--218.
4. Birnholtz, J., Gutwin, C., Ramos, G. and Watson, M., OpenMessenger: Gradual Initiation of Interaction for Distributed Workgroups. In ACM CHI(2008), 1661--1664.
5. Boehner, K. and Hancock, J., Advancing Ambiguity. In ACM CHI(2006), 103--107.
6. Boyle, M. and Greenberg, S. The Language of Privacy: Learning from Video Media Space Analysis and Design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 12, 2 (2005). 328--370.
7. Brown, P. and Levinson, S. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 1987.
8. Burgoon, J., Stoner, G.M., Bonito, J.A. and Dunbar, N.E., Trust and deception in mediated communication. In HICSS(2003), 44.
9. Camden, C., Motley, M.C. and Wilson, A. White lies in interpersonal communication: a taxonomy and preliminary investigation of social motivations. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 48, (1984). 309--325.
10. Clement, A. Considering privacy in the development of multi-media communications. CSCW, 2, (1994). 67--88.
11. Davis, S. and Gutwin, C., Using Relationship to Control Disclosure in Awareness Servers. In Graphics Interface '05(2005), 75--84.
12. DePaulo, B.M., Kashy, D.A., Kirkendol, S.E., Wyer, M.M. and Epstein, J.A. Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, (1996). 979--995.
13. DePaulo, B.M., Kashy, D.A., Kirkendol, S.E. and Wyer, M.W. Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70, (1996). 979--995.
14. DePaulo, B.M., Lindsay, J.J., Malone, B.E., Muhlenbruck, Charlton, K. and Cooper, H. Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, (2003). 74--118.
15. Dourish, P. and Bly, S., Portholes: Supporting awareness in a distributed work group. In ACM CHI(1992), 541--547.
16. Feldman, R.S., J.A., F. and Happ, B.R. Self-presentation and verbal deception: do self-presenters lie more? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, (2002). 163--170.
17. Fish, R., Kraut, R. and Root, R., Evaluating Video as a Technology for Informal Communication. In ACM CHI, (1992), 37--48.
18. Fogarty, J., Hudson, S.E., Atkeson, C.G., Avrahami, D., Forlizzi, J., Kiesler, S., Lee, J.C. and Yang, J. Predicting Human Interruptibility with Sensors. 12, 1 (2005). 119--146.
19. Greenberg, S. and Rounding, M., The notification collage: posting information to public and personal displays. In ACM CHI(2001), 514--521.
20. Hancock, J. Digital deception: when, where and how people lie online. in Harrington, B. ed. Deception: methods, contexts and consequences (Santa Fe Institute), Stanford Press, Palo Alto, CA, 2007.
21. Hancock, J., Thom-Santelli, J. and Ritchie, T., Deception and design: The impact of communication technologies on lying behavior. In ACM CHI (2004), 130--136.
22. Hancock, J.T., Curry, L., Goorha, S. and Woodworth, M.T. On lying and being lied to: a linguistic analysis of deception. Discourse Processes, 45, (2008). 1--23.
23. Hinds, P. and Kiesler, S. Distributed Work. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002.
24. Hudson, S.E. and Smith, I., Techniques for addressing fundamental privacy and disruption tradeoffs in awareness support systems. In ACM CSCW, (1996), 248--257.
25. Isaacs, E. and Clark, H.H. Ostensible invitations. Language in Society, 19, (1990). 493--509.
26. Isaacs, E., Walendowski, A. and Ranganathan, D., Hubbub: A Sound-enhanced Mobile Instant Messenger that Supports Awareness and Opportunistic Interactions. In ACM CHI (2002), 179--186.
27. Kraut, R., Brynin, M. and Kiesler, S. Computers, Phones and the Internet: Domesticating Information Technology. Oxford U. Press, Oxford, UK, 2006.
28. Kraut, R., Egido, C. and Galegher, J., Patterns of Contact and Communication in Scientific Research Collaboration. In ACM CSCW(1988), 1--12.
29. Mark, G., Gudith, D. and Klocke, U. The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress. In ACM CHI (2008). 107--110.
30. McEwan, G. and Greenberg, S., Supporting social worlds with the community bar. In ACM GROUP (2005), 21--30.
31. McFarlane, D.C. and Latorella, K.A. The scope and importance of human interruption in human-computer interaction design. Human Computer Interaction, 17, 1 (2002). 1--61.
32. Nardi, B., Whittaker, S. and Bradner, E., Interaction and outeraction: Instant Messaging in action. In ACM CSCW (2000), 79--88.
33. O'Sullivan, P.B. What you don't know won't hurt me: impression management functions of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research, 26, 3 (2000). 403--431.
34. Olson, G.M. and Olson, J.S. Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, (2001). 139--179.
35. Roberts, R. The House Servant's Directory. Charles S. Francis, New York, 1827.
36. Schegloff, E.A. and Sachs, H. Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 4 (1973). 290--327.
37. Schmidt, K. The problem with 'awareness'. CSCW, 11, (2002). 285--286.
38. Shiu, E. and Lenhart, A. How Americans use instant messaging, Pew Internet&American Life Project, Washington DC, 2004.
39. Smale, S. and Greenberg, S., Broadcasting information via display names in instant messaging. In ACM GROUP(2005), 89--98.
40. Tang, J. Approaching and leave-Taking: Negotiating Contact in Computer-Mediated Communication. ACM TOCHI, 14, 1 (2007). 1--26.
41. Toma, C., Hancock, J.T. and Ellison, N. Separating fact from fiction: an examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, (2008). 1023--1036.
42. Vanden Abeele, M. and Roe, K. White cyberlies: The use of deceptive instant messaging statuses as a social norm Paper presented at the Conference of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada, 2008.
43. Whittaker, S. and Sidner, C., Email overload: exploring personal information management. In ACM CHI(1996), 276--283.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Collaborative and social computing

    • Collaborative and social computing systems and tools

      • Synchronous editors

• Information systems

  • Information systems applications

    • Collaborative and social computing systems and tools

      • Synchronous editors