skip to main content
10.1145/1517744.1517761acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mobile phone usage of young adults: the impact of motivational factors

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 December 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

To increase marketability in a competitive and technologically evolving market designers are compelled to add new features to mobile phones. This often leads to 'featuritis' with hit-and-miss success rates. Our research goal is to find a more informed point of departure for feature addition activities that will improve design and maximise return on investment. We argue that a human motivational factor focus could provide a solid grounding for judging whether features are likely to be used, or not. In this paper we address the motivational factors that underlie mobile phone use by young adults aged between 18 and 30. We consider models for motivational factors from psychology and consumer science, as well as mobile phone usage space models, including the mobile phone usage space model (MUSM). MUSM proposes linking usage spaces to motivational factors, but does not explicitly investigate the mapping of features to the identified usage spaces. In this paper we investigate the features associated with individual MUSM usage spaces as well as the ranking of the usage spaces for our specific target group.

References

  1. Alahatuha, P., Ahola, J., Hakala, H.: Mobilizing business applications: a survey about the opportunities and challenges of mobile business applications and services in Finland. Technology Review of Tekes. 167/2005 (2005), 1--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chung, K. H.: A Markov Chain Model of Human Needs: An Extension of Maslow's Need Theory. Academy of Management Journal. 12(2) (1969), 223--234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Croasmun, J.: Are Ergonomists Really Consulted in Mobile Phone Design? Ergoweb. July 16, http://www.ergoweb.com/news/ (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M.: The "What" and 'Why" of Goal pursuits: Human Needs and Self-Determination of Behaviour. Psychological Inquiry. 11(4) (2000), 227--268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Deckers, L.: Motivation: Biological, Psychological, and Environmental. Second ed. Allyn & Bacon, (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Donner, J.: "Microentrepreneurs and Mobiles: An Exploration of the Uses of Mobile Phones by Small Business Owners in Rwanda. Information Technologies and International Development. 2(1) (2004), 1--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Han, S. H., Kim, J. K., Yun, M. H., Hong, S. W., Kim, J. H.: Identifying Mobile Phone Design Features Critical to user Satisfaction. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing. 14(1) (2004), 15--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Herzberg, F.: One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review. 46(1) (1968), 53--62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Institute for Manufacturing: Innovation and Design Management. (2006) {cited 2006 2006/10/04}; Available from: http://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/ctm/idm/tools/-definition/kano.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Lang, K. R., Takeda, Y., Tuunainen, V. K.: Mobile commerce at crossroads. Communications of the ACM. 46(12) (2003), 41--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jokela, T.: When Good Things Happen to Bad Products: Where are the Benefits of Usability in the Consumer Appliance Market? Interactions. 11(6) (2004), 28--35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., Tsuji, S., Attractive quality and must-be quality. In: J. D. Hromi, (eds.): The Best on Quality. ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kano, N., Tsuji, S., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F.: 'Miryokuteki Himshitsu to Atarimae Himshitsu' (Attractive Quality Mustbe Quality). "Hinshitsu" (Quality), Japan Society for Quality Control. 14(2) (1984), 147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kiljander, H.: Evolution and Usability of Mobile Phone Interaction Styles. Thesis, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kleijnen, M., Wetzels, M., De Ruyter, K.: Consumer acceptance of wireless finance. Journal of Financial Services Marketing. 8(3) (2004), 206--217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kwon, H. S., Chidambaram, L., A test of the technology acceptance model: The case of cellular telephone adoption. In: (eds.): Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society, Hawaii, 2000, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lindgren, H. C.: An introduction to Social Psychology. second ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, (1969).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ling, C., Hwang, W., Users satisfaction with five new cell phone features. In: C. Stephanidis, (eds.): HCI International - 11th international Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ling, R., Haddon, L., Mobile telephony, mobility and the coordination of everyday life. In: (eds.): Machines That Become Us. Leto, New Brunswick, NJ, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ling, R., Yttri, B.: Nobody sits at home and waits for the telephone to ring: Micro and hyper coordination through the use of the mobile phone. Telenor Research and Development, Kjeller, Norway, (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Löfgren, M., Witell, L.: Kano's Theory of Attractive Quality and Packaging. Quality management journal. 12(3) (2005), 7--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Marcus, A., Chen, E.: Designing the PDA of the future. Interactions. 9(1) (2002), 34--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Maslow, A.: Motivation and Personality. Harper, New York, (1954).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Maslow, A., Lowery, R.: Towards a Psychology of Being. Third ed. Vol. Wiley & Sons. New York, (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Mohageg, M., Bergman, E., Information Appliance Design at Sun Microsystems. In: (eds.): CHI '00 Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. ACM Press, The Hague, Netherlands, 2000, 63--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Norman, D. A.: The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York, (1988).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Palen, L., Salzman, M., Youngs, E.: Going wireless: behavior & practice of new mobile phone users. In Proceedings from the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 2000. Philadelphia, PA: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Qualasvirta, A.: Grounding the innovation of future technologies. Human Technology. 1(1) (2005), 58--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Schiphorst, T., Affectionate Computing: Can we fall in love with a machine. In: F. Nack, (eds.): IEEE MultiMedia. IEEE, 2006, 20--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Steverink, N., Lindenberg, S.: Which Social Needs Are Important for Subjective Well-Being? What Happens to Them With Aging? Psychology and Aging. 21(2) (2006), 281--290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. The Institute for Management Excellence: Basic human needs. Online Newsletter. Volume(June 1997) (1997),Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Biljon, J., Kotze, P., Marsden, G.: Motivational needs-driven mobile phone design. Lecture Notes in Computer Science - Human Computer Interaction INTERACT 2007. LNCS 4662 (2007), 523--526. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Van Biljon, J. A.: A Model for Representing the Motivational and Cultural Factors that Influence Mobile Phone Usage Variety. PhD Thesis, School of Computing, University of South Africa, Pretoria, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Ziefle, M., Bay, S., Mental Models of a cellular phone menu. Comparing older and younger novice users. In: S. Brewster and M. Dunlop, (eds.): Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Mobile Human-Computer Interaction --- MobileHCI 2004. Springer, Berlin, 2004, 25--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Ziefle, M., Bay, S.: The Complexity of Navigation Keys in Cellular Phones and their Effects on Performance of Teenagers and Older Adult Phone Users. In HCI International 11th international conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 2005. Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Mobile phone usage of young adults: the impact of motivational factors

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      OZCHI '08: Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Designing for Habitus and Habitat
      December 2008
      366 pages
      ISBN:0980306345
      DOI:10.1145/1517744

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 December 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      OZCHI '08 Paper Acceptance Rate28of57submissions,49%Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader