skip to main content
10.1145/1517664.1517718acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Media Crate: tangible live media production interface

Published:16 February 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Live media production -- the presentation of audio-visual content at events such as conferences and concerts -- is a high intensity task where a small production team must interact with an amalgamation of separate hardware tools to transform and direct a variety of media sources to outputs such as large screens, preview monitors, and web-casts. We present Media Crate, a tangible tabletop interface crafted in response to the key actions and needs of live media producers. Using tangibles, previously complex and ambiguous actions can now become collaborative and easy to learn, whilst providing expressive features not present in traditional interfaces. In this paper we give a description of the Media Crate's interface, discuss how knowledge and experience of live media production impacts on the design, and finally present the results of an initial deployment of the system at a live event.

References

  1. R. Bencina, M. Kaltenbrunner, and S. Jordá. Improved topological fiducial tracking in the reactivision system. In Proc. CVPR '05, page 99, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Brave, H. Ishii, and A. Dahley. Tangible interfaces for remote collaboration and communication. In Proc. CSCW '98, pages 169--178, New York, NY, USA, 1998. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. B. Buxton. Two-Handed Input in Human-Computer Interaction. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. E. Driskell. Does stress lead to a loss of team perspective? In Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 1999, Vol. 3, No. 4, 291--302, pages 291--302, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Edirol v4 by roland, July 2008. http://www.edirol.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. B. Hartmann, M. R. Morris, and A. Cassanego. Reducing clutter on tabletop groupware systems with tangible drawers. In Proc. UbiComp, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. E. Hornecker. Understanding the benefits of graspable interfaces for cooperative use. In Proc. 5th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, pages 71--87, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. Jordá, M. Kaltenbrunner, G. Geiger, and R. Bencina. The reactable*. In Proc. ICMC 2005, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Kaltenbrunner, T. Bovermann, R. Bencina, and E. Costanza. Tuio - a protocol for table based tangible user interfaces. In Proc. GW 2005, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Kaltenbrunner, S. O'Modhrain, and E. Costanza. Object design considerations for tangible musical interfaces. In Proc. COST287-ConGAS, Leeds, UK, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. R. Kruger, S. Carpendale, S. D. Scott, and S. Greenberg. How people use orientation on tables: comprehension, coordination and communication. In Proc. GROUP '03, pages 369--378, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Lew. Live cinema: designing an instrument for cinema editing as a live performance. In Proc. NIME '04, pages 144--149, Singapore, Singapore, 2004. National University of Singapore. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. R. Morris, K. Ryall, C. Shen, C. Forlines, and F. Vernier. Beyond "social protocols": multi-user coordination policies for co-located groupware. In Proc. CSCW '04, pages 262--265, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mediashout, July 2008. http://www.mediashout.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Richards. 32kg: performance systems for a post-digital age. In Proc. NIME '06, pages 283--287, Paris, France, France, 2006. IRCAM --- Centre Pompidou. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. Ringel, K. Ryall, C. Shen, C. Forlines, and F. Vernier. Release, relocate, reorient, resize: fluid techniques for document sharing on multi-user interactive tables. In Proc. CHI '04, pages 1441--1444, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. S. D. Scott, M. Sheelagh, T. Carpendale, and K. M. Inkpen. Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces. In Proc. CSCW '04, pages 294--303, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. C. Shen, K. Everitt, and K. Ryall. Ubitable: Impromptu face-to-face collaboration on horizontal interactive surfaces. In Proc. UbiComp, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. A. Tang, M. Tory, B. Po, P. Neumann, and S. Carpendale. Collaborative coupling over tabletop displays. In Proc. CHI '06, pages 1181--1190, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. B. Ullmer, H. Ishii, and D. Glas. mediablocks: physical containers, transports, and controls for online media. In Proc. SIGGRAPH '98, pages 379--386, New York, NY, USA, 1998. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Media Crate: tangible live media production interface

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      TEI '09: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction
      February 2009
      407 pages
      ISBN:9781605584935
      DOI:10.1145/1517664

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 February 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader